See... this is the sort of stuff I find funny.
Ok. First, let me say it again... your whole "play nice with terrorists" thing is a strawman. In case you don't understand what a strawman is (I know, you skipped class that day too).. YOU created the argument in your own head, because in YOUR head that's what you think I want. Then you say I want us all to do it, and demand I defend against it. I never said anything about playing nice with anyone. You can drop that entire argument (except then you're left with nothing... which is why you're clinging to it).
On the other hand, you've now gone and stated that you'd practically take joy in beheading an unarmed, tied up terrorist in custody... because you're convinced that it's your "civic duty" and that you have to "even the score" and "level the playing field"... Most interestinly, it's because you "know I did what I HAD TO DO"... are you so afraid of an unarmed, tied up person in your custody that the only option you feel is available to you is to kill them? I'm pretty sure there are other options available... maybe better, maybe worse... but beheading definitely doesn't fit under "HAD TO DO"....and for some strange reason you want me nearby while you're on your "beheading unarmed people" spree.
What I find most ironic about the entire thing... your justification... "They ARE ANIMALS in the 1st degree" that's the same justification they use to justify their beheading of infidels. What was I just saying earlier about sinking to their level???
victor809 wrote: