500 billion USD in tax increases are coming on January 1 2013 but it is not an election topic. The Congressional Budget Office already has stated that it will put the US economy into a recession.

HockeyDad wrote:

I admire how the two options seem to take a complex and difficult problem, fraught with detailed choices, and reduce it to a simple go left or go right decision. For a moment they almost looked like real choices. But life is so much better with simple, simple choices, and the bliss of ignoring details – is it not?

I’m imagining how you assess the complexity of cigars . . . .

Brewha wrote:

Yes I do. In fact when I smoke is one of the few times that I am not spewing my liberal crap.

:-$

Brewha wrote:

where's the 'ignore and maybe it'll go away' option..?? 😕

DrafterX wrote:

I admire how the two options seem to take a complex and difficult problem, fraught with detailed choices, and reduce it to a simple go left or go right decision. For a moment they almost looked like real choices. But life is so much better with simple, simple choices, and the bliss of ignoring details – is it not?

I’m imagining how you assess the complexity of cigars . . . .

Brewha wrote:

I admire how the two options seem to take a complex and difficult problem, fraught with detailed choices, and reduce it to a simple go left or go right decision. For a moment they almost looked like real choices. But life is so much better with simple, simple choices, and the bliss of ignoring details – is it not?

I’m imagining how you assess the complexity of cigars . . . .

Brewha wrote:

So faced with inheriting reckless Bush economic policies, Clinton chose which one of these approaches?

Brewha wrote: