HockeyDad
Thursday, August 4, 2011 7:22:22 AM

On the flip side of the coin..........OJ was found innocent. SO that makes him innocent too, right HD?

nickatnite wrote:

Unless you were on the jury, it is not your place to decide.

DrafterX
Thursday, August 4, 2011 8:57:07 AM
someone should start a poll.... 😟
TMCTLT
Thursday, August 4, 2011 9:17:55 AM

You asked when the last time your car smelled like a corpse....but you're ready to convict because "they say" there was a corpse but couldn't prove it.

HockeyDad wrote:

If I had been on that jury yes I would have convicted her Azz, many people sentenced without the proverbial smoking gun!!! Her behavior was/is more than questionable, and you'll forgive me but just a bit too coincidental that the childs remains were found very close to where the little wench buried a family pet. And Robert, your profession has turned our legal and judicial system into exactly what it's become.

A laughing stock Barnum and Baily kind of circus....just shameful IMO Not meant as a personal poke @ you BTW

TMCTLT
Thursday, August 4, 2011 9:20:21 AM

Unless you were on the jury, it is not your place to decide.

HockeyDad wrote:

I have a dumb question, if she's Not guilty and they lacked sound evidence.....how is it they were able to keep her imprisoned for three years before the trial? Hmmmm 🤔

teedubbya
Thursday, August 4, 2011 9:38:39 AM

If I had been on that jury yes I would have convicted her Azz

TMCTLT wrote:

Thus you would never be on the jury. You decided the case on something other than evidence presented in court and jury instructions. Emotion rather than fact applied through a controlled process.

It's not perfect, and that is intentional.

teedubbya
Thursday, August 4, 2011 9:40:50 AM

I have a dumb question, if she's Not guilty and they lacked sound evidence.....how is it they were able to keep her imprisoned for three years before the trial? Hmmmm 🤔

TMCTLT wrote:

Lots of people spend time in the pokey during thier trial. I think you are smart enough to know the burdon of evidence to arrest someone is different than what is needed to convict someone. Using your logic there is never any reason for a trial. Once arrested we should go straight to sentancing.

As for the smell in her trunk maybe she has a yeast infection that migrated to the rear.

HockeyDad
Thursday, August 4, 2011 9:49:49 AM

I have a dumb question, if she's Not guilty and they lacked sound evidence.....how is it they were able to keep her imprisoned for three years before the trial? Hmmmm 🤔

TMCTLT wrote:

Because there was enough evidence to stand trial, she was denied bail, and waived her right to a speedy trial. We got laws, constitutions, and amendments that cover all that.

Your logic would dictate that if someone is arrested, they must be guilty. We have a jury selection process to keep that kind of mindset off juries and leave it for the Nancy Grace Fan Club.

TMCTLT
Thursday, August 4, 2011 9:59:24 AM

Thus you would never be on the jury. You decided the case on something other than evidence presented in court and jury instructions. Emotion rather than fact applied through a controlled process.

It's not perfect, and that is intentional.

teedubbya wrote:

Thank goodness I'll never be on a jury, I prefer not to take part in something as corrupt as our legal system.......

We have a jury selection process to keep that kind of mindset off juries and leave it for the Nancy Grace Fan Club.

HD, , yes and everyone knows there's no bias or gamemanship while selecting juries in our courts......](*,)

Save your breath.....

teedubbya
Thursday, August 4, 2011 10:01:03 AM

Thank goodness I'll never be on a jury, I prefer not to take part in something as corrupt as our legal system.......

TMCTLT wrote:

Yes I am quite sure you are above it all.

TMCTLT
Thursday, August 4, 2011 10:03:24 AM

Yes I am quite sure you are above it all.

teedubbya wrote:

Yes thank you I am.......but by all means carry on with your supreme logic

teedubbya
Thursday, August 4, 2011 10:04:03 AM

Yes thank you I am.......but by all means carry on with your supreme logic

TMCTLT wrote:

lol

DrafterX
Thursday, August 4, 2011 10:04:56 AM
you ok Paul..?? 😕

teedubbya
Thursday, August 4, 2011 10:05:42 AM

you ok Paul..?? 😕

DrafterX wrote:

The Walrus is dead

DrafterX
Thursday, August 4, 2011 10:07:03 AM
poor Walrus.... 😞
TMCTLT
Thursday, August 4, 2011 10:08:10 AM

you ok Paul..?? 😕

DrafterX wrote:

In what sense William? As in....have I gone crazy......I dunno maybe, but if so I'll be fitting right in here soon!!!! lol

teedubbya
Thursday, August 4, 2011 10:08:16 AM

poor Walrus.... 😞

DrafterX wrote:

Yea. I played rubber soul backwards and it clearly says "the walrus is CROS"

DrafterX
Thursday, August 4, 2011 10:09:16 AM

In what sense William? As in....have I gone crazy......I dunno maybe, but if so I'll be fitting right in here soon!!!! lol

TMCTLT wrote:

🤣

DrafterX
Thursday, August 4, 2011 10:09:52 AM

Yea. I played rubber soul backwards and it clearly says "the walrus is CROS"

teedubbya wrote:

no way man.... 🤐 🤐

teedubbya
Thursday, August 4, 2011 10:09:59 AM
keep in mind this is a would you hit it thread. Nothing too serious.
HockeyDad
Thursday, August 4, 2011 10:20:40 AM
TMCTLT hates America and our legal system and would deny Casey Anthony the right to get laid now that she is free.