America's #1 Online Cigar Auction
first, best, biggest!

Last post 3 years ago by RayR. 40 replies replies.
SCC
Jump to Bottom | Previous Topic | Next Topic
deadeyedick Offline
#1 Posted: Thu, Apr 22 2021, 10:51 AM EST
Joined: 03-13-2003
Posts: 17,089
With Biden's 50% reduction by 2030 get used to the term Social Cost Of Carbon.

Get your Prius now.
HockeyDad Offline
#2 Posted: Thu, Apr 22 2021, 10:54 AM EST
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,134
I could go for some tacos el carbon right about now.
teedubbya Offline
#3 Posted: Thu, Apr 22 2021, 11:09 AM EST
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
I am bookmarking this thread so I can return after my outrage subsides and I can think clearly.
Speyside Offline
#4 Posted: Thu, Apr 22 2021, 11:14 AM EST
Joined: 03-16-2015
Posts: 13,106
Carbon credits are going to become very valuable over time. We have not sold a single one.
teedubbya Offline
#5 Posted: Thu, Apr 22 2021, 11:28 AM EST
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
We need an Al Gore Rhythm
HockeyDad Offline
#6 Posted: Thu, Apr 22 2021, 11:34 AM EST
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,134
Speyside wrote:
Carbon credits are going to become very valuable over time. We have not sold a single one.


Actually we already have carbon credits and a cap and trade program in California.
bgz Offline
#7 Posted: Thu, Apr 22 2021, 12:36 PM EST
Joined: 07-29-2014
Posts: 13,023
teedubbya wrote:
We need an Al Gore Rhythm


I think that's how the internwebs were built.
Speyside Offline
#8 Posted: Thu, Apr 22 2021, 12:59 PM EST
Joined: 03-16-2015
Posts: 13,106
To clarify we have not sold a single one that we own.
Krazeehorse Offline
#9 Posted: Thu, Apr 22 2021, 1:02 PM EST
Joined: 04-09-2010
Posts: 1,958
Don't forget to add in your mileage tax.
delta1 Offline
#10 Posted: Thu, Apr 22 2021, 1:16 PM EST
Joined: 11-23-2011
Posts: 28,788
as CA slowly sinks...
JadeRose Offline
#11 Posted: Thu, Apr 22 2021, 2:56 PM EST
Joined: 05-15-2008
Posts: 19,525
I bought a couple of bags of charcoal the other day. Pretty sure I paid tax on it, too. Them sumbitches
HockeyDad Offline
#12 Posted: Thu, Apr 22 2021, 3:10 PM EST
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,134
Speyside wrote:
To clarify we have not sold a single one that we own.


Do you need some more? I can sell you some. How much should I put you down for?
Speyside Offline
#13 Posted: Thu, Apr 22 2021, 3:33 PM EST
Joined: 03-16-2015
Posts: 13,106
^ LMAO! Well played HD.
tonygraz Offline
#14 Posted: Thu, Apr 22 2021, 8:48 PM EST
Joined: 08-11-2008
Posts: 20,253
HockeyDad wrote:
Do you need some more? I can sell you some. How much should I put you down for?


Sounds like the pitch fork and torch business is depressed. Have you thought about electric torches ?
BuckyB93 Offline
#15 Posted: Thu, Apr 22 2021, 9:10 PM EST
Joined: 07-16-2004
Posts: 14,191
Electric torches still require burning oil, coal, NG (most common sources of energy) to create electricity. He gains carbon credits by going solar.

He should be focusing on solar or wind powered torches.
Speyside Offline
#16 Posted: Thu, Apr 22 2021, 9:18 PM EST
Joined: 03-16-2015
Posts: 13,106
Plus you could replace tar and boiling oil with geothermal.
BuckyB93 Offline
#17 Posted: Thu, Apr 22 2021, 9:22 PM EST
Joined: 07-16-2004
Posts: 14,191
I see the makings of an SBIR proposal to get some scratch from the DOE.
Smooth light Offline
#18 Posted: Thu, Apr 22 2021, 9:36 PM EST
Joined: 06-26-2020
Posts: 3,598
Cut carbon=dead trees... plus veggies, fruits,grass,weed,wine,etc. Faze two, meat, booze, clothes, etc...
Oxygen who the hell need that.

One good thing, no more forest fires, after the last BIG burn.

I guess they didn't learn about, plants converting CO2 into OXYGEN.
Only taught hate and racism.
BuckyB93 Offline
#19 Posted: Thu, Apr 22 2021, 10:07 PM EST
Joined: 07-16-2004
Posts: 14,191
^
You're not invited to the SBIR proposal meetings.

NINE! teen
JadeRose Offline
#20 Posted: Fri, Apr 23 2021, 7:00 AM EST
Joined: 05-15-2008
Posts: 19,525
BuckyB93 wrote:
Electric torches still require burning oil, coal, NG (most common sources of energy) to create electricity. He gains carbon credits by going solar.

He should be focusing on solar or wind powered torches.




Solar powered torches? We called those "magnifying glasses" when I was a kid.
deadeyedick Offline
#21 Posted: Fri, Apr 23 2021, 7:24 AM EST
Joined: 03-13-2003
Posts: 17,089
When you were a kid they burned people at the stake for heat.
RayR Offline
#22 Posted: Fri, Apr 23 2021, 8:37 AM EST
Joined: 07-20-2020
Posts: 8,888
Smooth light wrote:
Cut carbon=dead trees... plus veggies, fruits,grass,weed,wine,etc. Faze two, meat, booze, clothes, etc...
Oxygen who the hell need that.

One good thing, no more forest fires, after the last BIG burn.

I guess they didn't learn about, plants converting CO2 into OXYGEN.
Only taught hate and racism.


I myself as a carbon based organism am pro-carbon. The carbon hate racist crowd are the the gas bag methane heads, proponents of the Green New Deal. They hate oxygen because methanogens require low oxygen environments to produce their gas and worse yet we burn their hydrocarbon for fuel releasing its carbon. They hate CO2 because the molecule is made up of carbon and oxygen and is a necessary part of the carbon cycle that sustains carbon based organisms including plants that require CO2 as crucial part of their metabolism that creates sugars and nutrients that in turn nourish carbon based animals.

You'll also find the same gas bag methane heads as propagandists for wearing face masks. So you see why the gas bag methane head Dr. Fauci doesn't follow the science released by his own bureaucracy. Starving the brain of O2 is part of the recipe for creating more gas bag methane heads that will vote for commies progressives. Sinister aren't they?

Quote:
A recent Stanford study released by the NCBI, which is under the National Institutes of Health, showed that masks do absolutely nothing to help prevent the spread of COVID-19 and their use is even harmful.

"Wearing facemasks has been demonstrated to have substantial adverse physiological and psychological effects. These include hypoxia, hypercapnia, shortness of breath, increased acidity and toxicity, activation of fear and stress response, rise in stress hormones, immunosuppression, fatigue, headaches, decline in cognitive performance, predisposition for viral and infectious illnesses, chronic stress, anxiety and depression. Long-term consequences of wearing facemask can cause health deterioration, developing and progression of chronic diseases and premature death."

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/04/stanford-study-results-facemasks-ineffective-block-transmission-covid-19-actually-can-cause-health-deterioration-premature-death/
Speyside Offline
#23 Posted: Fri, Apr 23 2021, 8:47 AM EST
Joined: 03-16-2015
Posts: 13,106
Absolute lies like you always post.

ishttps://www.forbes.com/sites/brucelee/2021/04/22/did-so-called-stanford-nih-study-really-show-face-masks-are-ineffective-against-covid-19/

It is not a Stanford of Nih study. In fact it isn't a study at all.
Smooth light Offline
#24 Posted: Fri, Apr 23 2021, 9:18 AM EST
Joined: 06-26-2020
Posts: 3,598
🦜🦜🦜🦜🦜🦜🦜🦜🦜🦜🦜🦜🦜
Someone been feeding them"crack"crackers again!! Chrip chrip.

DO NOT FEED THE PARROT'S !!!!

they got a mask over their mine's, maybe 5.

Hehe 😊
izonfire Offline
#25 Posted: Fri, Apr 23 2021, 9:30 AM EST
Joined: 12-09-2013
Posts: 8,647
^ You be Chrippin' early today Smoothie...
teedubbya Offline
#26 Posted: Fri, Apr 23 2021, 9:31 AM EST
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
I could go for a smoothie about now
izonfire Offline
#27 Posted: Fri, Apr 23 2021, 9:33 AM EST
Joined: 12-09-2013
Posts: 8,647
teedubbya wrote:
I could go for a smoothie about now

The Boston steamer is waiting for you in another thread...
teedubbya Offline
#28 Posted: Fri, Apr 23 2021, 9:38 AM EST
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
I've graduated from Cleveland to Boston! Atlanta here I come. It's gonna burn like sherman.
HockeyDad Offline
#29 Posted: Fri, Apr 23 2021, 11:47 AM EST
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,134
BuckyB93 wrote:
Electric torches still require burning oil, coal, NG (most common sources of energy) to create electricity. He gains carbon credits by going solar.

He should be focusing on solar or wind powered torches.


Solar powered torches suck at night and that’s when Antifa and BLM come out to mostly peaceful protest.
HockeyDad Offline
#30 Posted: Fri, Apr 23 2021, 11:59 AM EST
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,134
tonygraz wrote:
Sounds like the pitch fork and torch business is depressed. Have you thought about electric torches ?


Diversity is your friend. Pitchforks and torches for some people, carbon credits for others. (Maybe the same person buys both due to torch use guilt)

The best part about Le HockeyDad Carbon Credits (TM) is that thy come from forest repopulation in Togawandaland. Where is Togowandaland you ask? That is the beauty of it....it is where ever you want to believe it is!

I’ll put you down for a nice starter pack of carbon credits that are currently going for $25K. Just for you I’ll make you a special deal for the starter pack with just three easy payments of $10K each.

RayR Offline
#31 Posted: Fri, Apr 23 2021, 12:58 PM EST
Joined: 07-20-2020
Posts: 8,888
Speyside wrote:
Absolute lies like you always post.

ishttps://www.forbes.com/sites/brucelee/2021/04/22/did-so-called-stanford-nih-study-really-show-face-masks-are-ineffective-against-covid-19/

It is not a Stanford of Nih study. In fact it isn't a study at all.


Why doesn't Bruce Lee (writer, journalist, professor, systems modeler, computational and digital health expert, avocado-eater, and entrepreneur, not always in that order) offer evidence that masks stop the RONA?
Opps! That's right, there is no correlation in the data to support it. Herr Fauci is confused and doesn't get it.
https://nypost.com/2021/04/10/fauci-not-sure-why-texas-doesnt-have-covid-uptick-after-nixing-masks/

Why is this heresy published on the NCBI website when the MSM, Facebook, YouTube and Twitter censor it?

Carbon based life forms want to know.

From the linked article:
"What Stanford nor any of the various fact-checkers addressing this story do not do is acknowledge that states without face mask requirements are seeing reduced Covid cases while with the strictest face masks requirements are spiking. The conclusions drawn in this study are still relevant whether Stanford and others acknowledge the scientific data or not."

https://noqreport.com/2021/04/17/stanford-study-quietly-published-at-nih-gov-proves-face-masks-are-absolutely-worthless-against-covid

Horror of horrors! Did you know there are states and towns and peoples who are not listening to Dicktator O'Biden and Herr Fauci? LOL LOL LOL
https://www.lewrockwell.com/lrc-blog/a-nation-of-maskholes/
Speyside Offline
#32 Posted: Fri, Apr 23 2021, 1:22 PM EST
Joined: 03-16-2015
Posts: 13,106
Don't give 2 chits about that article. You lied. That is a fact. Prove me wrong and don't deflect. Find the Stanford study directly or find an NIH link. If you can do either of those I will gladly take back my words. Otherwise you are a lier.
Speyside Offline
#33 Posted: Fri, Apr 23 2021, 1:42 PM EST
Joined: 03-16-2015
Posts: 13,106
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7730488/

This article by NCBI disproves what you said. Quote direct from the source please. Not an editorial that is lying. Though truth doesn't fit your POV in this instance.
Smooth light Offline
#34 Posted: Fri, Apr 23 2021, 1:43 PM EST
Joined: 06-26-2020
Posts: 3,598
Common sense says, you can never convince somebody that's been deceived, they can't believe their own lion eyes.

Did you believe the sky is up,or did it have to be in writing? How about are you alive?
Or just magnetic ink.
RayR Offline
#35 Posted: Sat, Apr 24 2021, 10:40 AM EST
Joined: 07-20-2020
Posts: 8,888
Speyside wrote:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7730488/

This article by NCBI disproves what you said. Quote direct from the source please. Not an editorial that is lying. Though truth doesn't fit your POV in this instance.


Ah, so you don't give give 2 chits about the other article but you like this one. Sounds like you are like the big tech censors who filter out and cancel all the scientific evidence, all the doctors and scientists that don't parrot the official reptilian COVID doomer cult with its superstitions and dogma. Intellectual curiosity must be thwarted at all costs, debate must be cancelled lest the proles learn they've been bamboozled and their emperors have no clothes.
I suppose they are all liars and science deniers just because they reject preaching wearing the muzzle of obedience, the arbitrary social distancing and the authoritarian lockdowns. They must want people to die!
Speyside Offline
#36 Posted: Sat, Apr 24 2021, 11:58 AM EST
Joined: 03-16-2015
Posts: 13,106
No, I like facts from the source. Not opinion pieces.
RayR Offline
#37 Posted: Sat, Apr 24 2021, 1:22 PM EST
Joined: 07-20-2020
Posts: 8,888
Speyside wrote:
No, I like facts from the source. Not opinion pieces.


Com'on man, where's the facts?
The data doesn't support the superstitious malarkey (so-called "facts from the source") of O'Biden and Flip Floppin Fauci.

Get the free e-book, COVID Charts CNN Forgot...and lots more real facts
. https://tomwoods.com/covid/
Speyside Offline
#38 Posted: Sat, Apr 24 2021, 3:53 PM EST
Joined: 03-16-2015
Posts: 13,106
You us op Ed's, done.
Mr. Jones Offline
#39 Posted: Sat, Apr 24 2021, 7:00 PM EST
Joined: 06-12-2005
Posts: 19,423
My arse wipes carbon...

Joe STRANOSA has seen it...
RayR Offline
#40 Posted: Sun, Apr 25 2021, 7:52 AM EST
Joined: 07-20-2020
Posts: 8,888
Speyside wrote:
You us op Ed's, done.


Op-ed's? WTF!
It's the data man. Follow the data, it's the gubment's own data.
Don't you follow the scientific data? The science will set you free.

Or is cultish nonsense spewed by tax eating lizards like politicians and public health bureaucrats science to you?
Users browsing this topic
Guest
Back to Top