Interesting statement. So, as long as an act is considered legal by the laws of the land, or sanctioned by the ruling government, you would consider it divisive and insulting to those committing such legal acts, if anyone else should condemn or judge such acts, based on their own set of values? You know where I'm going with this, so I'll save us both some time. Are you really sure you want to stand by your statement?
dpnewell wrote: