I see some different numbers and thought the poll questions were flawed. The survey was done in August before the DMV closing spree in a southern state may have been news. .

tonygraz wrote:

Republicans are always trying to restrict the vote because a big turnout means pub loss.

tonygraz wrote:

Yes that is always the case, you "see some different numbers"- dems like to re-write facts and history to fit their agenda.

This isn't a one off poll.
Time and time again polls such as this have shown these numbers.
Go on, try and find some polls of "your numbers" that tell a different tale.

And exactly how does this suppress voter turnout? Virtually everyone has a photo ID.

Here is some facts from this link:

http://dailysignal.com/2012/02/24/heritage-vs-aclu-at-voter-id-debate/ 

A case brought by the ACLU in Georgia against its ID law was dismissed by a federal judge because the ACLU could not produce any witnesses who would be unable to vote because of the ID requirement.

voter turnout actually increased after the Georgia and Indiana laws were put in place. In 2008, the turnout of Democratic voters increased more than 6 percentage points in Georgia over the 2004 election when there was no photo ID law in effect, and it increased more than 8 percentage points in Indiana.







There are never big turnouts that end in republican wins

Except that time when Ronald Reagan won in 2 landslides.

The second one he won EVERY state but Minnesota (by 3000 votes).
By your president's count that is 56 out of "57 states" that your brilliant leader thinks make up the U.S.

But I guess that is because nobody turned out to vote for Ronaldus Magnus

teddyballgame wrote:

and I suppose in Chicago there were no dead people voting for JFK?

C'mon Covfireman.. don't be a sap.

teddyballgame wrote: