America's #1 Online Cigar Auction
first, best, biggest!

Last post 2 months ago by MACS. 15 replies replies.
Natural Gas Hasn’t Been This Cheap in Decades
rfenst Offline
#1 Posted:
Joined: 06-23-2007
Posts: 39,345
The lowest inflation-adjusted prices in at least 34 years have drillers throttling down from record production


WSJ

An unusually warm winter and roaring U.S. output have pushed natural-gas prices to some of the lowest levels of the shale era.

Adjusted for inflation, natural-gas futures recently hit their cheapest prices since trading began on the New York Mercantile Exchange in 1990.

This is good news for American consumers, who can look forward to lower utility bills, as well as for businesses that use a lot of natural gas making basic materials like steel, concrete, cardboard and fertilizer. Americans’ gas costs in January were about 18% lower from a year earlier, according to the Labor Department.

But the plunge is weighing on gas producers, who are dialing back their drilling plans and pushing for more exports to relieve the domestic glut.

Natural-gas futures for March delivery ended this past week at $1.603 per million British thermal units, down 35% from a year ago. On Tuesday, futures closed at $1.576, an inflation-adjusted all-time low.

“The market is clearly oversupplied,” said Chesapeake Energy Chief Executive Nick Dell’Osso. “We think we should hold back our supply to better meet that demand.”

U.S. gas prices have been on a roller coaster in the two decades since energy producers began tapping shale formations using hydraulic fracturing and horizontal drilling techniques.

Repeatedly, the frackers have flooded the gas market until prices crash. The low prices discourage drilling, prompt the plugging of piddly wells and weed out inefficient operators. Eventually, cheap gas stokes demand, prices recover and producers send drilling rigs back into the field.

Aside from a dip below $1.50 per million BTUs during the 2020 Covid market crash, natural-gas prices haven’t been so low in nominal terms since 1995. Adjusted for inflation, however, $1.50 today would be about $3 back then.

Chesapeake, one of the country’s biggest producers, said this past week it would cut its 2024 spending by 20% from earlier plans and throttle back output by roughly 20% compared with last year. The Oklahoma City company said it would drill but not complete wells for the remainder of the year, leaving gas in the ground until prices rise.

Analysts and executives expect that to happen late this year and in 2025, when the next wave of new export terminals start shipping out liquefied natural gas, or LNG.

Gas futures rose more than 12% Wednesday in response to Chesapeake’s cuts, the biggest daily gain since June 2022, when prices were surging in the wake of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. Shares of Chesapeake had their best day in more than a year. So did those of rivals EQT and Comstock Resources, which have announced their own plans to reduce drilling.

“This is exactly how companies should be responding to historically low natural-gas prices,” said Mark Viviano, a managing partner at energy investment firm Kimmeridge. The firm owns stakes in Chesapeake as well as Southwestern Energy, which agreed last month to merge and create the country’s largest gas producer.

It could be months before spending cuts are reflected in significantly lower production given that drilling and hydraulic fracturing crews work on contracts, analysts and executives say.

Daily U.S. production has come down to about 104 billion cubic feet this month from a record of more than 106 billion cubic feet in December, but that’s still 3.3% more than last February, according to S&P Global Commodity Insights.

Meanwhile, demand has been unusually low. Big heating markets including Minneapolis, Cleveland, Pittsburgh and Fargo, N.D., are experiencing their mildest winters in records dating back to 1950, according to the Midwestern Regional Climate Center.

J.P. Morgan meteorologists expect February to have about 21% less heating-degree days—a population-weighted measure of temperatures below 65 degrees Fahrenheit that gas traders use to gauge demand—compared with the 10-year average.

All the gas that isn’t being burned in furnaces and boilers is backing up in storage facilities, which as of Feb. 16 held 22% more gas than the five-year average for this time of year, according to the Energy Information Administration.

Analysts say that domestic storage capacity is in danger of filling up later this year unless prices are low enough to curtail production and entice electricity generators to switch from burning coal to gas.

The second straight mild winter has left coal piled up at power plants, which means its price has come down and gas will have to be even cheaper than it was last year to convince power producers to switch feedstocks, said Matt Palmer, an executive director at S&P Global Commodity Insights.

“We averaged $2.50 last year; we might have to average $2 this year to get that same level of displacement,” he said.

Some traders are betting that it could get ugly for gas producers.

Put options, which are contracts that convey the right to sell gas at a certain price, have recently traded as low as 50 cents per million BTUs, said Charlie Macnamara, head of commodities at U.S. Bank.

“The market is of the opinion that we could go there,” he said.
Abrignac Offline
#2 Posted:
Joined: 02-24-2012
Posts: 17,306
rfenst wrote:
The lowest inflation-adjusted prices in at least 34 years have drillers throttling down from record production


WSJ

An unusually warm winter and roaring U.S. output have pushed natural-gas prices to some of the lowest levels of the shale era.

Adjusted for inflation, natural-gas futures recently hit their cheapest prices since trading began on the New York Mercantile Exchange in 1990.

This is good news for American consumers, who can look forward to lower utility bills, as well as for businesses that use a lot of natural gas making basic materials like steel, concrete, cardboard and fertilizer. Americans’ gas costs in January were about 18% lower from a year earlier, according to the Labor Department.

But the plunge is weighing on gas producers, who are dialing back their drilling plans and pushing for more exports to relieve the domestic glut.

Natural-gas futures for March delivery ended this past week at $1.603 per million British thermal units, down 35% from a year ago. On Tuesday, futures closed at $1.576, an inflation-adjusted all-time low.

“The market is clearly oversupplied,” said Chesapeake Energy Chief Executive Nick Dell’Osso. “We think we should hold back our supply to better meet that demand.”

U.S. gas prices have been on a roller coaster in the two decades since energy producers began tapping shale formations using hydraulic fracturing and horizontal drilling techniques.

Repeatedly, the frackers have flooded the gas market until prices crash. The low prices discourage drilling, prompt the plugging of piddly wells and weed out inefficient operators. Eventually, cheap gas stokes demand, prices recover and producers send drilling rigs back into the field.

Aside from a dip below $1.50 per million BTUs during the 2020 Covid market crash, natural-gas prices haven’t been so low in nominal terms since 1995. Adjusted for inflation, however, $1.50 today would be about $3 back then.

Chesapeake, one of the country’s biggest producers, said this past week it would cut its 2024 spending by 20% from earlier plans and throttle back output by roughly 20% compared with last year. The Oklahoma City company said it would drill but not complete wells for the remainder of the year, leaving gas in the ground until prices rise.

Analysts and executives expect that to happen late this year and in 2025, when the next wave of new export terminals start shipping out liquefied natural gas, or LNG.

Gas futures rose more than 12% Wednesday in response to Chesapeake’s cuts, the biggest daily gain since June 2022, when prices were surging in the wake of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. Shares of Chesapeake had their best day in more than a year. So did those of rivals EQT and Comstock Resources, which have announced their own plans to reduce drilling.

“This is exactly how companies should be responding to historically low natural-gas prices,” said Mark Viviano, a managing partner at energy investment firm Kimmeridge. The firm owns stakes in Chesapeake as well as Southwestern Energy, which agreed last month to merge and create the country’s largest gas producer.

It could be months before spending cuts are reflected in significantly lower production given that drilling and hydraulic fracturing crews work on contracts, analysts and executives say.

Daily U.S. production has come down to about 104 billion cubic feet this month from a record of more than 106 billion cubic feet in December, but that’s still 3.3% more than last February, according to S&P Global Commodity Insights.

Meanwhile, demand has been unusually low. Big heating markets including Minneapolis, Cleveland, Pittsburgh and Fargo, N.D., are experiencing their mildest winters in records dating back to 1950, according to the Midwestern Regional Climate Center.

J.P. Morgan meteorologists expect February to have about 21% less heating-degree days—a population-weighted measure of temperatures below 65 degrees Fahrenheit that gas traders use to gauge demand—compared with the 10-year average.

All the gas that isn’t being burned in furnaces and boilers is backing up in storage facilities, which as of Feb. 16 held 22% more gas than the five-year average for this time of year, according to the Energy Information Administration.

Analysts say that domestic storage capacity is in danger of filling up later this year unless prices are low enough to curtail production and entice electricity generators to switch from burning coal to gas.

The second straight mild winter has left coal piled up at power plants, which means its price has come down and gas will have to be even cheaper than it was last year to convince power producers to switch feedstocks, said Matt Palmer, an executive director at S&P Global Commodity Insights.

“We averaged $2.50 last year; we might have to average $2 this year to get that same level of displacement,” he said.

Some traders are betting that it could get ugly for gas producers.

Put options, which are contracts that convey the right to sell gas at a certain price, have recently traded as low as 50 cents per million BTUs, said Charlie Macnamara, head of commodities at U.S. Bank.

“The market is of the opinion that we could go there,” he said.



And yet I just paid the highest natural gas home heating bill I’ve had in six years last month.
RayR Offline
#3 Posted:
Joined: 07-20-2020
Posts: 8,912
Natural gas prices have been way down here in NY compared to 1 year ago, The natural gas glut has been driven by warmer-than-average winter temperatures.
I LOVE GLOBAL WARMING!
drglnc Offline
#4 Posted:
Joined: 04-01-2019
Posts: 715
DAMN IT OBAMA!!!!
HockeyDad Offline
#5 Posted:
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,156
Low natural gas prices are not good for solar and wind energy. We may need to make some adjustments to gas supply after the election.
DrMaddVibe Offline
#6 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,489
Putin wept
RayR Offline
#7 Posted:
Joined: 07-20-2020
Posts: 8,912
The LEFTIES will get back to working on banning gas stoves and furnaces so people will have no choice but to go with expensive electric versions of appliances which will be a boon to solar and wind corporatists. They say Inflicting maximum pain on the consumer is the only way to save the planet.
RobertHively Online
#8 Posted:
Joined: 01-14-2015
Posts: 1,872
Thanks to The 🍊 MENG and Joe Sanostra, I got my own gas well-- my bill is $0.00 per cubic foot.

For you "lefties", think of Hivelyland as "The Chop" except that we actually produce things.
MACS Offline
#9 Posted:
Joined: 02-26-2004
Posts: 79,809
My house, and entire neighborhood... is all electric.

I had gas heat, gas water heater and gas stove and fireplace in Temecula. Doesn't seem Florida uses natural gas appliances and such... at least not that I have seen.

I prefer it. Much cheaper than electric.
HockeyDad Offline
#10 Posted:
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,156
MACS wrote:
My house, and entire neighborhood... is all electric.

I had gas heat, gas water heater and gas stove and fireplace in Temecula. Doesn't seem Florida uses natural gas appliances and such... at least not that I have seen.

I prefer it. Much cheaper than electric.


Mine is all natural gas. It was a requirement. It isn’t available everywhere in Florida and some developers go all electric to sell it as green.
BuckyB93 Offline
#11 Posted:
Joined: 07-16-2004
Posts: 14,213
I have natural gas for the cooking stove/oven and hot water heater. Everything else is electric.

Just got the electric bill today and the delivery charges and other BS they put on it was about 45% of the bill while the energy usage part is 55%. For reference I pay $0.142/kWh for electricity. The following is a list of charges above and beyond the actual usage charges.

Customer charge - WTF is that for? A charge to just to be a customer?
Distribution charge - my understanding is to maintain the poles, wires and stuff to get the electricity delivered to you. I'm fine with that. Wires, poles, generators transformers don't maintain themselves.
Transmission charge - WTF is that and isn't that part of the distribution charge?
Energy Efficiency charge - WTF is that? I'm getting charged for being energy efficient or inefficient? Either way how do you know or rank how efficient or inefficient I am?
Renewable energy charge - again WTF is that? You are charging me for renewable energy? The only renewable energy I have is if I light my farts or burn my poop. If I did so, shouldn't I get credit for it?
Distributed solar charge - again WTF is that? I don't have solar panels. So what is this charge for? Am I being charged to offset folks that have solar panels and windmills?
Electric Vehicle charge - I ask again WTF is that? The only electric vehicle I have is a bike. How would they know that and why would they charge someone for it? Wouldn't charging the vehicle be covered by paying for the electricity? Maybe its a charge to me to cover those rebates that are passed out to those that have an electric car.

I have no problem paying for what I use. I have no problem paying my part to maintain the electric grid but the other crap, in my opinion, is BS padding the bill with stuff that I don't use.

My natural gas bill is only for what I use. I think it's only about $20 a month since it's only for the stove and the water heater. I'm guessing the town handles or farms out the gas line maintenance (all underground) and it's folded into the property tax portion of payments.
Abrignac Offline
#12 Posted:
Joined: 02-24-2012
Posts: 17,306
BuckyB93 wrote:
I have natural gas for the cooking stove/oven and hot water heater. Everything else is electric.

Just got the electric bill today and the delivery charges and other BS they put on it was about 45% of the bill while the energy usage part is 55%. For reference I pay $0.142/kWh for electricity. The following is a list of charges above and beyond the actual usage charges.

Customer charge - WTF is that for? A charge to just to be a customer?
Distribution charge - my understanding is to maintain the poles, wires and stuff to get the electricity delivered to you. I'm fine with that. Wires, poles, generators transformers don't maintain themselves.
Transmission charge - WTF is that and isn't that part of the distribution charge?

You can chalk this one up to deregulation. In 1992 FERC passed Order #636 which separated natural gas supply charges from natural gas delivery charges. The idea was to make natural gas cheaper by adding competion to both the supply as well as delivery. But it was a total failure. In reality it drove prices up. My family managed a small natural gas supply company that went through this. Up until that point we simply paid a bill every month to our supplier. After the rule was put into place we ended up with all sorts of itemized bills for charges that had to be passed on to the customers.

Energy Efficiency charge - WTF is that? I'm getting charged for being energy efficient or inefficient? Either way how do you know or rank how efficient or inefficient I am?

That would be a subsidy to encourage manufacturers to make more expensive, yet supposedly efficient appliances.

Renewable energy charge - again WTF is that? You are charging me for renewable energy? The only renewable energy I have is if I light my farts or burn my poop. If I did so, shouldn't I get credit for it?

Another subsidy. See above.

Distributed solar charge - again WTF is that? I don't have solar panels. So what is this charge for? Am I being charged to offset folks that have solar panels and windmills?

Yet another subsidy. See above.

Electric Vehicle charge - I ask again WTF is that? The only electric vehicle I have is a bike. How would they know that and why would they charge someone for it? Wouldn't charging the vehicle be covered by paying for the electricity? Maybe its a charge to me to cover those rebates that are passed out to those that have an electric car.

More subsidies. See above.

I have no problem paying for what I use. I have no problem paying my part to maintain the electric grid but the other crap, in my opinion, is BS padding the bill with stuff that I don't use.

My natural gas bill is only for what I use. I think it's only about $20 a month since it's only for the stove and the water heater. I'm guessing the town handles or farms out the gas line maintenance (all underground) and it's folded into the property tax portion of payments.

Mr. Jones Offline
#13 Posted:
Joined: 06-12-2005
Posts: 19,434
#8 Robert hively post...

LMMFAO!!!

YOU ARE AN EXCELLENT APPRENTICE...
GRASSHOPPER....

just like BOO BOO FRANKJ1

BuckyB93 Offline
#14 Posted:
Joined: 07-16-2004
Posts: 14,213
I don't mind paying for what I use. I don't mind paying my part to maintain the infrastructure to get the energy to me that I use. I don't mind paying for energy creation (then again you can't create energy... First Law of Thermodynamics says so)

What irritates me is paying for subsidies for stuff I don't use. If you want to have solar panels on your house... I'm all for that, but you pay for it or set up a payment plan since they (supposedly) pay for themselves eventually. Don't bleed others $10 a month that don't want one or it's not logical or financially feasible to install one. The same applies to windmills. Supposedly they pay for themselves so why do you charge me for your "free energy" decision.

Don't penalize me for you buying an EV. You bought it, you pay for the electricity to charge it. Pretty simple: I don't have and EV car nor do I want one so why do I have to pay a couple bucks a month for you to have one? Don't charge me an EV surcharge.

If I put a window AC in, I pay for the unit and I pay for the energy to be delivered to me and to power it. Can I send a bill to to EV owners to subsidize my electrical use for my window AC unit? If I use an electrical space heater in the winter, can I send them a bill to subsidize the use of that? Rhetorical and off topic questions.

I try to be as energy efficient as I can, I'm a big supporter to being efficient, but looking at the electric bill and see a good chunk of it is for some weird charges for services that I don't use kind of irritates me.
MACS Offline
#15 Posted:
Joined: 02-26-2004
Posts: 79,809
HockeyDad wrote:
Mine is all natural gas. It was a requirement. It isn’t available everywhere in Florida and some developers go all electric to sell it as green.


JEA prices aren't as high as other areas, I think. When it comes to my comfort, I say screw da planet... winter house is set to 68 heat and summer it's 74 cool. My bill has never been over $250-ish with the AC humming 24 hours a day in summer... and that's for power and water.
Users browsing this topic
Guest