teddyballgame
10 years ago
Reaganomics IS the answer.

Free market capitalism IS the answer.

Trickle down economics works.

Unlike Obama, the black work force increased their standard of living under Reagan- immensely.

So, yeah.. I am that guy.

Brewha
  • Brewha
  • Herf-A-Holic Topic Starter
10 years ago
πŸ˜‚



Reaganomics is like giving one dog a wiener and expecting him to share….
DrafterX
10 years ago
Brewha
  • Brewha
  • Herf-A-Holic Topic Starter
10 years ago
DrafterX
10 years ago
we had a black lab in our neighborhood that used to bring my puppy-dog bones and stuff.... he was a good dog.. RIP Jake.. πŸ™
Brewha
  • Brewha
  • Herf-A-Holic Topic Starter
10 years ago
Sounds like a really nice dog there drafter.

He was prolly a liberal.....
DrafterX
10 years ago
he ate a lotta dirt and dead fish and stuff.... 😟
Brewha
  • Brewha
  • Herf-A-Holic Topic Starter
10 years ago
Hmmmm - he could be more conservative than I thought....

And he tried to give you puppy-dog a bone...
DrafterX
10 years ago
Only dog I ever seen dig a hole just to eat the dirt... he was a good boy tho... 😞
Brewha
  • Brewha
  • Herf-A-Holic Topic Starter
10 years ago
Poor Jake.....
DrafterX
10 years ago



And he tried to give you puppy-dog a bone...

Brewha wrote:





he brought her bones all the time... he even brought her a deer head once... freaked my wife out a little tho... 😟
tailgater
10 years ago

Well, I told you we would likely disagree….

But I am not suggesting we legislate pay scales based on need rather than worth. I am suggesting that fulltime employment (40 hrs) have a wage that is sufficient to live on – without guvmut aid.
You are right about the part-time trick. Companies do that now to weasel out of benefits. And it is another reason that a minimal hourly wage is needed.

And yes, I would agree that small firms should have special roles to foster startups and mom & pop shops.

Brewha wrote:



Sufficient to live on.

In Oshkosh Wisconsin? Or in NYC?

Either way, why should company X pay an unreasonably high wage for unskilled labor?
Why should the government tell them what a shelf-stocker should be paid?
teddyballgame
10 years ago

πŸ˜‚



Reaganomics is like giving one dog a wiener and expecting him to share….

Brewha wrote:



First off, keep your wiener in your pants, congressman.

Secondly, your simile is weak.

Like trying to explain to a democrat that the absolute merit of a program is not how it makes him feel, but if the program works or not.
Kawak
10 years ago
After each liberal santa spoke one could only conclude,

What you've just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul.

MACS
10 years ago
Billy Madison reference... nice!
DCLover
10 years ago

how does it work..?? is it per kid..?? πŸ˜•

DrafterX wrote:


First off, cash assistance is not called welfare anymore. It's called Work First. This name is state specific afaik, but the program's rules are federal. A mother may only draw benefits for 5 years or thereabouts. Benefits are dependent on # of children but duration is not. The time limit goes out the window if you are a guardian (say a grandmother) or an illegal. Other programs have no such time limits (housing, food stamps, medicaid, etc...ad infinitum).
teddyballgame
10 years ago
wJust watched the Dem Debate..

Booooring.

No big topics discussed, why don't they just hand it to Hillary as nobody will go agin' her.

Man, that was a very WHITE stage.

...well, it is the party of slavery, segregation, Jim Crow laws, so par for the course

(that Obama is probably playing on- what is that 300 rounds now?)
banderl
10 years ago
Almost as much as Ike and W, but not quite.
tonygraz
10 years ago

wJust watched the Dem Debate..

Man, that was a very WHITE stage.

...well, it is the party of slavery, segregation, Jim Crow laws, so par for the course

teddyballgame wrote:



That must be why the south always votes democrat.#-o
Brewha
  • Brewha
  • Herf-A-Holic Topic Starter
10 years ago

Sufficient to live on.

In Oshkosh Wisconsin? Or in NYC?

Either way, why should company X pay an unreasonably high wage for unskilled labor?
Why should the government tell them what a shelf-stocker should be paid?

tailgater wrote:


We the people passed the Fair Labor Standards Act in 1938. FLSA was a comprehensive federal scheme which provided for minimum wages, overtime pay, record keeping requirements, and child labor regulations. The purpose of the minimum wage was to stabilize the economy and protect the workers in the labor force. The minimum wage was designed to create a minimum standard of living to protect the health and well-being of employees. Others have argued that the primary purpose was to aid the lowest paid of the nation's working to protect them from predatory business practices.

In short, history shows that laws are needed to protect labor.

Now, the devil is in the details. And perhaps the minimum standard of living should be adjusted regionally. But the need remains.
Users browsing this topic