I am not saying you are right or that you are wrong, but:
How do you know Z was "told not to go after him"? have you read that on a certified transcript or heard an un-doctored tape recording? The most I have heard is to the effect of: "Sir, we don't need you to do that." That is NOT a clear-cut command like, for example". "Stop following him right now. Do not pursue him. Do not keep an eye on him. Go directly back home or to your vehicle the quickest way possible!".
How do you know the calls for help are from Trayvon and not Zimmerman? Because Trayvon's mom said so? Isn't her assertion, at the very least, subject to attack based on bias?
The "stand your ground" law has never really been tested. One could argue that Z was "standing his ground" if he was attacked from behind, punched in the face, knocked down and his head was being slammed against the ground, as alleged. If that is truly proven to be a fact, then wouldn't protecting one's self from fear of further injury or death reasonable?
My point here is that your "facts" have not been proven to me thus far. I just truly believe it is too soon and that we in the public have no idea what the evidence will really be. Innocent until proven guilty...
rfenst wrote: