HockeyDad
15 years ago
By the way, Beef Wellington is a rip-off off filet de bœuf en croûte.

Wannabe food outrage.
FuzzNJ
15 years ago

By the way, Beef Wellington is a rip-off off filet de bœuf en croûte.

Wannabe food outrage.

HockeyDad wrote:



Yeah, every recipe is a ripoff, variation or interpretation of something else in some way. Not gonna lose any sleep over it.
HockeyDad
15 years ago
Well have a nice Easter weekend.

http://fireboy48.files.wordpress.com/2010/12/jesus-ar15.jpg 

He still loves you even if you are ripping off his eggs.
FuzzNJ
15 years ago

Well have a nice Easter weekend.

http://fireboy48.files.wordpress.com/2010/12/jesus-ar15.jpg 

He still loves you even if you are ripping off his eggs.

HockeyDad wrote:



WTF does colored eggs have to do with the supposed resurrection of Jesus? I'm ripping off nothing from Jesus, that's a tradition from the pagans.
chiefburg
15 years ago

It's not really a missing link that scientists are looking for, though the term is still used:

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/evolution/7550033/Missing-link-between-man-and-apes-found.html 

http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2009/may/19/ida-fossil-missing-link 

The term used more is transitional fossils and here are some.

http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/faq-transitional.html 

And yes, more data is always added as it is found and studied, as I've said, as science defines it and as everyone here seems to not want to accept. There is no final answer to everything, and there probably will never be. Not every thing that dies makes a fossil and the earth is over 4 billion years old. Not gonna find everything and it can't be observed unless on invents a time machine, so I guess that means god did it. /sigh

FuzzNJ wrote:


Fuzz: I wasn't suggesting that God did it - I merely pointed out that too many pieces of the puzzle are missing - important pieces required by creationism. I have to blindly believe those pieces existed and didn't leave a fossil much the same way I would for a God. Still, it is curious why the most important link-type pieces are missing.

Save your links.....I know how to Google and read. One important thing I've discovered is not to believe everything I read on the internet. Never seen Maddow nor do I watch ANY of the news networks (zero, zilch) and I don't watch/listen to ANY of the talk show crazies.....

Oh, and you've got me pegged wrong as well - I am not a Christian Conservative......haven't been to a church (other than a wedding) in 35 years.......

I was only trying to point out that we don't know everything nor can we prove any of it. As such, one is left to believe what they want to believe. I respect your right to your beliefs - but that doesn't necessarily make them right.
FuzzNJ
15 years ago

Fuzz: I wasn't suggesting that God did it - I merely pointed out that too many pieces of the puzzle are missing - important pieces required by creationism. I have to blindly believe those pieces existed and didn't leave a fossil much the same way I would for a God. Still, it is curious why the most important link-type pieces are missing.

Save your links.....I know how to Google and read. One important thing I've discovered is not to believe everything I read on the internet. Never seen Maddow nor do I watch ANY of the news networks (zero, zilch) and I don't watch/listen to ANY of the talk show crazies.....

Oh, and you've got me pegged wrong as well - I am not a Christian Conservative......haven't been to a church (other than a wedding) in 35 years.......

I was only trying to point out that we don't know everything nor can we prove any of it. As such, one is left to believe what they want to believe. I respect your right to your beliefs - but that doesn't necessarily make them right.

chiefburg wrote:



Of course pieces of the puzzle are missing, been saying that all along and haven't ever said otherwise. Don't know why you keep arguing the same point.

'important pieces required by creationism' what does that mean? That the missing pieces can only be filled by creationism? If so, that's a huge jump in logic, and a logical fallacy at that.

There is reason to blindly believe anything and no one on my side of the issue is asking you to, seriously, quit saying it and quit believing it. It's wrong, it's a lie, it's not true, I can't emphasize this enough.

You don't trust anything on the internet? That's crazy talk. You can't determine whether or not a source is reliable?

STOP SAYING WE DON'T KNOW EVERYTHING AND CAN'T PROVE EVERYTHING! THAT IS NOT A DISAGREEMENT AT ALL WITH ANYONE! Clear?
chiefburg
15 years ago

Of course pieces of the puzzle are missing, been saying that all along and haven't ever said otherwise. Don't know why you keep arguing the same point.

'important pieces required by creationism' what does that mean? That the missing pieces can only be filled by creationism? If so, that's a huge jump in logic, and a logical fallacy at that.

There is reason to blindly believe anything and no one on my side of the issue is asking you to, seriously, quit saying it and quit believing it. It's wrong, it's a lie, it's not true, I can't emphasize this enough.

You don't trust anything on the internet? That's crazy talk. You can't determine whether or not a source is reliable?

STOP SAYING WE DON'T KNOW EVERYTHING AND CAN'T PROVE EVERYTHING! THAT IS NOT A DISAGREEMENT AT ALL WITH ANYONE! Clear?

FuzzNJ wrote:


Thanks Fuzz - thanks for squaring me away. I was wrong, have always been wrong and will never be right. You are right, have always been right and will always be right. Forgive me for trying to have an intelligent conversation with you. I guess you are missing the point I'm trying to make and you keep coming back with silly, childish posts. I have have more intelligent, stimulating converstaions with 6th graders. SERIOUSLY!

Go do whatever it is you do......
FuzzNJ
15 years ago

Thanks Fuzz - thanks for squaring me away. I was wrong, have always been wrong and will never be right. You are right, have always been right and will always be right. Forgive me for trying to have an intelligent conversation with you. I guess you are missing the point I'm trying to make and you keep coming back with silly, childish posts. I have have more intelligent, stimulating converstaions with 6th graders. SERIOUSLY!

Go do whatever it is you do......

chiefburg wrote:




You have said:

"You are still a disguntled person who believes he knows the answers to everything."

another post:

"Personally, I don't necessarily know what is true and what isn't true and I don't believe anyone living fully knows (except for Fuzz)."

"Science, as Fuzz likes to quote, still hasn't proved our complete origins."

again

"I merely pointed out that too many pieces of the puzzle are missing"
"I was only trying to point out that we don't know everything"

each and every time I have agreed that no one has all the answers to it all, each and every time, I finally put it in capital letters and you say:

"I guess you are missing the point I'm trying to make and you keep coming back with silly, childish posts."

What?

You said there are no 'missing links'. I provided you with a link that shows evidence that many, many have been found, and you said:

"Save your links"

and continued to say that there are none.

"I find it odd that the scientists have never found "the missing link" that supposedly connects man to fish."

There are no transitional fossils that will ever show the transition directly from fish to man because that's not what happened.

And I'm the one that's stubborn and childish? It's one thing to have your own opinion, you are welcome to it, you just aren't entitled to make up your own facts.
hank56
  • hank56
  • Herf-A-Holic Topic Starter
15 years ago

Of course pieces of the puzzle are missing, been saying that all along and haven't ever said otherwise. Don't know why you keep arguing the same point.

'important pieces required by creationism' what does that mean? That the missing pieces can only be filled by creationism? If so, that's a huge jump in logic, and a logical fallacy at that.

There is reason to blindly believe anything and no one on my side of the issue is asking you to, seriously, quit saying it and quit believing it. It's wrong, it's a lie, it's not true, I can't emphasize this enough.

You don't trust anything on the internet? That's crazy talk. You can't determine whether or not a source is reliable?

STOP SAYING WE DON'T KNOW EVERYTHING AND CAN'T PROVE EVERYTHING! THAT IS NOT A DISAGREEMENT AT ALL WITH ANYONE! Clear?

FuzzNJ wrote:




That is not what he typed and you know it. I have read a good number of your posts in the past where you point out that others misquote you, take statements out of context etc. Post by the same standard please.
FuzzNJ
15 years ago

That is not what he typed and you know it. I have read a good number of your posts in the past where you point out that others misquote you, take statements out of context etc. Post by the same standard please.

hank56 wrote:



You're right. He did say, "One important thing I've discovered is not to believe everything I read on the internet." but also said earlier that I believed everything I read on the internet.

My phrasing wasn't as exact as it should have been and I should have probably asked him why my sources were not 'acceptable' to him.

Just once it would great to see someone looking for some imprecise wording from someone else perhaps. People seem to like to grade my posts.
Whistlebritches
15 years ago


Just once it would great to see someone looking for some imprecise wording from someone else perhaps. People seem to like to grade my posts.

FuzzNJ wrote:




As usual it's all about YOU.Again YOU feel victimized.I bet YOU cry for a week out of every month during YOUR period.

Fuzz do YOU have anything better to do all day than sit around trying to convince us what a f*cking idiot YOU are?????Inquiring minds and all that sheet.


Ron
Users browsing this topic