America's #1 Online Cigar Auction
first, best, biggest!

Last post 21 years ago by cliffie3d. 11 replies replies.
torano 1959's
Jump to Bottom | Previous Topic | Next Topic
cef4093 Offline
#1 Posted: Tue, Nov 26 2002, 4:13 PM EST
Joined: 01-16-2002
Posts: 13
Can I get any feedback on the torano exodus 1959's. Are they really as good as the ratings.
huskey Offline
#2 Posted: Tue, Nov 26 2002, 4:21 PM EST
Joined: 11-09-2001
Posts: 275
Not sure what they have been "rated" but I have a box of the robusto and like them a lot. Good construction and a good smoke. In my regular rotation.

Clark
eleltea Offline
#3 Posted: Tue, Nov 26 2002, 4:23 PM EST
Joined: 03-03-2002
Posts: 4,562
The 1959 torpedo is as pretty a cigar as you ever did see, and smokes good, too. Cliffie should give a report on one soon.
SteveS Offline
#4 Posted: Tue, Nov 26 2002, 4:27 PM EST
Joined: 01-13-2002
Posts: 8,751
I have NO idea what the ratings are ... I pay ZERO attention to them. I can, however, tell you that IMNSHO, this is a very good full-bodied cigar ... I had one just this past Sunday evening and loved every fraction of an inch.
rookie139 Offline
#5 Posted: Tue, Nov 26 2002, 11:13 PM EST
Joined: 03-02-2000
Posts: 2,149
I like em, but I would classify them (IMHO of course) as a medium bodied cigar..I tend to lean toward fuller bodied cigars, so I traded the ten I had left (and the box) to a great member of another board...He sent me about fifteen fuller bodied cigars that are all my favorites! :P
They have a fairly complex flavor to them!...The wrapper is unbelievably smooth and "milk chocolately" looking (???)
cliffie3d Offline
#6 Posted: Mon, Dec 2 2002, 4:48 AM EST
Joined: 07-17-2002
Posts: 297
"Milk-chocolately", I'm not sure, but the one I smoked last night (THANKS, LT!) was definitely good. I actually prefer the Signature Series, though (thanks again, LT!), but I've heard quite a few say they prefer the Exodus 1959's. If you like 'em, you ought to check out the new Exodus Silver. I don't know much about them, but I think they're supposed to be more full-bodied than the 1959's.
dhofer22 Offline
#7 Posted: Mon, Dec 2 2002, 9:02 AM EST
Joined: 04-14-2002
Posts: 192
my money goes to the Signature Series, but that is just me.
Santyth Offline
#8 Posted: Wed, Dec 4 2002, 10:10 PM EST
Joined: 11-17-2002
Posts: 107
Hmmm. I'm sitting here smoking my first '59 right now, and I'm not sure what to think yet. It seemed spicey at first, but right now seems kind of flat.

How does this trade thing work? I may want to trade the other 4 away for some maduros.
shammill Offline
#9 Posted: Sat, Dec 7 2002, 8:12 AM EST
Joined: 02-22-2002
Posts: 10
All of the Toranos are pretty good. The 1959 is the fullest body, the silver is lighter, and the signature is similar to an AF Chateau Fuente SG.
eleltea Offline
#10 Posted: Sat, Dec 7 2002, 5:45 PM EST
Joined: 03-03-2002
Posts: 4,562
Funny how tastes differ. If I didn't like the 1959's better than the Sigs, Cliffie would never have ended up with my Sigs in trade. CA loves 'em, Cliffie loves 'em, almost everybody loves 'em, and I tried to but just don't. Vivre la differénce!
jd1 Offline
#11 Posted: Sun, Dec 8 2002, 7:08 PM EST
Joined: 02-14-2001
Posts: 3,118
Got the 59s in my regular rotation; nice medium to full body; good burn and flavor.
cliffie3d Offline
#12 Posted: Mon, Dec 9 2002, 5:22 AM EST
Joined: 07-17-2002
Posts: 297
Yep, I loves 'em! Thanks out to LT.
Users browsing this topic
Guest
Back to Top