Dayum...gotta mop the floor wif ya 2!

I caught it and started to run with it but I was afraid Victor would get beat up.... 😟

I'll check back later and see if there was another incident and Victor again saw one of those bat-signal thingies in the night clouds shaped like a ****!

Fine.....you left me hanging so now I bear sole responsibility if he straps on and gets beat up.

:-k maybe he won't strap one on..

aww who am I kiddin... 😟

So you had to bring it up again HD? "DAMMIT I made a funny! LOOK AT IT! LOOK AT IT!" 🙂 Geez, grow a pair and move on!

That's not funny. That's insulting to all homosexuals around the globe.

all 904 of them..?? 😕

8 - we don't. I'm making an assumption (I have freely admitted this) based on what I know. There is a chance that I am incorrect (I have freely admitted this as well) but am going with the most likely reason (no mugging attempt, no verbal altercation to set it off, no racial reason and Georgetown is possibly the safest place in DC, no one just gets jumped in Georgetown).

Of course, some individuals here believe that a lack of incontrovertible proof means the attack MUST have just been random. I have to assume this is because they've failed a logic test somewhere.

As for how would potential attackers know their gay? Well, despite the fact that he does like inflicting pain on people, and despite the fact that I've seen him smiling with a sideways nose and blood all over his face... my friend would be pretty easy to pick out as gay on the street. That goes double for his boyfriend.

905...Vic crossed over.

well there ya go... why didn't you say that before..... 😟

have they learned their lesson..?? 😕

Can you PLEASE just put a ballgag on Gimp and move on!

NOBODY GIVES A ****!!!!

Go play with your balls on a rugby field or in a safer neighborhood in DC...yeah...that's a real safe place!

They're moving to SAn Francisco tomorrow.

Victor,

"If I started a forum with a bunch of atheists and started in with comments such as "it's fine if they want to be christian, but I don't want to see it" or "it's wrong for them to be christian, my logic and science says so", then I would have a level of responsibility when a less than intelligent individual reads the entire forum and forms the misguided idea in their head that a large percentage of people would be happier without any christians on this world. Again, this is not a bad or a good thing, but one should be willing to accept the responsibility when it happens."

Actually, atheists don't need to have a forum. Their entire philosophy suggests that all Christians are idiots. The fact that atheists exist at all could therefore give sufficient justification to those that would want to hurt Christians. But to humor you, if you did have such a forum and someone beat up a Christian, I wouldn't blame you. I would blame the bully himself.

"The prevailing zeitgeist will always have an influence on what individuals along that spectrum think is appropriate to do. People are idiots. If sufficient people vocalize their "disagreement with it, but not sufficient enough to personally do damage" then people who want to do damage will think it will gain them favor with the other group."

People are idiots. I agree with that.

But you continue to confuse the long term effect of "hate speech" with the simple negative discussions being tossed around on these forums. The two are not synonymous and it's rather tiresome to continuously hear how simple jokes and honest opinions can drive people to hate.

When we were kids, most of us probably lived by the "sticks and stones" mentality.

Now we learn that "words can hurt" and it's taken in a literal sense.

It's all related to political correctness and it's a shame that otherwise intelligent people buy into it 110%.

When it become personal, it sucks. We all know that.

But all the more reason to teach kids and all the Idiots out there to roll with it, rather than assigning blame.

Drafter, this is the second time I've had to say I seriously hope you're joking.

Then travel to the Keys for the annual parade...

I've been posting under the assumption that the attack was related to gay bashing.

But now I'm not so sure.

You said there was no verbal altercation. I assume that means that the attackers did not call your buddy queer or other gay slurs?

That would be difficult to believe.

I mean, if you hate the person enough to beat them up because they're gay, you'd think they slip in a couple "****gs" or descriptive anal terminology during the altercation, or at the very least, they'd call them French.

TW, help us out here.

What do they call you when you're getting beaten into submission?

I'm sure you meant anal beads butt that's ky!