dstieger
11 years ago

While everyone is distracted by the gay-homo militant extremists crying outrage, a brand new war in Yemen broke out.

HockeyDad wrote:




Its about time we had different Middle East factions, defined by their religions, killing each other. Totally new concept for a war.
HockeyDad
11 years ago

Any one here actually read the law in question?

rfenst wrote:




What law?
DrafterX
11 years ago
Sounds like Arkansas jumped on board... 😟
HockeyDad
11 years ago
Maybe now people will stop persecuting Christians.
Speyside
11 years ago
HD:

Sounds like an opportunity for you to make money there. Otherwise why would you care?
QMPASH
11 years ago


If it isn't about race, a business owner should be able to refuse any customer, do we want to force;

A publisher to print books for NAMBLA or even porn

A gun dealer to sell guns to skin heads, religious nuts

A liquor store to sell to a drunk person

Gene363 wrote:


Your argument is specious, at best. A publisher can publish ANYTHING they want and refuse ANY manuscript they desire, legally. Gun dealers are already selling guns to these people, albeit illegally (in most cases.) And, in most states, it is illegal to sell liquor, especially in a bar, to someone who is drunk. On the other hand, the Indiana Law COULD be interpreted to mean that a restaurant, for just one example, could refuse to serve a Black, Jews, Muslims, Blue Collar workers or any other group.
dstieger
11 years ago

Here is a good article on this law with some insightful history.

"Everybody's Lost Their Goddamn Mind Over Religious Freedom" - 🌫

http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2015/04/01/everybody-s-lost-their-goddamn-mind-over-religious-freedom.html 

Both conservatives and liberals aren’t being straight about the Religious Freedom Restoration Act.

Buckwheat wrote:




If nobody's completely straight, then why would they discriminate against gays?


Appreciate the link. I hadn't been aware of this:

"....didn’t you know that being anti-Christian is “the last acceptable prejudice”?—"

I thought bashing the Religious Right was cool, and edgy....but it turns out that I'm just mainstream....I'm ok with that, but a little deflated
HockeyDad
11 years ago

HD:

Sounds like an opportunity for you to make money there. Otherwise why would you care?

Speyside wrote:



Well you have my attention....I'm just not seeing any money-making opportunity in this current dust-up.

Protest signs....confetti...I think Walmart will already have the raw materials for the protesters covered.
DrafterX
11 years ago
Lawmakers Defend Chaplain Accused of Anti-Gay Discrimination


Now that a rampaging mob of liberals has bullied the state of Indiana into submission, I want to direct your attention to what they're trying to do to a Navy Chaplain.

Wes Modder is a 19-year veteran of the military based at an officer's training school in South Carolina. This man once ministered to our Navy SEALs. But now he is facing what could be the end of his highly decorated military career.

A gay officer filed a complaint against Chaplain Modder, accusing him of failing to show tolerance and respect in private counseling sessions. The officer was specifically upset about Modder's Christian beliefs.

Chaplain Modder is endorsed by the Assemblies of God, a denomination that believes premarital sex is a sin, as well as homosexual behavior. The officer took offense and accused Modder of discrimination.

Now Congress is getting involved. Nearly three dozen lawmakers sent a letter to the Secretary of the Navy demanding answers. I have an exclusive copy of that letter.

The lawmakers point out that the Catholic Church and the Southern Baptist Convention hold the same beliefs on marriage and homosexuality that the Assemblies of God hold, writing this:

"It is dangerous to fall prey to the fundamentally false proposition that individuals who support natural marriage can only be motivated by animus for others."

The Navy seems to regard chaplains as glorified summer camp counselors, dispensing secular platitudes and lollipops. Folks, this smells like a set-up. Why else would a gay officer who's married to another man seek out an evangelical chaplain for advice?

It seems to me if you take offense at the counsel of a Christian chaplain, don't go to a Christian chaplain.

Film at 11... 😟
victor809
11 years ago



Then they also enjoy the FREEDOM of moving where they feel welcome or in this case " catered to "

TMCTLT wrote:



Ah got it. It's simply a "you don't look like you belong here" situation. They're free to not live in that community.

That sounds about what I'd expect from you.
TMCTLT
11 years ago

Folks that believe in an invisible deity (or plural in some cases) and they discriminate their fellow human beings based on those beliefs are just idiots. Plain and simple.
Now off to my smoke.

Mr Roso wrote:




You have a point to some extent as I nor anyone can prove his (GOD's ) existence, however nor can you or any other athiest prove that HE doesn't . IDIOT....plain and simple



Ah got it. It's simply a "you don't look like you belong here" situation. They're free to not live in that community.

That sounds about what I'd expect from you.

victor809 wrote:






@ least you KNOW what to expect...more than I can say for the LGBT crowd
namadio
11 years ago

Talk about confusing......how on one hand can you feel SO strongly about Gov. staying out of business owners ability to run their business as they see fit AND still be disappointed in our Governor for giving business owners the ability to enjoy some form of protection against being forced out of business by those who are forcing their world view on others????

TMCTLT wrote:



I'm disappointed that it requires a law for business owners to be able to run their business as they see fit. What I should have said was "As a hoosier, I'm dissapointed in the requirement for this law."

No Shoes, No Shirt, NO SERVICE.

jetblasted wrote:



No shnirt. No Shnoes. No Snervice. I'm snerious.
victor809
11 years ago

You have a point to some extent as I nor anyone can prove his (GOD's ) existence, however nor can you or any other athiest prove that HE doesn't . IDIOT....plain and simple

TMCTLT wrote:



And that argument right there, is why you would never be accused of great thinking.
TMCTLT
11 years ago

And that argument right there, is why you would never be accused of great thinking.

victor809 wrote:




Oh hey everybody....did you know that VICKY is a Great Thinker......Take a bow cupcake =d>
Speyside
11 years ago
HD:

Pitchforks, store owners will need a way to remove non compliant GBLT people from their stores. There is also the possibility to up sell tar and feathers.
Speyside
11 years ago
Drafter, your post is interesting, buy we are talking apples and oranges.

The Indiana law allows businesses to use it against civil rights suits brought by individuals, or at least how I interpret the law.

Your post relates to the free exercise of religion. This is a first amendment issue where congressional intervention is against the law, or at least that is how I interpret the 1st amendment.
HockeyDad
11 years ago


It seems to me if you take offense at the counsel of a Christian chaplain, don't go to a Christian chaplain.

DrafterX wrote:




He prolly should have went to a Muslim chaplain.
HockeyDad
11 years ago

HD:

Pitchforks, store owners will need a way to remove non compliant GBLT people from their stores. There is also the possibility to up sell tar and feathers.

Speyside wrote:




I'm not falling for another "invest in pitchforks" scheme. When this all settles there prolly won't have even been a single incident of a store owner removing a GBLT.

Tar is better suited for paving roads on shovel-ready projects. Gay-homo militant extremists would prolly like having just feathers thrown at them.
DrafterX
11 years ago

Drafter, your post is interesting, buy we are talking apples and oranges.

Speyside wrote:




not really.. the flower guy and the preacher dude were just minding their own business when they got hit with this crap... I consider them both the victims... 😟
victor809
11 years ago

Oh hey everybody....did you know that VICKY is a Great Thinker......Take a bow cupcake =d>

TMCTLT wrote:



So you're happier simply acknowledging that your argument is completely devoid of logic?

This may be indicative of the greater problem here.

Seriously... when someone states that there is no proof of something's existence, and you acknowledge that... to come back with "but you can't prove it doesn't exist" is not in any way an equivalent argument. You have to realize that... right? I mean, if you don't, I have to ask who ties your shoes....

"There is no evidence mermaids exist."
"Oh-Ho! But you have no evidence that they don't exist!!!"

By that logic everything (and I mean literally everything) which any person can imagine (man-bear-pig anyone?) has equal potential for existence, and equal relevance in your eyes.
Users browsing this topic