Sven threatened to ban ZRX once but he let him stay after a quick BJ. I'm not sure if sven went to ZRX or ZRX went to sven. as long as they were both happy.....

teedubbya wrote:

Maybe that they ALL have his number. And in that regard it's probably true. I have to be more literal around here.

MOST have his number already.

there fixed it.

teedubbya wrote:

Ya know, a couple of the guys on the team talk about some power bottom they like to visit occasionally they call "Drafty"... so, ya know... Drafter has really gotten around.

victor809 wrote:

What a kiss and tell queer!

DrMaddVibe wrote:

I won't talk about SvenR, I'm a gentleman.

ZRX1200 wrote:

Actually Trish PMd me a ban threat once.

And I won't talk about SvenR, I'm a gentleman.

ZRX1200 wrote:

Ahhh that's why it was a one time thing. Sven likes it rough.

teedubbya wrote:

Ya know, a couple of the guys on the team talk about some power bottom they like to visit occasionally they call "Drafty"... so, ya know... Drafter has really gotten around.

victor809 wrote:

................

What's the point of this post? There are a lot of idiots out there in this world, probably more than any of you could imagine. And every time I see or hear someone make one of those bullsh$t statements like "I don't agree with X, but if they do it behind closed doors" I think to myself that there is some idiot out there who (correctly) interprets that statement to be "I'm not going to personally do something about it, but I wish those people didn't exist" and decides to take it upon themselves to try to fix that for you.

victor809 wrote:

You're in DC? You ever smoke at Shelly's?

victor809 wrote:

^ Your "correction" means you know yourself that #2 is an incorrect statement. Not only that, it's a vague statement. What do you want kept behind closed doors? You don't want to see two guys screwing? Fine, 98.2% of the population looks disgusting having sex and no one wants to see it. Gay or straight, fat/ugly people shouldn't be screwing in public. But if you broaden that to include things which a straight couple does in public, then you're marginalizing a group.

victor809 wrote:

Somewhere right now a gay rugby player just got beaten up because of Tailgater's post.

HockeyDad wrote:

Somewhere right now a gay rugby player just got beaten up because of Tailgater's post.

HockeyDad wrote:

This is where you lose credibility.

I corrected my statement to broaden the scope, since we can't always determine intent when reading a post.

For instance:

Two guys type the same post: "I don't care what they do behind closed doors"

The first guy actually means: I understand that some people are gay and I can accept that fact. I just wish they'd stop pushing their agenda in our face every chance they get.

the second guy actually means: Keep that crap behind the door of the closet that just came out of.

Now, as someone who subscribes to the first gentleman's train of thought, I can honestly say that all the disparaging posts that I've read over the past two days appear (to me) to be all in fun, or otherwise well intended and therefore benign.

tailgater wrote: