oh my,,,

wheel,

wheelrite wrote:

Btw, Victor, what's involved in setting up a new alias?

I vaguely remembered trying to register a Ruggerio Ruccici or Button Ballsack or somesuch a while back under the new format & it didn't "work".

I guess I didn't give enough of a shiite to figure it out.

bloody spaniard wrote:

Give it up, Wheel. These Philistines do not appreciate the highbrow stuff.

JadeRose wrote:

😕 another vague movie reference for a scene/dialogue that has to be googled??

thread killing bastid

bloody spaniard wrote:

I guess that you think this thread shouldn't be killed. It was from a book not a movie. 😣

Buckwheat wrote:

Spaniard,

You said it, and its the only sense you have made today; people were more genuine when they were in character!

I really enjoyed this site back then. The funniest was 3 characters (all the same person) debating with each other.

Bloody, i though all of them were you. You gave up Normous Falani cause it was too obviously you.

scompay wrote:

Now I get it.

Howard Stern=highbrow comedy.

gryphonms wrote:

buncha roll-playing phags.

tailgater wrote:

Bear with us, we are not hijacking your thread, but getting to the bottom of something. Normous Fulani would never believe he was this important.

When we let people be themselves, they teeter between boring and offensive. When we put them in a scooby doo costume, they act the part.

Therefore; Cbid should allow aliases, in a controlled form, They should create 6 characters and let people play them. Like rodeo clowns that keep things lively and audiences smiling.

scompay wrote:

Ok...

I see where you're going with this. Now, let's take it one step further.

Perhaps Cbid should require everyone create a second username and require they post 50% of the time under that.

You know, just to keep things interesting.

victor809 wrote:

Yeah who are we kidding. Folks are never going to be authentic on the web, may as well make the most of it and ask them to be someone completely different.

scompay wrote: