i am amazed at how much misinformation is out there in regards to this case and how many incorrect "facts" are floating around.
Most people i talk to:
insist Z followed T, from the 911 call it doesnt appear to be the case, he continued talking to the dispatcher for quite awhile
they dont know about the polygraph/voice stress test he took
dont know about the dope in Ts system or that the candy and tea he bought are generally used to make an iillegal drink called "lean" (tea, skittles and cough syrup)
dont know about T bragging on twitter about punching a school bus driver
dont know about Ts three school suspensions (graffiti, stolen jewelry and drug baggies)
say that Z was a wanna be cop when he actually exposed sanford PD for slothfulness, racial bias etc after going on several ride alongs
that Z mentored black students through a program and continued to do so at his own expense
that Z was recognized by black community for helping bring to light the beating of a black homeless man by a sanford pd's son
i believe Zs biggest mistake since the shooting was lying about the funds. that really makes him look bad. we'll never know what actually happened that night. I would find it hard to believe that someone with that history hates blacks and actually wanted to kill a kid.
whether it was T or Z who first mouthed off to the other, i still think it could have been defused at that point by either party. If T said hey **** why are you following me, Z could have identified himself and mentioned the recent crime spat to which T could have explained why he was there and respectively, if Z yelled at T first, T could have identified himself/where he was staying/why. No one wins at the end of the day. I know a lot of friendships have been destroyed by people taking concrete sides on this even though none of us will ever truly know for sure.
Papachristou wrote: