Just heard that yesterday he openly announced that although he opposes abortion, he will not endorse any legislation which changes current law or Roe v. Wade.

rfenst wrote:

30 days in da hole... :-"

DrafterX wrote:

I believe this has been his stance all along.

Of course, if you look at the wording he could still appoint a SC justice to do the dirty work for him and he'd still be true to his word.

Either way, the abortion issue is fuqin stoopid. Anyone who votes for a president on this one issue is ignorant.

tailgater wrote:

Would you vote for a pro-choice or pro-abortion candidate?

rfenst wrote:

Would you?

DrMaddVibe wrote:

he is morphing all over the place. he may even change his stance to WIDE if it would get him a vote. I haven't seen this many flip flops since visiting the nude beach in ding dang

teedubbya wrote:

Frontline ? Really ? Hard to not notice which way they lean.

dubleuhb wrote:

Frontline ? Really ? Hard to not notice which way they lean.

dubleuhb wrote:

Would you vote for a pro-choice or pro-abortion candidate?

rfenst wrote:

I don't even consider this issue when voting.
If all other issues between candidates were exactly equal, I'd vote based on how hot their wife is before I would care about their stance on abortion.

Now, if we're talking about using public money for abortion, or preventing a clinic from performing procedures on underage girls without parental consent, etc., then I would care about the issue.
But to put this in the same category as the economy and taxes and foreign policy, etc is idiotic and the time spent discussing it while our country sinks is unforgivable.

The procedure is heinous. We treat stray dogs better than unborn children.
But there is no way in hell that this "choice" could ever be taken away without jeopardizing the safety of young women.

tailgater wrote:

How do I get clearance from you about the issues I factored into my decision who to vote for?

rfenst wrote: