I never justified lying for any reason.
cacman wrote:
One little photo isn't going to hurt her
cacman wrote:
That's the same justification shoplifters use for stealing a candy bar from a big corporation
She lied about Benhgazi so a little 'photoshop' on an old photo is fair. Tit for tat.
cacman wrote:
This is a clear justification. Tit for tat is by definition justifying one action because of another.
4 people didn't die because of the photo
cacman wrote:
This is justifying something based off "the repercussions of doing this bad thing aren't AS BAD as doing what THEY did"... it's the same crap school kids do.
Who really cares if the flag in the pic is real of fake. The facts are that her crimes against this Country are real, and she should be put on the fire and held accountable!
cacman wrote:
^ not 100% sure you're justifying it here... since the post isn't about any benghazi crap, I'm assuming you are attempting to justify by bringing in unrelated statements....
Do you want me to find more?
I did say there's nothing wrong with a little satire, especially considering what she has done. I've said many times, WGAF if the photo is real. It was not presented as fact in this instance, nor have I suggested it to be fact. I thinks it's hysterical and have taken it purely for the joke that it is. You and others have turned into some sort of moral debate defending a woman who has no morales.
cacman wrote:
You may be doubling down on the whole "it was satire!" bs, but it clearly isn't. Gene didn't post it as satire (in fact he tried to defend it). In fact, you state in this thread:
When did Snopes become the truth of all truths??
cacman wrote:
This is in direct conflict with your statement that you knew it was satire... if you knew it was satire, why would you question the source that says it is false? You're contradicting yourself all over the place here.
You can twist my words anyway you want, and think of me however you want. IDGAF. It still won't justify supporting her over a stupid photoshopped image created to stir controversy and distract away from the facts of what she's really done.
cacman wrote:
Dude... if you actually gave a crap about "the facts of what she's really done" then you'd be more irritated by what is clearly an attempt to manufacture outrage. You don't give a crap about benghazi or any other bs. You only whip it out when you're trying to justify other lies and manufactured scandals about this politician. And your assumption that I "support her" is ridiculous. If you consider calling people out for lies equivalent to "support" of a person, then you are once again, as above, justifying lying as long as it's for your cause. Grow some integrity.
You question my integrity??? LMFAO!!! Go beat-up another homeless person to make yourself feel good.
cacman wrote:
Tell me. What does beating up a homeless man have to do with integrity? I didn't lie about it. I didn't create a photoshop of you beating up a homeless guy and claim it was satire after it was proven wrong. I would do what I did again in a second.
