America's #1 Online Cigar Auction
first, best, biggest!

Last post 3 years ago by frankj1. 19 replies replies.
She didn't listen Delta...
Jump to Bottom | Previous Topic | Next Topic
DrafterX Offline
#1 Posted: Thu, Feb 11 2021, 1:38 PM EST
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,551
Hillary Clinton weighed in on former President Donald Trump's second impeachment trial this week, suggesting in a tweet that if the Senate ultimately votes to acquit him, it will only be because "the jury includes his co-conspirators."

"If Senate Republicans fail to convict Donald Trump, it won't be because the facts were with him or his lawyers mounted a competent defense," Clinton, the former secretary of state, tweeted Wednesday morning. "It will be because the jury includes his co-conspirators."



Not talking Not talking
delta1 Offline
#2 Posted: Thu, Feb 11 2021, 1:40 PM EST
Joined: 11-23-2011
Posts: 28,788
Hillary: STFU!!!



















but she's right, you know...
DrafterX Offline
#3 Posted: Thu, Feb 11 2021, 1:59 PM EST
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,551
Laugh
Smooth light Offline
#4 Posted: Thu, Feb 11 2021, 2:01 PM EST
Joined: 06-26-2020
Posts: 3,598
ESND...helldog
RayR Offline
#5 Posted: Thu, Feb 11 2021, 4:42 PM EST
Joined: 07-20-2020
Posts: 8,888
Hillary is the last lizard 🦎 person that should be talking about co-conspirators.
Speyside Offline
#6 Posted: Thu, Feb 11 2021, 6:37 PM EST
Joined: 03-16-2015
Posts: 13,106
Everytime Hillary opens her mouth a lesbian somewhere shudders in fear.
delta1 Offline
#7 Posted: Thu, Feb 11 2021, 7:47 PM EST
Joined: 11-23-2011
Posts: 28,788
Hillary was right...

just as Hillary said: several GOP Senators (Cruz, Graham, Lee) who have sworn an oath to be impartial jurors in the impeachment trial of Trump, have decided to meet behind closed doors with Trump's defense attorneys in order to plan strategy for his defense...


looks and smells bad, but sadly, their constituents are likely supportive of that "unusual" move
frankj1 Offline
#8 Posted: Thu, Feb 11 2021, 8:28 PM EST
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,221
but, but, re-election!
cowards.
Stogie1020 Offline
#9 Posted: Thu, Feb 11 2021, 10:31 PM EST
Joined: 12-19-2019
Posts: 5,335
delta1 wrote:
Hillary was right...

just as Hillary said: several GOP Senators (Cruz, Graham, Lee) who have sworn an oath to be impartial jurors in the impeachment trial of Trump, have decided to meet behind closed doors with Trump's defense attorneys in order to plan strategy for his defense...


looks and smells bad, but sadly, their constituents are likely supportive of that "unusual" move


Were you pissed at how Shifty Schiff conducted the collusion hoax hearing behind closed doors with no Trump reps present? I mean, if we are going to have 'outrage standards' they should be equally applied, no?

So, does meeting behind closed doors with only one side of an issue negate one's ability to be impartial or not?
DrafterX Offline
#10 Posted: Fri, Feb 12 2021, 12:15 AM EST
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,551
Hate Trump or you're a criminal.. Mellow
Smooth light Offline
#11 Posted: Fri, Feb 12 2021, 1:20 AM EST
Joined: 06-26-2020
Posts: 3,598
Were do you sign up for the...
CRIMINAL HATER CLUB...Is that the Booth beside the,HATE THE USA ORGANIZATION.🇺🇳
teedubbya Offline
#12 Posted: Fri, Feb 12 2021, 6:31 AM EST
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
Shift wasn’t a juror collaborating with the defense or the prosecution. It’s nowhere near equivalent and no where near absolving current bad behavior.

If you want a real equivalent I do think some dem senators have also been talking with the house impeachment team along the way. Both wrong in my view but some only see the other side doing wrong while they willfully suck their guys smegma covered cox. Disgusting.

Be outraged all you want about shift, I don’t see anyone defending him certainly not me, but don’t use it to hide or justify what is going on now.

If you are cool with bs being done by your side because you just want your side to win at all cost no matter what is really right or wrong just admit it. Don’t pretend or fall back on the diversionary talking points developed by those that do have that mentality. Many are blindly following those they profess to dislike. Wrong is wrong full stop.

In here we are real, good people not political scum. How do we get sucked so far in to one side or the other that we are willing to play their game and support the absurd?

We need to snap out of it.
RayR Offline
#13 Posted: Fri, Feb 12 2021, 8:21 AM EST
Joined: 07-20-2020
Posts: 8,888
I can't believe anyone could be that naïve to believe a juror, especially a party partisan could be impartial. Everyone is biased going in and it would take a major piece of damning evidence to the contrary to change their mind.
izonfire Offline
#14 Posted: Fri, Feb 12 2021, 8:51 AM EST
Joined: 12-09-2013
Posts: 8,647
teedubbya wrote:
Shift wasn’t a juror collaborating with the defense or the prosecution. It’s nowhere near equivalent and no where near absolving current bad behavior.

If you want a real equivalent I do think some dem senators have also been talking with the house impeachment team along the way. Both wrong in my view but some only see the other side doing wrong while they willfully suck their guys smegma covered cox. Disgusting.
.................................

Why does it always end up with smegma covered cox with you???
teedubbya Offline
#15 Posted: Fri, Feb 12 2021, 9:02 AM EST
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
We all look at life through our own filter izon. Drafter sees hairy Mayo dripping bungholes.
ZRX1200 Offline
#16 Posted: Fri, Feb 12 2021, 12:50 PM EST
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,604
To be fair I think DrafterX also sees bacon and tomatoes Mellow
delta1 Offline
#17 Posted: Fri, Feb 12 2021, 1:10 PM EST
Joined: 11-23-2011
Posts: 28,788
Stogie1020 wrote:
Were you pissed at how Shifty Schiff conducted the collusion hoax hearing behind closed doors with no Trump reps present? I mean, if we are going to have 'outrage standards' they should be equally applied, no?

So, does meeting behind closed doors with only one side of an issue negate one's ability to be impartial or not?


another con myth popularly recited ...

they were invited to attend, but refused...

https://www.factcheck.org/2020/01/false-and-misleading-claims-at-impeachment-trial/


in some cases subpoenas were issued compelling Trump/member of his administration to attend but they were ignored...cons were OK with that thumbing of the nose at the rule of law
teedubbya Offline
#18 Posted: Fri, Feb 12 2021, 8:57 PM EST
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
Drafter still likes hairy but holes though right? Mellow
frankj1 Offline
#19 Posted: Fri, Feb 12 2021, 9:41 PM EST
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,221
RayR wrote:
I can't believe anyone could be that naïve to believe a juror, especially a party partisan could be impartial. Everyone is biased going in and it would take a major piece of damning evidence to the contrary to change their mind.

the same people you trash daily, now you think flourish in your system... Biased?
Not possible. It's all love and fairness without rules and laws.

Human nature.
Users browsing this topic
Guest
Back to Top