Some simple questions, as I'm a simple man. Disclaimer.... These questions are meant to be provocative.
The Syrians bombed the Syrians, so, we are contemplating shooting missiles at the Syrians, as retaliation?
This is an ongoing civil war where 100,000 people have already died, isn't it?
Isn't this actually a conflict between the Sunni and Shia?
This threatens our National Security how?
Shouldn't any outside response come from the U.N. instead of the U.S.A. acting unilaterally?
We want the same body of government to decide if we act or not, that cannot pass a budget successfully?
Isn't it a questionable play for the President to now throw the decision at congress, so that they can be blamed in the end?
Have we not learned anything from our past mistakes in the region?
A few days ago, the President was ready to act unilaterally without an act of congress, to strike the Syrian govt. over WMD, wasn't he?
Sound familiar?
What changed?
stogiemonger wrote:
