Poll Question: Is Global Warming Real?
teedubbya
12 years ago
I hope that didn't have anythng to do with the fireman spittin or you are in for an audit (as soon as cros finds bloody)
ZRX1200
12 years ago
I heard CROS got in Bloody's van......😟
TrishS@CigarBid
12 years ago
Is this the new 500?
teedubbya
12 years ago
yes. we didn't want bloody to know about it but now that you know so will he.
gryphonms
12 years ago
Darn, it's no longer the hidden 500.
frankj1
12 years ago

We've had a steady rain here all day long. There's so much CO2 in the air, people are gonna start dropping dead from asphyxiation.

BuckyB93 wrote:


my lawn looks great.
DrafterX
12 years ago
Acording to the NPRs that's why everybody has weeds in their lawns this year.... I remember battling weeds the first couple months of spring for years but now apparently it's an epidemic... 🤔
wheelrite
12 years ago

yes. we didn't want bloody to know about it but now that you know so will he.

teedubbya wrote:



he's a Basque phag...

who cares,,,


wheel,,,
tailgater
12 years ago

TG, the water vapor is relavent, my point is that article states carbon dioxide increases water vapor.

gryphonms wrote:



Read it again.
The water vapor is the primary culprit, even though the two have a mutual impact.
Your facts are correct, but your conclusion is backwards.

The closing quote from that article:
"Water vapor is the big player in the atmosphere as far as climate is concerned."


ZRX1200
12 years ago
I'm trying to get outraged.......

Just


Can't

Do

It.
gryphonms
12 years ago
TG, now I think I understand your point so I will try to better state my point.

After reading HD's point about water vapor I read an article from NASA that explained that atmospheric water vapor is a cause of global warming. It also stated that increasing atmospheric carbon dioxide increases atmospheric water vapor. Global warming is far to complex of an issue to state that it is man made. But I find it reasonable to say part of global warming could be man made. Also due to the complexity of global warming it is unrealistic to state that it is harmful. But I find it reasonable to say that global warming could be harmful.

I would like to the atmospheric water vapor trend reversed, stopped, or slowed. I do not know which of these is realistically possible. My reasoning for this is that due to the possibility of global warming being harmful I think it is worthwhile to reverse, stop, or slow global warming. Again I do not know what is realisticly possible.

I think an obvious way to do this is to reverse, stop, or slow atmospheric carbon dioxide. Again, I do not know what is realisticly possible.
TrishS@CigarBid
12 years ago

yes. we didn't want bloody to know about it but now that you know so will he.

teedubbya wrote:


Are you saying that this is one of Blood's aliases?
ZRX1200
12 years ago
Man isn't going to change the Suns radiation dude.
DrafterX
12 years ago
We could build a dome... 😟
tailgater
12 years ago

TG, now I think I understand your point so I will try to better state my point.

After reading HD's point about water vapor I read an article from NASA that explained that atmospheric water vapor is a cause of global warming. It also stated that increasing atmospheric carbon dioxide increases atmospheric water vapor. Global warming is far to complex of an issue to state that it is man made. But I find it reasonable to say part of global warming could be man made. Also due to the complexity of global warming it is unrealistic to state that it is harmful. But I find it reasonable to say that global warming could be harmful.

I would like to the atmospheric water vapor trend reversed, stopped, or slowed. I do not know which of these is realistically possible. My reasoning for this is that due to the possibility of global warming being harmful I think it is worthwhile to reverse, stop, or slow global warming. Again I do not know what is realisticly possible.

I think an obvious way to do this is to reverse, stop, or slow atmospheric carbon dioxide. Again, I do not know what is realisticly possible.

gryphonms wrote:



Excellent post.
I highlighted the problem. although you admit it may not be "possible", that's not the issue. The issue is whether it would have any measurable effect.

Obama, algore, and the legion of minions have decided that it DOES have an impact. They formulate taxes and fees and laws and mandates penalties based on their assumptions. Assumptions that even NASA has determined are inaccurate at best.

If the only thing you ever knew about climate change came from that NASA article, you would dismiss CO2 as negligible. Now, ask yourself why you are giving it so much weight.


tailgater
12 years ago

We could build a dome... 😟

DrafterX wrote:



Did you say "do me"?

DrafterX
12 years ago
why would you even think that..??? 🤔
HockeyDad
12 years ago

TG, now I think I understand your point so I will try to better state my point.

After reading HD's point about water vapor I read an article from NASA that explained that atmospheric water vapor is a cause of global warming. It also stated that increasing atmospheric carbon dioxide increases atmospheric water vapor. Global warming is far to complex of an issue to state that it is man made. But I find it reasonable to say part of global warming could be man made. Also due to the complexity of global warming it is unrealistic to state that it is harmful. But I find it reasonable to say that global warming could be harmful.

I would like to the atmospheric water vapor trend reversed, stopped, or slowed. I do not know which of these is realistically possible. My reasoning for this is that due to the possibility of global warming being harmful I think it is worthwhile to reverse, stop, or slow global warming. Again I do not know what is realisticly possible.

I think an obvious way to do this is to reverse, stop, or slow atmospheric carbon dioxide. Again, I do not know what is realisticly possible.

gryphonms wrote:




So basically you don't know if man is causing it, you don't know if it is bad, but dammit you're going to put a stop to it!
victor809
12 years ago

Are you saying that this is one of Blood's aliases?

TrishS@CigarBid wrote:




What sort of ban length would I get if I created a "victor808@cigarbid" username?
DrafterX
12 years ago
seems to me that all we need to do is build a mountain of Silica gel somewhere..... 😟
Users browsing this topic