DrafterX
13 years ago
Was the lie about the money..?? I may have had a hard time answering that question... was the money actually in his checking account or was it being held by someone or something else for lawyer and court costs..?? Would he have been able to get this money and run if he chose..?? If it were me and I didn't have access to it I may not have answered correctly... How was the question asked..?? 🤔
rfenst
  • rfenst
  • Herf-A-Holic Topic Starter
13 years ago

Was the lie about the money..?? I may have had a hard time answering that question... was the money actually in his checking account or was it being held by someone or something else for lawyer and court costs..?? Would he have been able to get this money and run if he chose..?? If it were me and I didn't have access to it I may not have answered correctly... How was the question asked..?? 🤔

DrafterX wrote:




Would have to read the transcript from the hearing. But, I assure you it doesn't look good. He and his wife's phone conversations were recorded while he was in jail and they were using "code" in reference to the money and amounts as well as who it would be distributed to for safekeeping. Never told his lawyer, which would have been the smartest thing to do. lawyer would have put it in a Trust Account. Only the lawyer would have been able to access it. I am sure that you can find the questions and answers from the hearing and perhaps even video of the hearing if you search the Internet.
DrafterX
13 years ago
doesn't sound good then... I figured people would send to fund instead of him directly... I'll look aound....
rfenst
  • rfenst
  • Herf-A-Holic Topic Starter
13 years ago

doesn't sound good then... I figured people would send to fund instead of him directly... I'll look aound....

DrafterX wrote:



He started his own site to proclaim his innocence and then begs/asks for legal defense contributions. I think the donations were predominantly sent by Pay-Pal. His own attorney was kept out of the loop and, once the attorney found out he had to disclose it to the court. That, him telling his wife to keep all disbursal for safekeeping under $10k; the "secretive" code language of their conversations and the like do not fare well for the charges being dismissed pretrial by a judge.
HockeyDad
13 years ago

He started his own site to proclaim his innocence and then begs/asks for legal defense contributions. I think the donations were predominantly sent by Pay-Pal. His own attorney was kept out of the loop and, once the attorney found out he had to disclose it to the court. That, him telling his wife to keep all disbursal for safekeeping under $10k; the "secretive" code language of their conversations and the like do not fare well for the charges being dismissed pretrial by a judge.

rfenst wrote:




He sounds like a murderer. Good thing they already have the gallows built for him.
rfenst
  • rfenst
  • Herf-A-Holic Topic Starter
13 years ago

He sounds like a murderer. Good thing they already have the gallows built for him.

HockeyDad wrote:



Wrong inference to draw, from what wrote as to whether he should be presently tried or have his case kicked at a "stand your ground hearing". However, I do believe he and/or his wife is/are guilty of lying; a lie of omission; and/or deceiving the court about the money; and that this seriously affects his or her credibility. On the other hand what's a mere $100-300k amongst friends?

rfenst
  • rfenst
  • Herf-A-Holic Topic Starter
13 years ago

He sounds like a murderer. Good thing they already have the gallows built for him.

HockeyDad wrote:



Wrong inference to draw here.

IMO, he just seems to me to have been dishonest/a liar at his initial bond hearing by way of either a direct lie or a lie of omission. This seriously affects his credibility. On the other hand what's just a mere $100-300k amongst friends and family?

HockeyDad
13 years ago

IMO, he just seems to me to have been dishonest/a liar at his initial bond hearing by way of either a direct lie or a lie of omission. This seriously affects his credibility. On the other hand what's just a mere $100-300k amongst friends and family?

rfenst wrote:



Maybe it is just that latinos aren't used to all of a sudden having that kind of money and he panicked.
rfenst
  • rfenst
  • Herf-A-Holic Topic Starter
13 years ago

Maybe it is just that latinos aren't used to all of a sudden having that kind of money and he panicked.

HockeyDad wrote:



Well, you certainly should be able to provoke someone now!
DrMaddVibe
13 years ago

Maybe it is just that latinos aren't used to all of a sudden having that kind of money and he panicked.

HockeyDad wrote:





I think it's because he's really a White Hispanic. You KNOW how THEY are![whip]
HockeyDad
13 years ago

I think it's because he's really a White Hispanic. You KNOW how THEY are![whip]

DrMaddVibe wrote:




You would think the "white" part would be able to handle money.
DrMaddVibe
13 years ago

You would think the "white" part would be able to handle money.

HockeyDad wrote:




Yeah, Lindsey Lohan is a real saver!
biggcarl
13 years ago
When Z spotted M did he draw his gun? No.

When Z was exchangeing words with M did he draw his gun? No.

When Z was punched in the nose by M did he draw his gun? No.

When Z was having the back of skull bounced off the sidewalk did he draw his gun? Yes.

So not until he was in mortal danger did draw. I'll be honest, if I have a gun and someone is slamming my head off the sidewalk, you can damn well bet I'll empty the magazine into whoever it is. He waited until he was clearly in danger of lossing his life to use deadly force. Clear cut case of self defense.

Now they want to bring him up on charges of lieing about money. Here's a thought, if they never filed this BS case, there would not any defense fund money to lie about.
DrafterX
13 years ago
So, why was the Zimmer dude there in the first place... I heard he didn't live or work there.... 😟
HockeyDad
13 years ago

So, why was the Zimmer dude there in the first place... I heard he didn't live or work there.... 😟

DrafterX wrote:



The prosecution's theory is he was hunting black people.
Papachristou
13 years ago

Because he lied at his bail hearing. Beacuse the prosecution is dragging its feet and because these things take more time than you can fathom.

rfenst wrote:



yeah, lying about that money was a bad bad move. i mean come on, they can find out what you searched on google a year ago, you dont think someone is going to notice $100k+ in your paypal account lol?
rfenst
  • rfenst
  • Herf-A-Holic Topic Starter
13 years ago

By Rene Stutzman, Orlando Sentinel
7:44 p.m. EST, December 14, 2012



SANFORD — In three weeks, Circuit Judge Debra S. Nelson, who's overseeing the George Zimmerman murder case, will inherit a new one: George Zimmerman's defamation suit against NBC Universal Media LLC.

Rarely is a judge asked to preside over a man's murder case and, at the same time, his suit demanding a big payout from a major media company that he accuses of defamation.

Mark O'Mara represents Zimmerman in both cases. In an email exchange Thursday, he wrote that he sees no conflict with Nelson handling both cases and has no current plans to ask her to give the defamation suit to another judge.

Nelson, 59, is taking over the NBC case because she's swapping jobs with another Sanford judge, Marlene Alva, a 13-year court veteran. In January, Nelson will hear civil cases, those involving disputes over money and property — not crimes.

She'll hang onto the Zimmerman second-degree murder case, which she has set for trial in June, but will hand off her other pending criminal cases, including the perjury case against Zimmerman's wife, Shellie Zimmerman.

It will now be handled by Alva, 60.

George Zimmerman is the 29-year-old Neighborhood Watch volunteer charged with second-degree murder in the shooting Trayvon Martin, an unarmed black 17-year-old, in Sanford Feb. 26.

He filed suit against NBC and three of its reporters last week, accusing them of editing a recording of his call to police that night in a way that suggests he's a racist. His suit also alleges that NBC falsely reported that he used a racial epithet during the call.

Two of the three named reporters were fired months ago, and NBC News President Steve Capus apologized, saying the edited audio was a mistake — not a deliberate act.

The media company issued a statement after the suit was filed, saying it did not intend to unfairly portray Zimmerman and will defend itself in court
nicholasjames
13 years ago
NBC News President Steve Capus apologized, saying the edited audio was a mistake ...

mistake his ass.
ZRX1200
13 years ago
Named reporters?

Isn't the news editor responsible for what hits the air?


Typical for today in Amerika.
nicholasjames
13 years ago

Named reporters?

Isn't the news editor responsible for what hits the air?


Typical for today in Amerika.

ZRX1200 wrote:



responsible? not today. not any more. "amerika" it is.
Users browsing this topic