Not enough for gheys to not shop there......gotta go all gorilla warfare online. How classy.

I like the "you're going to have to make something up line"......

ZRX1200 wrote:

Gay-homo militant extremists make the regular gay-homos look bad. Kinda like Al Qaeda to Muslims.

HockeyDad wrote:

Your statement is shameful and disgusting in it's inability to understand base logical concepts. You are a shame to every human who has come before you in attempts to elevate our ability to reason and explain the workings of the universe.

victor809 wrote:

You know my thoughts on this subject, but I think you underestimate how easily some people can be persuaded.
Think about cults.
What about street gangs? Sure there's a safety factor, but too many of these punks end up enjoying the violence.
Girls form pregnancy pacts because of peer pressure and outside influence.
People stick needles into their veins because someone else told them it was fun and it was OK. I'm not talking about an addict. Think about that First Time.
College Frats subject pledges to a host of embarrassing moments. None that would be deemed wonderful. and they willingly accept this.

I'm not purposely comparing being gay with the list of things above. I'm just saying that outside influences do have an impact where a "reasonable and sane" person would seemingly otherwise object.

Not trying to add more grey area. Just letting you understand that your conclusions may not be the only logical one, even though I mostly agree with you on this subject.

I think it's a false argument anyhow.
Does it matter if it's a choice or genetic?
The end result (no pun intended) is the same.

tailgater wrote:

A simple "Outrage" would have sufficed.

HockeyDad wrote:

I haven't come to a conclusion..?? 😕

oh that's right.. it wasn't yours.. 🤦

DrafterX wrote:

Then allow me to rephrase:
"Your ability to come to intelligent conclusions"

You seem to do a great job at coming to stupid ones.

victor809 wrote:

If ghey is not a choice and is genetic and gays don't reproduce, why hasn't Darwinism taken the ghey gene out of existence?

We need a "Freddie Mercury For The Cure" charity.

It may not be Pfizer or Merck....maybe the cure will come from Europe from Sanofi Aventis or Bayer.....maybe even Teva in Israel. Imagine if Teva isolated the ghey gene.....they could weaponize it and spread it throughout the Arab world water supply meanwhile vaccinating all of Israel against it, and sell the vaccine to Europe and the USA.

I got get into Big Pharma!

HockeyDad wrote:

So you didn't read the article, did you. We went over this twice already, I gave you a link. Hell, if you can't read and understand a 2 paragraph abstract I'm afraid big oil perhaps has overpayed for your services....

victor809 wrote:

So you didn't read the article, did you. We went over this twice already, I gave you a link. Hell, if you can't read and understand a 2 paragraph abstract I'm afraid big oil perhaps has overpayed for your services....

victor809 wrote:

french = gay

le hockedads current position on gays is a false flag (false f a g?) operation

teedubbya wrote:

That would lend credence to the ghey being a choice! Hello sailor!

HockeyDad wrote:

DrMaddVibe wrote:

you'd think that would still be a reason not to go gay-homo.... 😟

DrafterX wrote:

I read the article. It SUGGESTS....You read FACT.

You bought into the theory because it fits your needs. I say if you're right, we will work on the cure.

HockeyDad wrote:

](*,)

FACTS are data points (ie, correlating data within a study). These facts allow someone to create a hypothesis, which answers your question. It may be proven wrong later (or it may be proven right), but it sure as hell does a better job of answering your question than something not based on any facts.

At this time there is no data pointing in a different direction.

And I have no problem with someone trying to work on a "cure". Who cares. Develop anything and let people decide what to use. What does it matter to me?

victor809 wrote: