^^Come on Dave, you know that one of the libs top tactics is "deflection".

Nothing personal Brew. I wouldn't expect any less of you.

dpnewell wrote:

I do not bash people for their appearances. Every person is beautiful in the eyes of our higher power.

And I have no disillusionment. The fact is that the ineptness of the current administration is demonstrated by the failed policies, false and broken promises, and total disregard for the Constitution of the United States of America.

surfish1961 wrote:

That's the reason why I used 'higher power' in post #8 instead of the 'G' word. I knew if I threw God into the conversation, brewha would have gotten all flustered and resort to name calling.

surfish1961 wrote:

Fair enough. My comment about the First Lady was unwarranted in your case.

However, making the statement "I have no disillusionment" smackes of a whole lotta disillusionment. We all have our illusions and fallacies - all of us. You seem particularly afflicted.

If you have some special clarity of thought, we are waiting for it.

Brewha wrote:

Oh, man up and tempt me. Talking about God is not for everyone. But I'm game . . . .

Brewha wrote:

I'm venturing a guess that that's the best apology I'm going to get from you about the First Lady comment. Apology accepted. It would have been a lot easier to say "I'm sorry".

And don't just re-post snippets of a previous post.

It should read:

And I have no disillusionment. The fact is that the ineptness of the current administration is demonstrated by the failed policies, false and broken promises, and total disregard for the Constitution of the United States of America.

That is the perception of millions of people in this Country. I guess they, as well as myself, are all particularly afflicted.

surfish1961 wrote:

That is my right and my privilege to talk about God. I'm game too. What would you like to talk about?

surfish1961 wrote:

Ok, but what about the perception of the people that don’t watch Fox News? Because to most of us, you seem pretty disillusioned - and bitterly so.

Brewha wrote:

Would you agree that if God did not exist (that’s IF he did not exist) it would be necessary to create him?

Brewha wrote:

And I really didn't know that my appeal was subject to your approval.

Oh but that's right. Being a liberal, you are an intellectual. I forgot. My bad.

surfish1961 wrote:

If?


You're going to bring IF to the party? That's the big knot in your g-string? IF? That's what the whole discussion is going to hinge on now? C'mon.


YOU CAN'T BRING THAT WEAKASS STUFF UP IN THIS HUMPTY BUMPTY!

DrMaddVibe wrote:

This is the problem, Brew. You can't have a discussion with people who refuse to deny that there are valid viewpoints other than their own. Only a godless, communist, Islamo-fascist, militant homosexual, man-hating feminazi would suggest otherwise.

tegulator wrote:

What’s wrong with “if”? Too many letters?

Brewha wrote:

Would you agree that if Jell-O did not exist (that’s IF it did not exist) it would be necessary to create it?

Brewha wrote:

Would you agree that if my brain did not exist (that’s IF it did not exist) it would be necessary to create it?

Brewha wrote:

Would you agree that if rubby did not exist (that’s IF it did not exist) it would be necessary to create it?

Brewha wrote:

Ok, but what about the perception of the people that don’t watch Fox News? Because to most of us, you seem pretty disillusioned - and bitterly so.

Brewha wrote:

Would you agree that if God did not exist (that’s IF he did not exist) it would be necessary to create him?

Brewha wrote:

Well now you know.
I accept your apology.


Wait – you’re calling me a intellectual liberal?
Well, I guess it not “name calling” if it’s accurate, right?

Brewha wrote:

Again, Brew, there's no sense talking. We bring up hypothetical situations or questions and they're shot down for not being "real," we use valid and sound logic and we're called names because our claims conflict with people's biases which are somehow universal in terms of generality and correctness.

Oh, and MaddVibe...it's spelled "tiara." Apparently proper spelling means that one is an "intellectual liberal."

tegulator wrote: