And he tried to give you puppy-dog a bone...
Brewha wrote:
Well, I told you we would likely disagreeβ¦.But I am not suggesting we legislate pay scales based on need rather than worth. I am suggesting that fulltime employment (40 hrs) have a wage that is sufficient to live on β without guvmut aid.You are right about the part-time trick. Companies do that now to weasel out of benefits. And it is another reason that a minimal hourly wage is needed.And yes, I would agree that small firms should have special roles to foster startups and mom & pop shops.
π Reaganomics is like giving one dog a wiener and expecting him to shareβ¦.
how does it work..?? is it per kid..?? π
DrafterX wrote:
wJust watched the Dem Debate..Man, that was a very WHITE stage....well, it is the party of slavery, segregation, Jim Crow laws, so par for the course
teddyballgame wrote:
Sufficient to live on.In Oshkosh Wisconsin? Or in NYC?Either way, why should company X pay an unreasonably high wage for unskilled labor?Why should the government tell them what a shelf-stocker should be paid?
tailgater wrote:
The CigarBid Forums uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close