midmofan
Tuesday, July 21, 2015 12:56:44 AM

Um, that's what she said?

SmokeMonkey wrote:

It's good but might not hold your interest for the whole 8.5 inches.

cameroon
Wednesday, July 22, 2015 11:46:49 AM
With all due respect, people who pay for these cigars ought to have their heads examined. Not only are you doing the manufacturer's market research for them, you are paying for the privilege. THEY should be paying YOU.
midmofan
Wednesday, July 22, 2015 1:55:30 PM

With all due respect, people who pay for these cigars ought to have their heads examined. Not only are you doing the manufacturer's market research for them, you are paying for the privilege. THEY should be paying YOU.

cameroon wrote:

With all due respect, and with pretty petals of love flowers tossed at your feet, it takes quite a Ash@le for someone in their very first post to say other people need their head examined.

Manufacturers sell products they are testing out all the time. Dorito Tacos anyone?And they are completely up front about what is going on. Moreover, I enjoy doing it, its my money, my cigars, my choice. I also, at least for now, have found some sticks i really really enjoy for about $2 per. So there.

How about you try to contribute something?

Better Yet.

Go slither away....with all due respect of course

opelmanta1900
Wednesday, July 22, 2015 2:12:53 PM
you didn't get paid to eat your dorito's loco taco? why else would anyone ever eat one of those?
midmofan
Wednesday, July 22, 2015 2:27:19 PM

you didn't get paid to eat your dorito's loco taco? why else would anyone ever eat one of those?

opelmanta1900 wrote:

Dorito Tacos (at least at 2am) prove that there is a higher power and that intelligent design is a reality! =p~

Actually the best taco ad/poster I ever saw was at a Jack-in-the-Box. It had photo of their tacos and said "We don't know why they taste better after midnight either...."

SmokeMonkey
Wednesday, July 22, 2015 2:52:50 PM
We need a Blendlab/Nachos Bell Grande pairing review.
midmofan
Wednesday, July 22, 2015 3:52:07 PM

We need a Blendlab/Nachos Bell Grande pairing review.

SmokeMonkey wrote:

tamapatom
Wednesday, July 22, 2015 6:57:07 PM

It's good but might not hold your interest for the whole 8.5 inches.

midmofan wrote:

No, she said you are using the wrong ruler.....those are centimeters!

cameroon
Wednesday, July 22, 2015 7:10:26 PM
I think you will find that was my second post. My first was pointing out the equally wrong-headed notions of another user on the cause of tunneling.

I'm convinced your evident anger is not so much with me, as with yourself, for getting used so transparently by corporate interests. Yes you are free to throw your money down a rathole, but you can scarce feign surprise when others point and stare. I sense you are waking up to this. Hopefully, your case will provide a warning to others considering embarking on the same folly.

Thanks for the flowers.

With all due respect, and with pretty petals of love flowers tossed at your feet, it takes quite a Ash@le for someone in their very first post to say other people need their head examined.

Manufacturers sell products they are testing out all the time. Dorito Tacos anyone?And they are completely up front about what is going on. Moreover, I enjoy doing it, its my money, my cigars, my choice. I also, at least for now, have found some sticks i really really enjoy for about $2 per. So there.

How about you try to contribute something?

Better Yet.

Go slither away....with all due respect of course

midmofan wrote:

midmofan
Wednesday, July 22, 2015 7:55:14 PM
Wow two whole posts and both abusing others lol.
cigarkitty
Thursday, July 23, 2015 10:50:14 AM
What is the pleasure in pointing and staring at others for doing what they want to do with their life? not sure I quite understand. [frypan]

I think you will find that was my second post. My first was pointing out the equally wrong-headed notions of another user on the cause of tunneling.

I'm convinced your evident anger is not so much with me, as with yourself, for getting used so transparently by corporate interests. Yes you are free to throw your money down a rathole, but you can scarce feign surprise when others point and stare. I sense you are waking up to this. Hopefully, your case will provide a warning to others considering embarking on the same folly.

Thanks for the flowers.

cameroon wrote:

Speyside
Thursday, July 23, 2015 1:08:51 PM
Trolls like to do that.
cigarkitty
Thursday, July 23, 2015 1:10:57 PM
That's fine. I'm the troller of trolls
Speyside
Thursday, July 23, 2015 1:15:57 PM
LOL.
midmofan
Monday, July 27, 2015 9:59:57 AM
update on YH-456 in #36 above, wish I had found these at the beginning of summer!

Also some new ones on the way, reports soon!

tamapatom
Monday, July 27, 2015 2:35:16 PM
Just had a QB 552. Anyone else tried one of these? A splotchy dark grainy wrapper. Perfect burn. Long white ash. Flavorful maduro. Medium strong but no pepper. Glad I tried my first blendlab.....was worth it to drop a single onto my order. Sorry that I have no experience describing things in a review. Worth a try for you Blendlab testers.
midmofan
Monday, July 27, 2015 3:54:34 PM

Just had a QB 552. Anyone else tried one of these? A splotchy dark grainy wrapper. Perfect burn. Long white ash. Flavorful maduro. Medium strong but no pepper. Glad I tried my first blendlab.....was worth it to drop a single onto my order. Sorry that I have no experience describing things in a review. Worth a try for you Blendlab testers.

tamapatom wrote:

Have not had this but wondering if it is related to the QB-5552 (reviewed above) they look similar on the mothership.

99cobra2881
Monday, July 27, 2015 4:07:54 PM
Isn't one 5" long and the other is 5.5" long? Other than that I think they're the same blend?
midmofan
Monday, July 27, 2015 4:42:43 PM

Isn't one 5" long and the other is 5.5" long? Other than that I think they're the same blend?

99cobra2881 wrote:

The description is slightly different at CI, but similar, and they sure LOOK similar from the photos with one a little longer.

tamapatom
Monday, July 27, 2015 5:45:02 PM

The description is slightly different at CI, but similar, and they sure LOOK similar from the photos with one a little longer.

midmofan wrote:

They look similar....but very dark splotches were very prominent on mine and the internet photos do not show clear enough whether that happens on both. One thing I can say is that unlike the review of the 5552, the 552 was a near perfect burn with no touchups needed. Constant billowing smoke, did not ever go out. After an inch and a half I had to flick the ash to get it off. So if it is the same blend they fixed the construction....or I just got lucky.

Mobile! Terms | Privacy | Contact Us | Help | © 1998-2026, CigarBid.com