HockeyDad
14 years ago
Laura Bush never received this sort of awful treatment.

She killed a man a long time ago and once you kill somebody, people give you respect. Perhaps Michelle Obama just needs to kill somebody and then you will all settle down.
DrafterX
14 years ago

Laura Bush never received this sort of awful treatment.

She killed a man a long time ago and once you kill somebody, people give you respect. Perhaps Michelle Obama just needs to kill somebody and then you will all settle down.

HockeyDad wrote:





I heard she ate a kid once.... 😟
pdxstogieman
14 years ago


The affections layed on the first "lady" was the subject of the thread.
The name calling was direct assault based on opposing viewpoints.

tailgater wrote:



Your original comment is low class sludge.
DrMaddVibe
14 years ago

Your original comment is low class sludge.

pdxstogieman wrote:




The day I see you playing class monitor on the lefties here I'll break into my 1st Communion money and buy some cigars.
ZRX1200
14 years ago
Laura Bush has more street cred than Cheebacca...



Hate on that Al Sharpton.
pdxstogieman
14 years ago

The day I see you playing class monitor on the lefties here I'll break into my 1st Communion money and buy some cigars.

DrMaddVibe wrote:



Just post a few more gorilla pics.
tailgater
14 years ago

Your original comment is low class sludge.

pdxstogieman wrote:



Yup. I don't think I disputed that.

But I suppose you view my comments as worse than hers?
Or worse than the subtle cry of racism that you're too coward to confirm?

DrMaddVibe
14 years ago

Yup. I don't think I disputed that.

But I suppose you view my comments as worse than hers?
Or worse than the subtle cry of racism that you're too coward to confirm?

tailgater wrote:




for the 1st time in my CBid life I'm proud of this forum.
DrMaddVibe
14 years ago

Just post a few more gorilla pics.

pdxstogieman wrote:




looking for a mate?
pdxstogieman
14 years ago

The only difference as far as I'm concerned is that Michelle has shown time and again that she is an anti-American pig.

I have a feeling, however, that you were going for something different.
Something that perhaps you're too afraid to state clearly.
But again, I shan't put words into your mouth (or onto your keyboard, shoudl I say?).

tailgater wrote:



I'm not afraid to state what I think here. As if there's some scary retribution from message board yahoos that I'd worry about. If I was worried about that, do you think I'd be frequently posting opinions here, that are clearly unpopular with the overwhelming majority of the cbid politics forum demographic? I was curious about what was unique in the case of Obama as 1st lady that causes such virulent epithets and imagery to be invoked (not just by you btw).

Ok, so in your case you attribute it to your perception/interpretion of her public comments as anti-American. I think some of it has to do with the fact that Michelle Obama isn't simply limiting her role to championing apolitical charitable causes. She's expressing political viewpoints of her own, which understandably elicits more passionate reactions for or against, particularly in the present time where polarization and invective are more pervasive in political discussions.

Now to get to the thing you're dancing around in your reply. I do think racism is also one contributing factor in the degree of animosity and invective that is directed at Michelle Obama in general. A lot of people would like to dismiss that entirely in justifying their actions/reactions. That would require taking a leap to the conclusion that there is no longer any appreciable degree of racism present in American society. I have no idea whether that enters consciously or unconsciously into your motivations. I don't know you, so I don't presume that, but I have no hesitation to say that I think it factors into the motivations of some to one degree or another.




MikeyRavioli
14 years ago
Name calling aside - how do you justify that she lives the life and solicits donations from the very element of America that her husband rails against?
tailgater
14 years ago

I'm not afraid to state what I think here. As if there's some scary retribution from message board yahoos that I'd worry about. If I was worried about that, do you think I'd be frequently posting opinions here, that are clearly unpopular with the overwhelming majority of the cbid politics forum demographic? I was curious about what was unique in the case of Obama as 1st lady that causes such virulent epithets and imagery to be invoked (not just by you btw).

Ok, so in your case you attribute it to your perception/interpretion of her public comments as anti-American. I think some of it has to do with the fact that Michelle Obama isn't simply limiting her role to championing apolitical charitable causes. She's expressing political viewpoints of her own, which understandably elicits more passionate reactions for or against, particularly in the present time where polarization and invective are more pervasive in political discussions.

Now to get to the thing you're dancing around in your reply. I do think racism is also one contributing factor in the degree of animosity and invective that is directed at Michelle Obama in general. A lot of people would like to dismiss that entirely in justifying their actions/reactions. That would require taking a leap to the conclusion that there is no longer any appreciable degree of racism present in American society. I have no idea whether that enters consciously or unconsciously into your motivations. I don't know you, so I don't presume that, but I have no hesitation to say that I think it factors into the motivations of some to one degree or another.




pdxstogieman wrote:



What a bullsh*t reply.

You meant because she's black.

Hillary "expressed her own viewpoints" and we slammed her for 8+ years, but you seem to think our vitriol towards Michelle is somehow worse.
Because she's black.

You're the worst kind of racist.
You see racism where it doesn't exist.

Are there racists in America? Certainly.
Does racisim still exist? Absolutely.

But to use that logic to state "Therefore, all negativity towards a black lady is based on race to some degree".

That response is exponentially more "low class" than all the bad things I stated about Mrs O.
Low class, idiotic, misguided, and flat out incorrect.

I feel sorry for you.
pdxstogieman
14 years ago

Name calling aside - how do you justify that she lives the life and solicits donations from the very element of America that her husband rails against?

MikeyRavioli wrote:



I don't. President Obama is doing the same thing and his wife is acting similarly in a support role. If you look at another thread I started titled, "Obama is a Republican in sheeps clothing", you'll see that I'm highlighting the fact that Obama has solicited record campaign contributions from the same wall street influence seekers that he's busy excoriating to his voter base and he's also largely been extending Bush policies through his administration to date.

pdxstogieman
14 years ago

What a bullsh*t reply.

You meant because she's black.

Hillary "expressed her own viewpoints" and we slammed her for 8+ years, but you seem to think our vitriol towards Michelle is somehow worse.
Because she's black.

You're the worst kind of racist.
You see racism where it doesn't exist.

Are there racists in America? Certainly.
Does racisim still exist? Absolutely.

But to use that logic to state "Therefore, all negativity towards a black lady is based on race to some degree".

That response is exponentially more "low class" than all the bad things I stated about Mrs O.
Low class, idiotic, misguided, and flat out incorrect.

I feel sorry for you.

tailgater wrote:



Do you make up quotes often? "Therefore, all negativity towards a black lady is based on race to some degree".
Please go back and re-read my post. Nowhere in that post do I make that statement, although you put it in quotes and attribute it to me. That makes you a liar.

Now if you actually look at what I DID post and accurately quote it, your statement that my response is lower class than your spewing of pejoratives is laughable.
DrMaddVibe
14 years ago

I'm not afraid to state what I think here. As if there's some scary retribution from message board yahoos that I'd worry about. If I was worried about that, do you think I'd be frequently posting opinions here, that are clearly unpopular with the overwhelming majority of the cbid politics forum demographic? I was curious about what was unique in the case of Obama as 1st lady that causes such virulent epithets and imagery to be invoked (not just by you btw).

Ok, so in your case you attribute it to your perception/interpretion of her public comments as anti-American. I think some of it has to do with the fact that Michelle Obama isn't simply limiting her role to championing apolitical charitable causes. She's expressing political viewpoints of her own, which understandably elicits more passionate reactions for or against, particularly in the present time where polarization and invective are more pervasive in political discussions.

Now to get to the thing you're dancing around in your reply. I do think racism is also one contributing factor in the degree of animosity and invective that is directed at Michelle Obama in general. A lot of people would like to dismiss that entirely in justifying their actions/reactions. That would require taking a leap to the conclusion that there is no longer any appreciable degree of racism present in American society. I have no idea whether that enters consciously or unconsciously into your motivations. I don't know you, so I don't presume that, but I have no hesitation to say that I think it factors into the motivations of some to one degree or another.




pdxstogieman wrote:









RACE CARD



PLAYA!
pdxstogieman
14 years ago

RACE CARD



PLAYA!

DrMaddVibe wrote:




OH MY GOD! 48 point bold red font!!!!!! Noooo!! Not that!!!! My worst fear!
tailgater
14 years ago

Do you make up quotes often? "Therefore, all negativity towards a black lady is based on race to some degree".
Please go back and re-read my post. Nowhere in that post do I make that statement, although you put it in quotes and attribute it to me. That makes you a liar.

Now if you actually look at what I DID post and accurately quote it, your statement that my response is lower class than your spewing of pejoratives is laughable.

pdxstogieman wrote:



Make up quotes?

If I were an artist, I'd draw it so you could better understand.
The quotes were used to identify your sentiment. I now understand that you're lost, so I'll be more clear:

When you say (and I DO quote):
"I do think racism is also one contributing factor in the degree of animosity and invective that is directed at Michelle Obama in general. A lot of people would like to dismiss that entirely in justifying their actions/reactions. That would require taking a leap to the conclusion that there is no longer any appreciable degree of racism present in American society..."
It's obvious that you DO blame race (to some degree) for anything negative said towards a black person in America.

To your credit, you then add:
"I have no idea whether that enters consciously or unconsciously into your motivations. I don't know you, so I don't presume that..."

But this caveat rings untrue, since you already floated out the innuendo that somehow race was the motivating factor. The simple act of posing the question exposes this ugly viewpoint.

You then have a moment of clarity, where you finally admit your deepest little secret.
"..but I have no hesitation to say that I think it (RACE) factors into the motivations of some to one degree or another.."

But when you say "motivations of some" what you are clearly implying is those on these boards.

You can laugh all you want, but the truth is that you see race first, and all other reasons as a distant second. That makes you racially motivated.
And that makes you a racist. By the pure definition, as opposed to opinion.

I'm not saying you hate black people.
No sir.
What I'm saying is that you have so little regard for their own ability to stand up for themselves, that YOU have decided to attack all injustices (even if just perceived) FOR them.

This is why I feel sorry for you.
DrMaddVibe
14 years ago

OH MY GOD! 48 point bold red font!!!!!! Noooo!! Not that!!!! My worst fear!

pdxstogieman wrote:





OH MY GOD



A REPLY



POST




NOOOOO!!!




NOT THAT!!!!!





ANOTHER



POST




THAT



DOESN'T




MEAN CRAP




BECAUSE IT




DEFIES




COMMON




SENSE!!!!
pdxstogieman
14 years ago

Make up quotes?

If I were an artist, I'd draw it so you could better understand.
The quotes were used to identify your sentiment. I now understand that you're lost, so I'll be more clear:

When you say (and I DO quote):
"I do think racism is also one contributing factor in the degree of animosity and invective that is directed at Michelle Obama in general. A lot of people would like to dismiss that entirely in justifying their actions/reactions. That would require taking a leap to the conclusion that there is no longer any appreciable degree of racism present in American society..."
It's obvious that you DO blame race (to some degree) for anything negative said towards a black person in America.

To your credit, you then add:
"I have no idea whether that enters consciously or unconsciously into your motivations. I don't know you, so I don't presume that..."

But this caveat rings untrue, since you already floated out the innuendo that somehow race was the motivating factor. The simple act of posing the question exposes this ugly viewpoint.

You then have a moment of clarity, where you finally admit your deepest little secret.
"..but I have no hesitation to say that I think it (RACE) factors into the motivations of some to one degree or another.."

But when you say "motivations of some" what you are clearly implying is those on these boards.

You can laugh all you want, but the truth is that you see race first, and all other reasons as a distant second. That makes you racially motivated.
And that makes you a racist. By the pure definition, as opposed to opinion.

I'm not saying you hate black people.
No sir.
What I'm saying is that you have so little regard for their own ability to stand up for themselves, that YOU have decided to attack all injustices (even if just perceived) FOR them.

This is why I feel sorry for you.

tailgater wrote:



As Tye said to Judge Smails, "Don't sell yourself short. You're a really great slouch", or in this case, artist. And I'd have to say like an El Greco, your paintings are distorted.

You make the assertion, "It's obvious that you DO blame race (to some degree) for anything negative said towards a black person in America". That's not obvious or in any way something that could be construed by a reasonable person from what I actually said. What would actually be correct is that I attribute to some degree SOME of the negative things said about a black person in America to racism. For example, I think OJ Simpson is a murderer and pretty vile. I don't consider vast majority of negative statements about him to have any underlying basis in racism.

You go on to say, "But when you say "motivations of some" what you are clearly implying is those on these boards". That may be what you clearly take away as an implication of my statement, but that's not the case. I'm saying exactly what the words say. Race is a factor in the reactions of some people in society in general and to the extent this board has a spectrum the attitudes found in society general, I'd expect that some on this board make comments that are to some degree motivated by racism. Are you saying that there is no racism at play either in American society or on the cbid message boards at all? Like Lake Woebegone, the cbid message board is some kind of oasis of perfection where all the children are above average.

And then add this nugget, "But this caveat rings untrue, since you already floated out the innuendo that somehow race was the motivating factor. The simple act of posing the question exposes this ugly viewpoint". I posed the question it didn't expose anything. After you replied, I responded with my thoughts on the subject, and cited some non-racial factors that motivated strong negative emotions by some as well as race as one contributing factor in the reactions of some to one degree or another. If you consider that an "ugly viewpoint" then so be it. It's not an ugly viewpoint. It's a reality. It's not "my deepest, darkest little secret". If you don't think it comes into play at all, ever, by anybody, and that cbid is immune to it then I've got a bridge I'd like to sell you.

As to your misguided and incorrect summation:
=================
"I'm not saying you hate black people.
No sir.
What I'm saying is that you have so little regard for their own ability to stand up for themselves, that YOU have decided to attack all injustices (even if just perceived) FOR them".
===================
It would be awesome if you could actually read minds as you purport to do. So I've "decided to attack all injustices for them" because I have so little regard for black people? So in your mind responding to one thread on cbid is deciding to "attack all injustices"? By your reasoning, If someone sees an injustice that doesn't affect them, and they don't condone that injustice or they support someone or the group affected by the injustice then they're showing disregard for that person or group? So by that logic a person in Nazi germany hiding Jews from the authorities would be an anti-semite because they would be showing a disregard for their ability to stand up for themselves.

By your logic racism is a positive character building tool.
MikeyRavioli
14 years ago
Interesting ethics conversation emerging here.

If its racist for one person to make hateful comments based soley on the color of some ones skin then is it not equally racist to for a second person to feel the need to defend that person based soley on skin color?

My guess is most of the people attacking Michele Obama's duplicity would atttack her regardless of color. I am not sure that her defenders would be so quick to come to her aid if she was white.

Hillary Clinton got ragged her for years. Palin gets shredded even though she holds no office.

Its racist to bomb on Michele becuase she's black. Its not racist if you bomb on her because you hate what she stands for and she happens to be black.
Users browsing this topic