I either can't believe what I'm reading, or I simply don't understand you.

What are you talking about?

If it's the abortion, then it's 100% the woman.
If it's the pregnancy, then it's 50% the guy and 50% the gal, assuming it's consensual.

Your math is flawed.

tailgater wrote:

Right.


No woman EVER IN THE HISTORY OF PROPHYLACTIC S LIED OR MANIPULATED A PROPHYLACTIC to get pregnant.


Biggest moron here in awhile. Quite impressive.

ZRX1200 wrote:

Right.


No woman EVER IN THE HISTORY OF PROPHYLACTIC S LIED OR MANIPULATED A PROPHYLACTIC to get pregnant.


Biggest moron here in awhile. Quite impressive.

ZRX1200 wrote:

"pulling out" is not what you should teach if you are teaching about how to have sex without resulting in pregnancy. I remember Catholic friends talking about "rhythm" method decades ago, also stupid. Some had kids they loved, but never planned.

My wife and I went out for 8 years (16 yo to 24 yo) before getting married, and were married for close to 4 years before she became pregnant. 12 years of non-pregnancy sex. Why? We were not ready to have a baby. How? By having safe sex, and by my respect for her, not at all difficult.

We had our first when we really wanted her and when we were really ready.

And she just had her (planned) first baby a month ago at the age of 32, after going with the guy for 3 years and married for 3 more.

Many here will attest that I am a idiot (I did that on purpose), yet even I was able to avoid the need to consider abortion...something I could never live with and even at that age knew it could be avoided.

But this nonsense about secretions and pulling out...the secretions alone are enough.

frankj1 wrote:

I cannot understand your lack logic or the inability to see the equation from the other side.

A man is 100% in control whether a woman gets pregnant or not, he is in exclusive charge of whether he pulls out or not. Is that inaccurate? Can a woman force herself to get pregnant if the man doesnt want it? NO
A woman cannot control a mans secretions, a man can.

Now, the ONLY time a woman has an unwanted pregnancy is when a man was unable to control his secretion.

Lets put that in a formula, and see if you can prove it wrong: Woman cannot get pregnant without man's consent. Man can get woman pregnant without her consent.

No you are dead wrong that "If it's the abortion, then it's 100% the woman" A man can drag a woman to an abortion clinic, beat miscarriage or give her the morning after pill. MOREOVER, the only reason she is having an abortion is because the pregnancy was a result of him impregnating someone that did not want to be impregnated.

scompay wrote:

Here is some real food for thought.

How many abortions would we see, if we could make contraceptives for men in a pill form, but a pill that worked just minutes before having sex. Even better if it was combined with viagra.

scompay wrote:

Or we could just make anal sex the go-to choice.
I call this idea "thinking outside the BOX"...

tailgater wrote:

The abortion problem is a male problem, and the best proof can be found right here..

The picture post section is full of pictures of kids you wanna fck. These kids would make horrible mothers. See men wanna fck, not have children, at least according to this board. Go find a womans blog, you will see the opposite, they are looking for fathers, not fcking kids.

There is the conundrum, men want sex, without children, women want children. Now we see where abortion fits in.

scompay wrote:

are you a woman..?? 😕

DrafterX wrote: