You are a acting like a french bull****er unless you can back your claim. (mind you if you are going to act french- you probably dont want to back anything)

Show me where/how Patton never said that about the French. Thats all you have to do.

scompay wrote:

Like I said, your apology is accepted.




http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/George_S._Patton 


"I'd rather have a German division in front of me, than a French one behind."

Misattributed by former Defense Secretary James Schlesinger on Fox News. Patton commanded French troops, the 2nd Armored Division commanded by Philippe Leclerc, integrated in the Third Army, and had rocky but friendly relations with the French general. For instance, on August, 15 1944 Patton wrote in his diary: "Leclerc came in very much excited. He said, among other things, that if he were not allowed to advance on Paris, he would resign. I told him in my best French that he was a baby and said I had left him in the most dangerous place on the front. We parted friends"

HockeyDad wrote:

I swear...he's wrong twice. It is clear he doesn't know what he's talking about so I walk away and now he's still chimp screaming.

HockeyDad wrote:

BULL****! Thats not a valid source- anyone can write anything there.

Besides in been in print for longer than Fox News has been around.

Its the joke of the world that they are cheese eating surrender monkeys. This is not out of character.

scompay wrote:

Are you saying that I am wrong about England attacking and destroying a French naval fleet??

Which I am sure is subject you had no clue about till my post. Be honest.

scompay wrote:

Yes. One ship was sunk.

Your apology is accepted.

HockeyDad wrote:

That fleet was destroyed!! prove it otherwise.

You are desperate hairsplitting.

The essence of my point still remains and irrefutable . The French could not be trusted to have a navy.

scompay wrote:

On a side note. No one knows how many men it takes to defend Paris. Its never been attempted.

scompay wrote:

That fleet was destroyed!! prove it otherwise.

You are desperate hairsplitting.

The essence of my point still remains and irrefutable . The French could not be trusted to have a navy.

scompay wrote:

On a side note. No one knows how many men it takes to defend Paris. Its never been attempted.

scompay wrote:

One thing is clear to me now. The French accept apologys graciously. But are delusional about when apologies are offered.

gryphonms wrote:

Once again with the "prove it". You look it up this time.

In the meantime, your apology is still accepted.

HockeyDad wrote: