well, we could always implement the 2 kill rule... 😟

Don't commit the crime unless you're willing to serve the time… or punishment as it be.

Do these criminals consider their victims cruel and unusual punishment? How can they expect better treatment than what they imposed on their victims?

Uncle RICK, the way you say that is arousing.

I just read THiS, come on now....do YOU really believe this? So he chooses to let a small child die at the hands of some Fuckhead who has zero respect for life?? He chose to let the planes hit the towers? While I do believe in creation and A GOD, I DO NOT for one minute think HE / SHE decides who dies and on what day.......

And, if what you say IS true, if it was Gods will to decide who lives and who dies.....what's to say then that HE did NOT direct those folks @ the prison to kill this man in that way? 🌫

Death penalty debate aside, I believe it can be argued, that it is cruel and unusual punishment to impose a slow death, such as in the case of the botched lethal injection.

There are far more efficient, time tested, and proven methods of a quick and humane execution, that have been used by governments over time. It seems that we, as a nation, have become oversensitive to the methods of execution used, if they are ugly. It seems we are more comfortable with a "nice easy death".

The aforementioned execution methods (firing squad, guillotine, hanging) would likely stand any 8th amendment challenges. Botched slow lethal injections may not fare out so well against any 8th amendment challenges.

Only when the criminal element takes " humane treatment " for their victims into account....should we then consider them!!! I like the one bullet to the back of the head with billing for said bullet to the estate of the killer.