So what the decision? Vic can't bang dudes, women, or both?

Despite occasional instances of gossip and innuendo (e.g. Pietro Aretino’s suggestions of pederasty), there is no clear evidence of Michelangelo’s homosexuality or, at least, none indicating overt sexual activity. Indeed, Condivi claimed that Michelangelo was chaste.

Try again.

I heard he'd do ANYTHING for 3 fingers.


























Of scotch.

As a student of history I do know that Michelangelo was very good with nunchucks. And although it's not available on the East Coast I'm sure he would have loved Papa Murphy's pizza.

Cowabunga dude.

How many chapels did he finally paint in all..?? 😕

16

OK SD just for you and to add some diversity, Jane Addams. You just had to keepe honest. LOL!

I believe Addams looks forced her into it, I blame a society trained to accept people who look like the women in Cosmo, therefore leaving her without a male counterpart.

Next.

While I appreciate literacy isn't stressed at whatever... middle school ... you graduated, you do realize you never actually ASKED me a question, right? I mean, you put a bunch of question marks in your post, but you didn't actually ask a coherent question.

Let's examine:

When you start a paragraph with "what about them" without specifying what ABOUT THEM I'm supposed to consider, you're not going to make a strong point.


I'm going to assume this is a single thought, despite the fact you threw a period in the middle of it. But even if I take that period out, you don't have a full sentence. A long, run-on, non-sentence yes. But not a full sentence. You end it with a question mark but don't actually ask a question. And, to top it all off you've got some "genetic mindset" phrase in there which I don't even understand what orifice you pulled it from. A 5th grader could compose a more coherent thought.


Again... not a question. You make some assumptions here, but never ask a question.

So, to sum it up: You're an idiot with below 5th grade reading and writing comprehension. You never asked me a coherent question and when I asked you to clarify what you were attempting to say you accuse me of "deflection".

If you are going to try arguing on the internet, please learn to form simple sentences. If you want me to answer your questions, please try to form complete sentences.

Given your poor ability to express yourself, I'm not even sure how to tackle your arguments (I don't even know what they are). You never told me whether or not I should be allowed to have sex with my girlfriend, I mean we aren't going to pop out any kids ever... you seem to be against that. And I certainly hope that the only sex you ever have is solely for procreation... remember, that means it's offensive if you have sex past menopause.

I'm not sure where that picture is from. May have been a photo-chop. Do you have a link?
As for "organized entity" I believe the code states that "society" flags can be on the same flagpole, but again have to be below, smaller, raised later, lowered first. The picture I saw doesn't appear to violate any flag code.

According to TCBY the requirements for non "WRONG" sex (his words) is that there be offspring.

That means the following:

No bjs (straight or gay)
No anal (straight or gay)
No handjobs
No gay sex at all
No birth control sex
No c0meshots (straight or gay)
No sex if you have a vasectomy
No sex if you had a hysterectomy
No sex if the woman is post-menopausal
No sex if you plan on aborting it later

I'm guessing masturbation's out too... unless that's gonna turn into a baby.

I sure hope TCBY follows all those rules, otherwise that would make him some sort of hypocrite. We all know there's no chance of that.

Your Honor, I object this line of questioning.....

Overruled. Now sit down and shut up!

Bailiff, wack his pee pee

UUMMMM ... in the most heterosexual way possible, right?

Tempest in a teapot.

You've seen brew's pee pee?

TRIPPIN' IN COURT
Re: "bailiff, whack his pee-pee"


IT'S FROM A COMEDY SKIT CHEECH AND CHONG DO ON THEIR FIRST ALBUM CALLED TRIPPIN' IN COURT.