My vote for RP will not make one bit of a differance. Lier in Cheif will be re-elected by a landslide.

dpnewell wrote:

As far as the millions of multigenerational Welfare types go, their vote is already in the bag for Barry O...or anybody else that promises to continue redistributing wealth from the makers to the takers.

But I find it hard to believe there remain enough koolaid drinkers out there to elect a slick-talking marginally documented unqualified empty suit of a socialist for the second time.

DadZilla3 wrote:

Why do you hate iPhones?

Brewha wrote:

I thinkin’ it too little too late.

But – come the first of November when all of the debates are done, when Mit discloses his secret and details plans for the counties future, and the American voter is at last stirred by his vision and rushes to the polls en masse to dethrone Obama for his utter failure . . .
Wait – now I’m really being silly.

Brewha wrote:

So you DID listen to obama during the debate.

Tell me this: when has a candidate EVER provided specific details?
Hell, Obama and Pelosi forced the healthcare bill through Congress before ANYONE had an opportunity to read it. Not even the contributing authors knew the entire scope.
Same for the TRILLION $ stimulus...

Obama had his opportunity. He failed miserably.
Mitt may be a savior, or more likely he'll just be more of the same. But he deserves a chance simply because he is NOT Obama and he understands economics.

tailgater wrote:

So you DID listen to obama during the debate.

Tell me this: when has a candidate EVER provided specific details?
Hell, Obama and Pelosi forced the healthcare bill through Congress before ANYONE had an opportunity to read it. Not even the contributing authors knew the entire scope.
Same for the TRILLION $ stimulus.

The first two years with the filibuster proof congress created the largest debt-to-our-children that the country has ever witnessed.
And we're discussing whether or not Romney detailed the specific programs he'd cut to help right the ship??

You're not being silly.
You're ignoring the magnitude of the situation.

Obama had his opportunity. He failed miserably.
Mitt may be a savior, or more likely he'll just be more of the same. But he deserves a chance simply because he is NOT Obama and he understands economics.

tailgater wrote:

=d>
Freaking AWESOME post.
I would much rather give Mittens a chance to screw up than give Owedumba another crack with his "great ideas"! To date he's been an abject failure.
We can vote him out if he fails like we're going to do with the Kenyan King.

DrMaddVibe wrote:

ANOTHER good post!!=d> =d> =d>

bloody spaniard wrote:

Mitt may be a savior,

tailgater wrote:

Huh....
and everyone says obama thinks he's a messiah?

victor809 wrote:

So you DID listen to obama during the debate.

Tell me this: when has a candidate EVER provided specific details?
Hell, Obama and Pelosi forced the healthcare bill through Congress before ANYONE had an opportunity to read it. Not even the contributing authors knew the entire scope.
Same for the TRILLION $ stimulus.

The first two years with the filibuster proof congress created the largest debt-to-our-children that the country has ever witnessed.
And we're discussing whether or not Romney detailed the specific programs he'd cut to help right the ship??

You're not being silly.
You're ignoring the magnitude of the situation.

Obama had his opportunity. He failed miserably.
Mitt may be a savior, or more likely he'll just be more of the same. But he deserves a chance simply because he is NOT Obama and he understands economics.

tailgater wrote:

Obviously because they're black, and they rarely work when you need them to...

tailgater wrote:

And, if you put two of them together you'll have a couple of dozen in a few years. But none of those will work very well either.

DadZilla3 wrote:

^^^^^
attn: [email protected]

tailgater wrote:

Vic,
Nice of you to take something out of context. Bravo.

tailgater wrote:

Just giving you a bit of sheet

victor809 wrote: