Recent PostsForum Rules
Next Topic Sign In to ReplyPrev Topic
Poll Question : Do you regret taking the shot?
ChoiceVotesStatistics
Yes516 %
No1550 %
I didn't fall for it1033 %
Total30100%

FirstPrev1234NextLast
Fauci Ouchie...
1. Author: MACSDate: Wed, 12/14/2022, 9:01AM EST
What say you people? Young, healthy adults dropping dead with unknown heart conditions... myocarditis becoming an issue, as well as blood clots in lungs and other body parts.

Public health issues don't use shame based tactics, weaponize fear, silence dissenting voices, discourage questions, discredit those who disagree, or require 24/7/365 news coverage.

Discuss...
2. Author: SunoverbeachDate: Wed, 12/14/2022, 9:39AM EST
Took it. Nothing bad happened. Not my favorite experiment with drugs. Prolly won't do again

I don't see a "meh" option above
3. Author: SunoverbeachDate: Wed, 12/14/2022, 9:41AM EST
Only one sock goes missing because if they both did, you wouldn't notice
4. Author: HockeyDadDate: Wed, 12/14/2022, 9:41AM EST
People should get medical advice from their doctors, not from the government.

Under a new law in California, doctors that give ‘Rona advice that is contrary to “contemporary scientific consensus” can lose their medical license. The “contemporary scientific consensus“ is determined by the government through the Medical Board of California.

Sooooo….people are required by the government to get medical advice that is approved by the government.

5. Author: SunoverbeachDate: Wed, 12/14/2022, 9:46AM EST
I'm pleased this policy was put in place after leeching was no longer in vogue
6. Author: HockeyDadDate: Wed, 12/14/2022, 9:47AM EST
I think Fauci said leeching could help with long Covid symptoms.
7. Author: DrafterXDate: Wed, 12/14/2022, 9:50AM EST
I think it would be good for high blood pressure too... Mellow
8. Author: SunoverbeachDate: Wed, 12/14/2022, 9:51AM EST
Some studies indicate a possible link to anemic side effects in very rare cases
9. Author: RayRDate: Wed, 12/14/2022, 9:53AM EST
I've heard some Progressives say "government knows best what's good for you" because your government was sanctioned by sacred duhmocracy.
Naturally, that deranged line of thinking gives impetus to that California law.
10. Author: MACSDate: Wed, 12/14/2022, 9:57AM EST
I doubt people will actually admit they have reservations or regrets now. It'd be like saying... "Yeah, they got me... I was duped."

It's been 2+ years. Where are the short term studies on the safety and efficacy?
11. Author: HockeyDadDate: Wed, 12/14/2022, 10:03AM EST
I got duped. I was promised “vax up or mask up” and the “vaccine is our ticket out”. I took medical advice from my government, not my doctor. My first two doses were from a MASH unit. I had three total doses and then caught ‘Rona. Same story for my wife.

My brother currently has ‘Rona. He’s had 5 doses of “vaccine”.
12. Author: BuckyB93Date: Wed, 12/14/2022, 11:05AM EST
Didn't get the shot(s). Two in my household got the shots along with the boosters and they still caught the Rona. I didn't catch it (as far as I know).

I remember being a bit lethargic for about a week during that time but that's about it. Working at Wally World among the masses all through the pandemic and having two in my household catching it, it'd be hard to believe that I have not been exposed to it. Maybe I did and my body's defenses were able to fight it off naturally (shrug?).

Might just be anecdotal but those are the facts of my situation. I've been skeptical of all the COVID fear factor and the miracle cure vaccine stuff all along. My position and thoughts on this has been pretty clear and I haven't seen anything warrants a change in that position. I think it's been a bastardization of real science with propaganda, scare tactics along with the government and media driving it rather than real science.

Those that pumped themselves up as "experts" on the topic and bashed those that didn't drink the Kool-Aid have quietly slipped away out of the limelight. Maybe just too afraid to accept and admit that they were wrong.
13. Author: KrazeehorseDate: Wed, 12/14/2022, 12:30PM EST
I got the first two. My initial shot was while I was in the hospital for heart stuff. At the same time my BIL was on a vent with covid. He later succumbed to it. So my decision to take the first one was based on not wanting my wife to go through what her sister was going through. I thought it was worth the risk. She finally got hers and had some reactions that were unusual but weren't unique to her. So at that time we decided no more jabs. She is prepared to resign if that becomes a requirement for her employment.
14. Author: drglncDate: Wed, 12/14/2022, 12:37PM EST
Got the shots and the boosters, all recommended by my Dr. No issues or side affects i am aware of. I did get the virus at the end of this past summer but it wasn't any worse then the flu (which i also take the jab for annually). was the effect of the virus less because i was vaccinated? Maybe... Maybe not... did it take me over 2 years to catch it as far as i know because of masks and vaccines? Maybe... Maybe not... no regrets either way.
15. Author: DrMaddVibeDate: Wed, 12/14/2022, 1:05PM EST
I was forced to take it.

Damn them to hell forever.
16. Author: deadeyedickDate: Wed, 12/14/2022, 1:15PM EST
I didn't believe Fauci but when Trump went on TV and said to get the shots I ran right out and got three. Angel
17. Author: HockeyDadDate: Wed, 12/14/2022, 1:19PM EST
DrMaddVibe wrote:
I was forced to take it.

Damn them to hell forever.


I got caught up in that as well. I don’t regret taking it because later a Federal mandate came down that I had to take it so at least I didn’t have to panic scramble to get it.

When they told me two years later that it was never even tested to block transmission that’s when I knew I got really duped.
18. Author: RayRDate: Wed, 12/14/2022, 1:49PM EST
I didn't fall for it and nobody tried to force the jabs on me. I remembered these famous words by George Carlin “The government doesn’t lie, it engages in disinformation.“ and “I don’t believe anything the government tells me.“
19. Author: J&K11Date: Wed, 12/14/2022, 2:15PM EST
I would take a shot from a street hooker of heroin or whatever she put in there from a dirty needle before taking one of these "vaccines".
20. Author: rfenstDate: Wed, 12/14/2022, 5:58PM EST
Took the advice of my doctor. doc brother and my two doc neighbors (Infectious Disease and Immunology/Allergy) and am waiting two more weeks for the latest vaccine. I trust their advice. Certainly, there are risks to way. I have zero regrets.
21. Author: MACSDate: Wed, 12/14/2022, 6:02PM EST
Question: How was the CDC or FDA or the WHO or any one of the alphabet organizations able to declare this particular shot safe OR effective if it was never tested on humans until they started jabbing people?

It was just created in 2020, correct? So at best the current study (if they're even doing one that they'll share the data on) is 2+ years old. And why did they attempt to silence and disgrace the guy who created the mRNA technology? Dr. Robert Malone, I think his name is?

Why did they say Ivermectin was a horse dewormer when it has been used for other things? Why did they attempt to discredit hydroxychloroquine? Some doctors were having success with it if they administered it early enough.

Things that make ME go Hmmmm? I dunno about y'all.
22. Author: MACSDate: Wed, 12/14/2022, 6:06PM EST
rfenst wrote:
Took the advice of my doctor. doc brother and my two doc neighbors (Infectious Disease and Immunology/Allergy) and am waiting two more weeks for the latest vaccine. I trust their advice. Certainly, there are risks to way. I have zero regrets.


My doctor (at the time) said the same... get it. But I believe doctors were given marching orders and followed them out of fear of being stripped of their licenses.

Saw my new doc today... he offered both the covid shot and the flu shot. Nope and Nope.
23. Author: ZRX1200Date: Wed, 12/14/2022, 6:25PM EST
I trust the government! Solid take.

As I’m considered a “government contractor” in a way I was forced 2 jabs. After that I told them to make like Speyside and sniff their own farts.

Still curious what happens with the VA and with insurance once PHE officially ends (if ever). Also would like to see if Elon is blowing smoke or not about info dumps on Dr Fauci
24. Author: rfenstDate: Wed, 12/14/2022, 6:34PM EST
MACS wrote:
My doctor (at the time) said the same... get it. But I believe doctors were given marching orders and followed them out of fear of being stripped of their licenses.

Saw my new doc today... he offered both the covid shot and the flu shot. Nope and Nope.

To each his own.
25. Author: DrMaddVibeDate: Wed, 12/14/2022, 6:37PM EST
rfenst wrote:
To each his own.



As it should've been the entire time.
26. Author: HockeyDadDate: Wed, 12/14/2022, 7:17PM EST
rfenst wrote:
To each his own.


The greater good of the socialist experiment outweighed the opinions of the individual.

For unvaccinated, we are looking at a winter of severe illness and death — if you’re unvaccinated — for themselves, their families, and the hospitals they’ll soon overwhelm.
27. Author: ZRX1200Date: Wed, 12/14/2022, 7:43PM EST
And another season of zero flu cases.
28. Author: BrewhaDate: Wed, 12/14/2022, 7:51PM EST
MACS wrote:
Question: How was the CDC or FDA or the WHO or any one of the alphabet organizations able to declare this particular shot safe OR effective if it was never tested on humans until they started jabbing people?

It was just created in 2020, correct? So at best the current study (if they're even doing one that they'll share the data on) is 2+ years old. And why did they attempt to silence and disgrace the guy who created the mRNA technology? Dr. Robert Malone, I think his name is?

Why did they say Ivermectin was a horse dewormer when it has been used for other things? Why did they attempt to discredit hydroxychloroquine? Some doctors were having success with it if they administered it early enough.

Things that make ME go Hmmmm? I dunno about y'all.


Those are complex and difficult questions that I am not qualified to answer.
And you sir, are not qualified to ask.
29. Author: ZRX1200Date: Wed, 12/14/2022, 7:55PM EST
You don’t know, maybe he changed his party affiliation when he moved.
30. Author: rfenstDate: Wed, 12/14/2022, 7:57PM EST
Brewha wrote:
Those are complex and difficult questions that I am not qualified to answer.
And you sir, are not qualified to ask.

LOL!
Applause
31. Author: MACSDate: Wed, 12/14/2022, 8:21PM EST
ZRX1200 wrote:
You don’t know, maybe he changed his party affiliation when he moved.


OH SNAP! TWICE!

Burn and then the audacity to suggest I would ever associate myself with a terrorist organization! (trademark DMV)
32. Author: MACSDate: Wed, 12/14/2022, 8:24PM EST
Brewha wrote:
Those are complex and difficult questions that I am not qualified to answer.
And you sir, are not qualified to ask.


Say what?

I'm a free thinker, buddy... those were my original thoughts, too. How is anyone not qualified to ask a question? Especially of our Government?

That comment is proof that you, sir, are a lemming. Follow the herd to that cliff, brotha!
33. Author: BuckyB93Date: Wed, 12/14/2022, 10:33PM EST
Brewha wrote:
Those are complex and difficult questions that I am not qualified to answer.
And you sir, are not qualified to ask.


I'll give you the benefit of the doubt that you were being sarcastic otherwise you a pretty condescending a-hole (although there is plenty of evidence to support the latter).

FACT: The CDC changed the definition of a vaccine after it was proven that the COVID vaccine was not working out as planned or performed as they claimed.

FACT: The number of deaths as a result of COVID was overblown. In MA they redefined how to list a death as a result of COVID in Mach of 2022.

"We are adopting the new definition because we support the need to standardize the way COVID-19-associated deaths are counted,” said DPH State Epidemiologist Dr. Catherine Brown. “Prior to the CSTE definition, states did not have a nationally recommended definition for COVID-19 deaths and, as such, have been using a variety of processes and definitions to count their deaths. In Massachusetts, our definition has consistently been broader than most other states. After a deep dive into our data and reviewing thousands of death certificates we recognize that this updated definition gives us a truer picture of mortality associated with COVID-19.”

“It is important to understand that we cannot identify all COVID-19 deaths with 100 percent accuracy,” said Nicolas Menzies, Associate Professor of Global Health at the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health. “The revised definition for COVID-19 deaths is a reasonable balance between sensitivity and specificity and will make it easier to compare Massachusetts death data with data from other jurisdictions.”

“Updating this important metric is a necessary step to help us better gauge the current severity of the pandemic and its impact on our health system and society as a whole,” said Dr. Helen Boucher, Interim Dean of Tufts University School of Medicine, Chief Academic Officer at Tufts Medicine and infectious disease physician at Tufts Medical Center and member of the Governor’s Medical Advisory Board. “The ability to be nimble and quickly adapt to changing circumstances demonstrates Massachusetts’ continued leadership in COVID-19 data reporting and analysis.”

Early in the pandemic, and absent clear national guidance, DPH matched COVID-19 surveillance case information with death certificates to identify deaths in people who tested positive for the virus but did not have COVID listed as a cause of death. To avoid the possibility of missing any COVID-associated death, anyone who tested positive for COVID and died was counted as a COVID-associated death regardless of the length of time between their diagnosis and their death or whether COVID was listed as the cause on their death certificate. This approach was overly broad and led to an overcounting of COVID-19-associated deaths."

https://www.mass.gov/news/department-of-public-health-updates-covid-19-death-definition

FACT: The pharmaceutical companies and the FDA tried to get their research data on the "vaccine" sealed for over a generation. Well after most people alive now (the experimental subjects who were mandated to receive the experimental vaccine) have died off for one reason or another.

"In response to a Freedom of Information Act request, the Food and Drug Administration asked a federal judge for permission to make the public wait until the year 2096 to disclose all of the data it relied upon to license Pfizer’s Covid-19 vaccine.

That is not a typo. The FDA wanted court approval to have up to 75 years to publicly disclose this information."

https://news.bloomberglaw.com/health-law-and-business/why-a-judge-ordered-fda-to-release-covid-19-vaccine-data-pronto

Why? Something they don't want the public to know? Rightly so, a Federal Judge shot down that request.

These are just a few documented FACTS on how the CDC and other public health organization have been redefining things after they realized the cluster frank they created. Something is rotten in the state of Denmark.
34. Author: DrMaddVibeDate: Thu, 12/15/2022, 6:50AM EST
And the lies the man told...to the public and to Congress. I believe that to be the worst of all.

He needs to go. Fired and stripped of all benefits. Rotting in a prison cell. He funded the research. Moved it to other nations to get it all away from the eyes and ears of agencies that would rip it down. Some of those nations don't value the sanctity of human life. They were paid to create doomsday viruses by using Gain of Function to do it. Creating a weapon virus. Notice nobody is asking the "For Who?" of "For What?" or even the "Why?" questions?

The worst set of lies (and a reason at the beginning I KNEW this was a sham!) was his telling everyone masks were worthless with Covid. He was correct then. The boxes on them even said "Not For Medical Use"! Couldn't help himself though because the Fear Porn had to be ramped up to Orgy mode. You need to wear a mask. At all times then. In your own house even. How could anyone with a rational thinking brain believe this guy based on that? Then all the other absurdities that followed. Wear one mask. Wear 2 masks. Wear 3 masks. Have to carry a vaccine card to go into a restaurant? Wear a mask in the joint, but when you sit down they can come off. Like Covid was some thick gooey sticky ozone cloud that hovered at 4' 11" to 7'. All of the pics drifting on the interwebs of people coping with Covid in every day situations. People shopping in wetsuits and scuba tanks, gas masks and shower curtains, my personal fave was the guy with the horse mask and the Hazmat suit. I would die laughing at these until they popped up in the real world. It was then I knew the Psy Ops psychosis was real and people's minds were now "infected". It got so bad that they closed down schools. We were told children were immune to it. Then when they were allowed to come back to school they had to wear masks. Children. Our government went after children. All at Pope Fauci's direction. He never has backed off either. Still holding on to what he did just like the man I compared him to here on this site. Dr. Josef "Angel of Death" Mengele. The Nazi scientist that dared experiment on humans. Saw them as some commodity to be used and then sent to the gas chambers when the Party had extracted all usefulness from them. Nevermind that fact that this same demented man tried and failed to run the AIDS pandemic as well! Give him another turn at bat. He'll get a hit and people will cheer.

There were the infected people here too. "You're going to kill grandma!", "Follow the Science", "I've seen the Data", "If you knew what I know", "LOL", "I work in that field and I know" and the personal stories exaggerated for maximum effect on anyone unwilling to do any type of research on their own. Clinging on to their yarn because they were eating at the table of a Free Press that was spoon feeding them their daily dose of Panic. I even stated on here (I can't remember the thread) that I fully understand how an unwilling society complied with a guy like Hitler and his party of monsters. It was like a veil shrouded them from common sense and entitled them to some elevated sense of importance at the same time. A Free Press that gave us daily briefings and death tolls like something straight out of "1984". A dark and dank place where government is all and controls all. A Free Press that forgot what investigative journalism was because they were jockeying for position at the feet of the CDC, NIH, WHO and most importantly Pope Fauci. They wanted the blessings bestowed upon them because they were the Party faithful, doing the Party's deeds. To this day, they still act and believe they were right and that's why the "We're Sorry" stories tried to pop up. Nobody was buying it though. Nobody. The carnage they created is still too much and look at them go for the "prize" once again. California counties thinking of mandating masks again. I'm sure they'll get their way too. Why? The beatdown, abused and psychophants turned around in the past election and didn't rebuke the party for their misgivings, crimes and deeds. They voted them back in. They validated what they did. To them even. That's how damaged people are.

Mandating vaccines? We all knew it was a crime. The addled that still want to call the Covid shots a "vaccine"? Still will tell you they work and that they took it and would again. It's sad really. It's sad because the world we now live in...The Emperor isn't wearing any clothes, and the emperor is Hitler. Everyone is still seeing the magnificent clothes and telling anyone listening how grand they are. All the while some are waking up. Seeing them for what they are. Looking around at the street preachers for Fauci with a "WTF!" look on their faces. At the Nuremberg trials they convicted people of war crimes and crimes against Humanity. This is that same moment and some want to live still in their world.
35. Author: BrewhaDate: Thu, 12/15/2022, 11:06AM EST
MACS wrote:
Say what?

I'm a free thinker, buddy... those were my original thoughts, too. How is anyone not qualified to ask a question? Especially of our Government?

That comment is proof that you, sir, are a lemming. Follow the herd to that cliff, brotha!

Saying it another way; not everyone can ask a good legitimate question.

MACS wrote:
Question: How was the CDC or FDA or the WHO or any one of the alphabet organizations able to declare this particular shot safe OR effective if it was never tested on humans until they started jabbing people?


1 - the vaccines were tested in trial groups before the FDA approved them
2 - how could they be tested on humans without giving people a "jab"?

So, its not a question based on understanding the process for approval that did happen.

But it does suggest that the vaccines were released without being vetted - but they were vetted.
And that whole process is above both our pay grades.
36. Author: BrewhaDate: Thu, 12/15/2022, 11:19AM EST
BuckyB93 wrote:
I'll give you the benefit of the doubt that you were being sarcastic otherwise you a pretty condescending a-hole (although there is plenty of evidence to support the latter).

FACT: The CDC changed the definition of a vaccine after it was proven that the COVID vaccine was not working out as planned or performed as they claimed.

FACT: The number of deaths as a result of COVID was overblown. In MA they redefined how to list a death as a result of COVID in Mach of 2022.

"We are adopting the new definition because we support the need to standardize the way COVID-19-associated deaths are counted,” said DPH State Epidemiologist Dr. Catherine Brown. “Prior to the CSTE definition, states did not have a nationally recommended definition for COVID-19 deaths and, as such, have been using a variety of processes and definitions to count their deaths. In Massachusetts, our definition has consistently been broader than most other states. After a deep dive into our data and reviewing thousands of death certificates we recognize that this updated definition gives us a truer picture of mortality associated with COVID-19.”

“It is important to understand that we cannot identify all COVID-19 deaths with 100 percent accuracy,” said Nicolas Menzies, Associate Professor of Global Health at the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health. “The revised definition for COVID-19 deaths is a reasonable balance between sensitivity and specificity and will make it easier to compare Massachusetts death data with data from other jurisdictions.”

“Updating this important metric is a necessary step to help us better gauge the current severity of the pandemic and its impact on our health system and society as a whole,” said Dr. Helen Boucher, Interim Dean of Tufts University School of Medicine, Chief Academic Officer at Tufts Medicine and infectious disease physician at Tufts Medical Center and member of the Governor’s Medical Advisory Board. “The ability to be nimble and quickly adapt to changing circumstances demonstrates Massachusetts’ continued leadership in COVID-19 data reporting and analysis.”

Early in the pandemic, and absent clear national guidance, DPH matched COVID-19 surveillance case information with death certificates to identify deaths in people who tested positive for the virus but did not have COVID listed as a cause of death. To avoid the possibility of missing any COVID-associated death, anyone who tested positive for COVID and died was counted as a COVID-associated death regardless of the length of time between their diagnosis and their death or whether COVID was listed as the cause on their death certificate. This approach was overly broad and led to an overcounting of COVID-19-associated deaths."

https://www.mass.gov/news/department-of-public-health-updates-covid-19-death-definition

FACT: The pharmaceutical companies and the FDA tried to get their research data on the "vaccine" sealed for over a generation. Well after most people alive now (the experimental subjects who were mandated to receive the experimental vaccine) have died off for one reason or another.

"In response to a Freedom of Information Act request, the Food and Drug Administration asked a federal judge for permission to make the public wait until the year 2096 to disclose all of the data it relied upon to license Pfizer’s Covid-19 vaccine.

That is not a typo. The FDA wanted court approval to have up to 75 years to publicly disclose this information."

https://news.bloomberglaw.com/health-law-and-business/why-a-judge-ordered-fda-to-release-covid-19-vaccine-data-pronto

Why? Something they don't want the public to know? Rightly so, a Federal Judge shot down that request.

These are just a few documented FACTS on how the CDC and other public health organization have been redefining things after they realized the cluster frank they created. Something is rotten in the state of Denmark.


So, I was raised and trained to be a condescending a-hole. But I try not to be. We all have goals.

Not to argue any one of these particular facts, but what conclusion are you drawing?
A world wide conspiracy?
To what end?

Now I am not a epidemiologist. But enough family and friends were sick and/or in the hospital from COVID to know there is such a thing. We almost lost our daughter-in-law to Covid. And I have no real reason to doubt the vaccines.
37. Author: clintCigarDate: Thu, 12/15/2022, 11:23AM EST
Watch "BREAKING: Gov. DeSantis drops BOMBSHELL mRNA Pfizer vaccine news | Redacted with Clayton Morris" on YouTube
https://youtu.be/Th3NAHllWdQ
38. Author: DrMaddVibeDate: Thu, 12/15/2022, 11:31AM EST
Brewha wrote:




1 - the vaccines were tested in trial groups before the FDA approved them
2 - how could they be tested on humans without giving people a "jab"?

So, its not a question based on understanding the process for approval that did happen.

But it does suggest that the vaccines were released without being vetted - but they were vetted.
And that whole process is above both our pay grades.



You're going to hate this then. Another linked story with truth you don't want to know.


Judicial Watch Releases Damning New Information on the Moderna Vaccine



News has come out regarding the Moderna COVID-19 vaccine, courtesy of Judicial Watch. The watchdog group announced yesterday that it had obtained records from a FOIA lawsuit against the Food and Drug Administration, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and the National Institute for Allergy and Infectious Disease. The entities had failed to respond to a FOIA request filed in June of 2021 regarding “the biodistribution studies and related data for the Pfizer, Moderna and Johnson& Johnson COVID vaccines.”

Judicial Watch said that the records contained information…

…regarding data Moderna submitted to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) on its mRNA COVID-19 vaccine, which indicate a “statistically significant” number of rats were born with skeletal deformations after their mothers were injected with the vaccine. The documents also reveal Moderna elected not to conduct a number of standard pharmacological studies on the laboratory test animals.

Moderna submitted a Nonclinical Overview to the FDA to have its vaccine approved. Included in that overview was information that rats born to mothers that had been given the mRNA vaccine had skeletal abnormalities that included conditions such as “rib nodules” and “wavy ribs.” Moderna said the conditions were not considered “adverse.”

Whether or not this is significant for pregnant mothers who took the jab more than likely remains to be seen. In October of this year, the CDC said that COVID-19 vaccines were recommended for people six months and older, including pregnant and nursing mothers and women who are trying to become pregnant. According to the agency, getting COVID-19 could result in complications that could affect pregnancy and a baby’s development.

The point is that Moderna should have told us about the issue with the bone problems in the rats, and the FDA and CDC certainly should have told us. I believe that is called allowing people to make informed decisions about their bodies. And last I checked, that was a very important issue for many.

During the pandemic, the public was urged again and again to get their vaccines, boosters, and third boosters. Even today, we are still being told to get yet another booster. It has even been billed as an important part of our holiday preparations. As I mentioned in another piece, my wife is still being asked how soon the next generation of jabs will be released.

Fortune recently featured an article that talked about a study in the American Journal of Medicine. The upshot of the Canadian study is this: people who opted out of the jab were 72% more likely to get into an auto accident. The theory is that such people distrust their governments. This, in turn, might also mean that they will ignore basic traffic safety rules. The authors of the paper went so far as to suggest that doctors talk with unvaccinated patients about safe driving and that insurance companies take vaccination status into account when it comes to issuing or renewing policies.

Earlier in December, the website News@Northeasten ran a piece highlighting a study by Northeastern physics professor Mauricio Santillana. Santillana, who specializes in epidemiology, worked with a team of researchers who tracked deaths from COVID-19 during the initial year of the pandemic. In a nutshell, the group found…

…that deaths spiked in well-connected, Democrat-heavy cities early in 2020, but that by the first pandemic winter, deaths were about three times higher in Republican-leaning—and specifically Trump-leaning—areas of the country.

So, as Gavin Newsom’s administration once said, “Vax for The Win.” Maybe. On the other hand, you could vax for myocarditis and children with bone deformities. But those details aren’t important. Line up, citizen. Get your shot, preserve your credit score, and keep your insurance rates low. Never mind those pesky rats. It’ll all work out. You have Biden’s and Fauci’s word on it.

https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politics/lincolnbrown/2022/12/14/judicial-watch-releases-new-information-on-the-moderna-vaccine-n1653605


I don't profess to hold a doctorate, but I'm not a moron.


39. Author: MACSDate: Thu, 12/15/2022, 4:09PM EST
Brewha wrote:
Saying it another way; not everyone can ask a good legitimate question.



1 - the vaccines were tested in trial groups before the FDA approved them
2 - how could they be tested on humans without giving people a "jab"?

So, its not a question based on understanding the process for approval that did happen.

But it does suggest that the vaccines were released without being vetted - but they were vetted.
And that whole process is above both our pay grades.



Covid issue starts in March 2020. Pfizer shot released to the public in Dec 2020. So, yeah... tell me exactly how you do ACTUAL clinical trials in 9 months?

Obviously people have to get the jab to test it... but then you have to collect data on short term and long term side effects. They did all that in 9 short months? Musta been pure fkn magic.
40. Author: RayRDate: Thu, 12/15/2022, 5:04PM EST
Nothing deters LEFTY from spreading the BIG LIE.
The truth be damned...FULL SPEED AHEAD!

Biden Covid Czar Claims Getting Updated Vaccine Will Prevent Nearly All Covid Deaths – But Data Proves Otherwise

By Jim Hoft
Published December 15, 2022 at 3:00pm

Quote:
On Thursday, White House Coronavirus Response Coordinator Dr. Ashish Jha joined Karine Jean-Pierre in encouraging Americans to get their updated vaccine as the winter holidays draw near.

Jha suggested that nearly all COVID deaths in the U.S. could be prevented if everyone received the updated vaccine and followed the prescribed course of treatment.

“So far nationally in our analysis of the data, death numbers are just beginning to rise,” said Jha during the press briefing.

“We obviously want to make sure that does not go any further. We know we can prevent nearly every death from COVID if people get their updated vaccines and people get treated. So we continue to press that message.”

Jha went on to say, “The most important thing Americans can do is to go get their updated COVID-19 vaccine right away.”

There is not evidence to support this. As a matter of fact, vaccinated people now account for a majority of COVID deaths.

More...

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/12/biden-covid-czar-claims-getting-updated-vaccine-will-prevent-nearly-covid-death-data-proves-otherwise/
41. Author: rfenstDate: Thu, 12/15/2022, 5:20PM EST
Why are those here who are so against the shot complaining about the doses they were unwilling to get and never had? This is not the only thing most nonbelievers here are so critical of the government about. Haven't we passed the point in time in society where it is a personal/medical decision for which no one is right or wrong about getting it?
42. Author: zitotczitoDate: Thu, 12/15/2022, 5:24PM EST
I just had a good friend get Covid and was in the hospital for 4 weeks, he was unvaccinated. I have had 2 jabs and two boosters at the recommendation of my Doctor and other then the first shot, no side effects.

My thoughts in the beginning were that I did not believe everything the government was telling me. Considering that the testing period was so short, I figured that the jab did not kill any way near what Covid was doing so it was worth the gamble. I have had the Rona twice and both times it was like having a mild cold. So I feel for me, getting the jab was a good choice as I was never in the hospital from the Rona.

While my decision was based on personal reasons, I was always against the jab being forced on people, period.
43. Author: HockeyDadDate: Thu, 12/15/2022, 5:34PM EST
rfenst wrote:
Haven't we passed the point in time in society where it is a personal/medical decision for which no one is right or wrong about getting it?


No. There are still many Covid vaccine mandates in place At Federal, state, county, and city levels.
44. Author: RayRDate: Thu, 12/15/2022, 5:44PM EST
rfenst wrote:
Why are those here who are so against the shot complaining about the doses they were unwilling to get and never had? This is not the only thing most nonbelievers here are so critical of the government about. Haven't we passed the point in time in society where it is a personal/medical decision for which no one is right or wrong about getting it?


I don't complain about the jabs I didn't get. I'm critical of the government because of the obvious and constant LIES they tell me. We've reached a point in time in society where it is obvious that it is in decline.
45. Author: JGKAMINDate: Thu, 12/15/2022, 6:07PM EST
rfenst wrote:
Why are those here who are so against the shot complaining about the doses they were unwilling to get and never had? This is not the only thing most nonbelievers here are so critical of the government about. Haven't we passed the point in time in society where it is a personal/medical decision for which no one is right or wrong about getting it?

Because some were forced to as a condition of employment. Get the shots or lose your job would be enough to make people complain. If your vaccine passport wasn’t complete you weren’t free to do many normal things in life like traveling, dining, shopping, etc…to get to a point and look back and realize how much of a joke it all was. And what ever happened to the daily Covid death toll tracker? We used to see it everywhere nonstop and the POTUS blamed for all of them, then come January 2021 somebody else takes over, more people died from Covid under his watch, and no more death tracker nor fault put on the POTUS?! Eh?
46. Author: MACSDate: Thu, 12/15/2022, 6:17PM EST
RayR wrote:
I don't complain about the jabs I didn't get. I'm critical of the government because of the obvious and constant LIES they tell me. We've reached a point in time in society where it is obvious that it is in decline.


THIS.

And the fact that people I love were duped and got the jab. I'm worried about their long term well-being. I'm sure that's very easy to understand, no?
47. Author: BrewhaDate: Thu, 12/15/2022, 7:03PM EST
rfenst wrote:
Why are those here who are so against the shot complaining about the doses they were unwilling to get and never had?


I think Spencer Tracy put it best:

“Because fanaticism and ignorance is forever busy, and needs feeding.”

I really can’t improve on that…
48. Author: BrewhaDate: Thu, 12/15/2022, 7:11PM EST
MACS wrote:
Covid issue starts in March 2020. Pfizer shot released to the public in Dec 2020. So, yeah... tell me exactly how you do ACTUAL clinical trials in 9 months?

Obviously people have to get the jab to test it... but then you have to collect data on short term and long term side effects. They did all that in 9 short months? Musta been pure fkn magic.


The FDA allowed an accelerated test cycle because of a…..”pandemic”.
Read: “in order to save lives”.

What you you have done?
Hold a 5-10 year trial?

Hell, why do you care? You don’t believe in vaccines anyway.

And don’t say it’s because you care about your fellow man - we crossed that bridge right here in river city.
49. Author: DrMaddVibeDate: Thu, 12/15/2022, 7:30PM EST
JGKAMIN wrote:
Because some were forced to as a condition of employment. Get the shots or lose your job would be enough to make people complain. If your vaccine passport wasn’t complete you weren’t free to do many normal things in life like traveling, dining, shopping, etc…to get to a point and look back and realize how much of a joke it all was. And what ever happened to the daily Covid death toll tracker? We used to see it everywhere nonstop and the POTUS blamed for all of them, then come January 2021 somebody else takes over, more people died from Covid under his watch, and no more death tracker nor fault put on the POTUS?! Eh?


+1
50. Author: SunoverbeachDate: Thu, 12/15/2022, 8:12PM EST
Anyone who questions why you're shoveling 6in of snow in the middle of a snowstorm hasn't shoveled 16in of snow at the end of a snowstorm
FirstPrev1234NextLast
Sign In to Reply
Next TopicJump to TopPrev Topic