Some random Anti-AGW bullet points:
On the theme of flat earthers: The models used by "scientists" to test their "theories" and provide "predictions" about our future climate more closely resemble aquariums than an actual place. They are flat-earth models, making AGW an actual flat-earth theory.
Recent scientific discoveries have greatly downgraded the greenhouse effect of CO2. The AGW industry hasn't quite caught up to that yet.
During the Phenarozoic period, atmospheric CO2 concentrations have been as much as 10 times the current amount, well over the threshold for supposed runaway global warming, but the earth has experienced warming and cooling cycles that don't correlate at all to CO2.
The temperature range for earth over the last half a billion years has been roughly14C to 24C. During approximately 2/3 of those half billion years the earth has been close to that 24C upper limit. For the other 1/3 we've been close to the lower limit. The periods during which the earth experiences temperature in the intermediate range are typically very short, ~12000 years is the norm.
Our current interglacial period is about that long so we should expect either a rapid cooling (return to a few hundred thousand years of glaciation) or warming (many millions of years of tropical heat) sometime soon.
The entire industry bases their models on the data provided by a couple of very secretive groups. The actual raw data is not made available to the scientific community, rather the set released has been "corrected" prior to being employed in modelling.
Computer modelling and predictions aren't science. Actual science requires experimentation that is falsifiable, verifiable and repeatable. On many factors, what is often called AGW theory barely qualifies as conjecture, let alone as a hypothesis. Yet we are told to accept it as fact.
eric.feldkamp wrote:
