America's #1 Online Cigar Auction
first, best, biggest!

Last post 22 months ago by RayR. 4 replies replies.
51 years ago today
ZRX1200 Offline
#1 Posted:
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,604
Tricky Dicky took us off the Gold Standard.

So great they can loan themselves unlimited amounts of money, I blame FOGs that like the status quo for this you let it happen.
Gene363 Offline
#2 Posted:
Joined: 01-24-2003
Posts: 30,815
ZRX1200 wrote:
Tricky Dicky took us off the Gold Standard.

So great they can loan themselves unlimited amounts of money, I blame FOGs that like the status quo for this you let it happen.


On the autobahn to hell and mashed the accelerator to the floor.
bgz Offline
#3 Posted:
Joined: 07-29-2014
Posts: 13,023
Fiat > gold.

At least with fiat, you know what you are trading is inherently useless.

Go try to eat or drink a bar of gold... Or build a shelter with it.
RayR Offline
#4 Posted:
Joined: 07-20-2020
Posts: 8,888
Benny, You are building one of your ahistorical hyperbolic fantasy scenarios again. Whoever said you needed a bar of gold to eat or drink or do anything else under a hard commodity money standard? Then again you realize that fiat money is a fantasy of the mind and inherently useless?

But anyway, I have LINKS because I know you love LINKS!

EXCERPT: "On 15 August 1971 Marx’s vision became true: The US administration single-handedly terminated the redeemability of the US dollar into physical gold – and so gold, the currency of the civilized world, was officially demonetized. Through this coup de main, in the United States of America, as well as all other countries in this world, an unbacked paper money — or fiat money system was established. Since then, all currencies around the globe represent fiat currencies: representing money creation by circulation credit expansion, not backed by real savings or deposits, monopolized by central banks."

Why Marx Loved Central Banks


02/08/2019
Thorsten Polleit

Quote:
In his “Manifesto of the Communist Party” (1848), published together with Frederick Engels, Karl Marx calls for “measures” — by which he means “despotic inroads on the rights of property” –, which would be “unavoidable as a means of entirely revolutionising the mode of production,” that is, bringing about socialism-communism. Marx’s measure number five reads: “Centralisation of credit in the hands of the state, by means of a national bank with State capital and an exclusive monopoly.” This is a rather perspicacious postulation, especially as at the time when Marx formulated it, precious metals — gold and silver in particular — served as money.

As is well known, the quantity of gold and silver cannot be increased at will. As a result, the quantity of credit (in terms of lending and borrowing money balances) cannot easily be expanded according to political expediency. However, Marx might have fantasized already, what would be possible once the state is put in a position where it can create money through credit expansion; where it has usurped and monopolized the production of money. Long before Marx, the English churchman and historian Thomas Fuller had elaborately expressed the power of money: “Money is the sinew of love as well as war.”

More...

https://mises.org/wire/why-marx-loved-central-banks
Users browsing this topic
Guest