FuzzNJ
14 years ago

The topic was Federal Income Tax.

HockeyDad wrote:



I'm quite aware of that. By just using Federal Income Tax though it skews the overall tax burden results, something those on the right are doing in an attempt to make a political point rather than a sound fiscal policy suggestion.
FuzzNJ
14 years ago



not to mention, The cost of preparing for each audit was about $5k each,,,

wheelrite wrote:



Either you don't keep good records or that figure is a lie.
FuzzNJ
14 years ago

Btw,

Fuzz and Brewha,,

you do realize Obama is proposimg eliminating your Mortagage Interst deduction and Fuzz,your State income Tax deduction too.

wheelrite wrote:



I don't think I am special.
FuzzNJ
14 years ago

My point is Our resident Bleeding Hearts think it's not about them..

wheelrite wrote:



Another strange misperception on your part.
FuzzNJ
14 years ago

You made the assumption that they own a home and pay state income taxes.

HockeyDad wrote:



Are you making an assumption that we don't?
FuzzNJ
14 years ago

Actually I think that 47% of households don't pay Federal Income Tax is an IRS published statistic.

You're trying to blur it with talk of property and sales taxes that some little old lady pays.

Why should a disabled vet or a little old lady or kids whose parents were killed not have to pay their fair share of taxes?

HockeyDad wrote:



You can't bring up 'fair' if you don't believe in the concept. Besides what would be fair for a person on a limited income above and beyond the other taxes they are responsible for? Let's say they take in 15k a year in a fixed income. What you are advocating is taking more from that person who is barely making it while not asking someone who takes in 1000% more.
HockeyDad
14 years ago

I'm quite aware of that. By just using Federal Income Tax though it skews the overall tax burden results, something those on the right are doing in an attempt to make a political point rather than a sound fiscal policy suggestion.

FuzzNJ wrote:




Well DUH!


If anyone made sound fiscal policy decisions we wouldn't have $15 trillion in debt!
Brewha
14 years ago

Your preferred method of achieving equity and balance is to use punishment. You just don't want to call it that because it makes you look like a greedy baztard.

HockeyDad wrote:



Punishment = paying taxes.
Oh – now I see the “point”.

And that would be "godless, greedy baztard". (just helpin ya out).

It is a privilege for an American to support his country. That’s why so many serve and give their lives. It is sad that you see people doing their part as punishment.
FuzzNJ
14 years ago

Social Security is already Taxed and Clinton increased that Tax.

wheelrite wrote:



I thought you said poor people don't pay taxes?


A College loan is just that a loan,pay it back...

wheelrite wrote:



duh. One issue is that congress thought that the private banking industry could do a 'better' job than government with regards to student loans and let them make the rules as to how much interest they could charge making a college loan much much more difficult to repay.


Billionaires have already payed income tax on the money they've invested.That's why they pay Cap Gains...

wheelrite wrote:



Yes, capital gains at a rate of 15%, not the 35+ that other income is taxed at. Sure, they paid taxes on the money they invested, why should the money earned from that investment be taxed at a lower rate. It's still income.


Which poor person employs you ?

wheelrite wrote:



Ah yes, the job creator argument. How has that been working out?
HockeyDad
14 years ago

You can't bring up 'fair' if you don't believe in the concept. Besides what would be fair for a person on a limited income above and beyond the other taxes they are responsible for? Let's say they take in 15k a year in a fixed income. What you are advocating is taking more from that person who is barely making it while not asking someone who takes in 1000% more.

FuzzNJ wrote:





I've been the one saying "fair" is a load of crap. It has no practical definition in the conversation.
FuzzNJ
14 years ago

well that's where we differ,,
I believe that the Majority of people are honest.

wheelrite wrote:



lmao. Let's all hands and sing Pollyanna.
HockeyDad
14 years ago

Yes, capital gains at a rate of 15%, not the 35+ that other income is taxed at. Sure, they paid taxes on the money they invested, why should the money earned from that investment be taxed at a lower rate. It's still income.

FuzzNJ wrote:




I think it is already a done deal that short term capital gains, long term capital gains, and dividends will soon be taxed the exact same as any other income.

I also do not think that will satisfy the bloodlust for the rich to pay their fair share.
FuzzNJ
14 years ago

The longer this lasts, the more obvious it is that OWS simply wants the governement to take care of them.

tailgater wrote:



This is true only if one ignores 95% of what the people are actually saying.
HockeyDad
14 years ago

Punishment = paying taxes.
Oh – now I see the “point”.

And that would be "godless, greedy baztard". (just helpin ya out).

It is a privilege for an American to support his country. That’s why so many serve and give their lives. It is sad that you see people doing their part as punishment.

Brewha wrote:




If punishment = paying taxes, you want increased punishment for the more successful.

God bless America, and thank you for your service. It is a shame that you see people doing their part as not being good enough.
FuzzNJ
14 years ago

Rich, upper class, middle class, lower class have no actual definition. The best you can go off is IRS and Census statistics.

Occupy Wall Street talks about the evil top 1%. Those evil doers are households making more than $380K.

HockeyDad wrote:



There is very little talk of 'evilness' of individual people, it's more of a demand for equal justice under the law and economic system. A shift from a corporate centered economy to a citizen centered one.


A lot of people who think they are middle class are easily top 20% or even top 10%.

HockeyDad wrote:



I'm glad you brought that up. People have studied that. Figure 4 from the academic piece linked below deals with the subject and it's interesting to say the least. The entire piece is full of great info.

http://sociology.ucsc.edu/whorulesamerica/power/wealth.html 
MikeyRavioli
14 years ago
At what point have I done my part plus about 4 other peoples part as well?
FuzzNJ
14 years ago

Perhaps I'll rewrite in terms you can understand.

The US fairs the successful.

HockeyDad wrote:



The US has the most millionaires, over 5,000,000 of them. We also have the most billionaires. Corporate profits have never been higher.

Yes, they are so severely punished, how will they ever survive.
FuzzNJ
14 years ago

Your preferred method of achieving equity and balance is to use punishment. You just don't want to call it that because it makes you look like a greedy baztard.

HockeyDad wrote:



aaahahahahahahaha, you can't even be serious here. Seriously, swear that you are being serious and I'll respond.
FuzzNJ
14 years ago

Lets leave the business owners and CEO's out of it for a minute.

Equity and balance or punishment?

Three guys work for the same company, all on the books, none of them is the owner.

One guy works in an entry level position in the whse and makes $26k a year. On that he is taxed about 19% and at the end of the year he gets a couple of hundred bucks refund.
The next guy is his department supervisor and makes $52k a year. On that he is taxed about 25% and at the end of the year pretty much breaks even.
The next guy is the Director that has responsibility for that dept among others and makes $110k a year. On that he is taxed about 32% and at the end of the year owes a few grand.


No matter how you view it - by total dollar amount, by percentage, - the more succesful you are the more you pay.

MikeyRavioli wrote:



And that's the definition of a progressive income tax.
HockeyDad
14 years ago

The US has the most millionaires, over 5,000,000 of them. We also have the most billionaires. Corporate profits have never been higher.

Yes, they are so severely punished, how will they ever survive.

FuzzNJ wrote:




What you meant to say is they should be punished some more.
Users browsing this topic