The pizza shop owners are being rewarded by like-minded people for sticking to their principles. The people who donate consider it a worthwhile cause, and money well spent. It provides a "wealth" of proof that the liberal media's militant pro-homosexual agenda is NOT being accepted, and is in fact dead wrong.

Gofundme provides more than just electronic panhandling - there's plenty of that - but it also provides in some circumstances a vehicle for the masses to put their money where their mouth is - an increasingly excellent way for the public to speak out against bad media attempts to sway or create the news. Its far more than panhandling.

Another recent happening would be 2 seperate extremely successful Gofundme campaigns for officer Darren Wilson. The media tried to villify this man for doing his job. The people spoke out through donations both to help him and his family, but also as a thumb in the eye to the liberal media creeps.

Both are great examples of good people portraying some of those "dumb" convictions the liberals so despise.

Time for lunch - Chik-fil-A anyone?

Bitter Klinger wrote:

Colorado double standard: Bakers should not be forced to make anti-gay cakes
Published April 07, 2015



Film at 11.... 🤔

DrafterX wrote:

An interesting concept. So you're saying you'll give me money for going out and denying people rights or shooting someone?

I think you need to start to be a little concerned about the incentive situation you're putting in place here. In both these situations the people are theoretically walking away with more money than they would earn if they hadn't ended up in the spotlight.

victor809 wrote:

An interesting concept. So you're saying you'll give me money for going out and denying people rights or shooting someone?

I think you need to start to be a little concerned about the incentive situation you're putting in place here. In both these situations the people are theoretically walking away with more money than they would earn if they hadn't ended up in the spotlight.

victor809 wrote:

People just need to stop being so durn sensitive, and understand that everyone has different beliefs, and backgrounds.

Whatever floats your boat and doesn't hurt others.

Life is too short.

C'est la vie!

Carp 80 M!

So ein mist...

Hillbillyjosh770 wrote:

It wasn't a dumb decision to stick to their principles when the libtard media came "in search of" what they found - christians who are proud of their morals & values, and who are not afraid to say so when asked. And thats the right thing to do, and thats why theyre being rewarded, much to your chagrin. It wasn't "dumb" to answer a question honestly. The Gofundme account clearly proves that.

The media went trolling for pizza shop, they didn't search out the wannabe reporter. She tried to manufacture another "poor discriminated homosexual" story, and it blew up in her face just like the bad Rolling Stone reporter that cried rape. Now that UVA is finally sueing RS, lets watch as she eventually gets "downsized". Alongside her editor. The whole rag deserves to be downsized out of publication, but hey, as you said earlier, if that's what people want to spend their money on...

The bill in Indiana isn't getting changed except to add worthless verbage that won't affect the overall intent of the bill to begin with. It just shut the libtards up, as designed.

Dude, you're in a hole again. Stop digging. You're pushing yourself down the stairs this time.

Bitter Klinger wrote:

The revised legislation prohibits providers from using the law as a legal defense for refusing to provide services, goods, facilities or accommodations. It also bars discrimination based on factors that include race, religion, disability, sexual orientation, gender identity or United States military service

fox news wrote:

If you people give me a million dollars, I will refuse to bake Victor a gay-homo pizza. Heck, I'll do it for half a million.

HockeyDad wrote:

About the only thing you are right in that statement is that the media went trolling.

1 - It's dumb to answer any question when the person has no business asking it. The phrase "that's not any of your business" is the smart answer.

2 - I have no "chagrin" over these businesses taking your hard earned money. I look at it like one of those dumb mega-churches that get ridiculously rich off the donations of thousands of lower income people. They say what you want to hear and you give them money. As long as it isn't MY money, I could care less.



That doesn't sound to me like a worthless change. Perhaps you've read the bill yourself? Or did you hear from an email chain forwarded from someone's grandfather?

The rest of your nonsense is just that... nonsense attempting to link this to some completely unrelated tripe.

victor809 wrote:

Victor, stop. You cannot deny that had she refused to answer, or answered with a "MYOB" gist, the need to create the Gofundme account would'nt have been there at all. But she bravely chose not to deny her beliefs, even in the face of the media. She is living proof that sticking to one's morals & values does indeed pay - sometimes quickly and handsomely. Moreover, she chose not to deny her maker to any man, and I feel that will bring her a larger "reward" than any amount of money ever will.

Bitter Klinger wrote:

It wasn't dumb for her to answer, it was dumb for the reporter to have asked the dumb question in the first place.

Oh, and you do care - because if you didn't you wouldn't have bothered with the replies. You know what else was dumb? Letting on that it bothers you - because I'm having a lot more fun with it than you should have allowed me to.

Hahaha! [frypan] [frypan] [frypan]