Fuzz,
Answer one simple question:

If Mitt Romney asked all white people in the same vein that Obama targeted the black community, would you consider it to be racist?

And this would include Mitt saying "I want the WHITE community to come together, etc..."

tailgater wrote:

Is the 'pure' definition different than the dictionary definition?

And certainly it discriminates, as it acknowledges a difference by targeting one group, just as any one who does the god awful job of marketing does constantly. But it's not racist. He's not attributing a stereotype or claiming superiority or inferiority, he's acknowledging a constituency.

What if a Jewish guy talks to a Jewish organization and said “motivate your flocks to come out and vote”? Racist? No, addressing a constituency.

Not being racist or a bigot doesn't mean you can't acknowledge skin color, sexual orientation, religion, national origin, rich/poor. Not acknowledging it is to think that bigotry and racism don't exist, and you have said that it does. Why is it that only when someone who is black talking to black people wrong and not other groups?

FuzzNJ wrote:

So again:
Mitt Romney going on TV and asking for WHITE churches to stump for him is OK?
Mitt Romney using the words "White Americans should vote for me" would be simply a campaign slogan?

We all know the answers.

But I want to hear them from our resident Obama supporter.
No need to cloud the issue with youtubes about the hispanic vote.

Just answer the question.

tailgater wrote:

you'd especially want the gay-homos vote huh..... 😕

DrafterX wrote:

yup.

teedubbya wrote:

Would two terms be long enough to fulfill all your gay-homo promises..... 😕

DrafterX wrote:

I re-watched Grown Ups and 50 First Dates. Love those two

Rclay wrote:

Boo hoo hoo.... it's just not fair. when did we become such cry babys. Quit the pillowbiting and fight.

If I was running of course I would want all white folk to vote for me. All black folk too. Browns etc. Any group I was in front of I would encourage to vote for me.

teedubbya wrote:

define it with your blinders all you want but I don't play that game. you have always done that.

Mitt CAN embrace whitey. The Big O can embrace whomever he wants. As for double standards, hypocracy etc. who are you mad at? you have defined a situation that hasn't happened then got upset about what would have happened. Sounds like you might be mad at yourself or your whitey friends for allowing yourselves to be persecuted.

Mitt can do it, the Big O can do it ... no one is stopping it. so yes if we can build a vacuum that perfectly matches what we desire in a discussion and then complain that anything outside that vacuum is wrong life is all smiley. but that's not reality. it just makes us feel better when artificially supporting our argument.

As for dividing the country and that other thread... meh they all do it. Always have, always will. Call a whaaaamblance.

And get over it porkchop.

teedubbya wrote:

Fuzz gets mad better than you do.
You just get pisssy. Like a broad who just got dumped.

"they all do it" blah blah blah.
That's the same reason people like you claim prison sex isn't ghey.

Coincidence?

tailgater wrote: