I saw what a test .223 round did to put a hole through 8" of steel.

tonygraz wrote:

And became the inspiration for Lars Teton....

tailgater wrote:

Your blatant lie about a .223 round through 8 inches of steel makes your point . All anti gun people are liars. Like you.

Covfireman wrote:

When someone tells you something you didn't know was possible, do you always call them a liars ?
Maybe you are just too stupid to know what is really possible.

tonygraz wrote:

I saw what a test .223 round did to put a hole through 8" of steel.

tonygraz wrote:

When someone tells you something you didn't know was possible, do you always call them a liars ?
Maybe you are just too stupid to know what is really possible.

tonygraz wrote:

FWIW, 1 inch thick glass will stop a .223 round shot from 25 yards.

Abrignac wrote:

I'll admit it I don't know everything that's possible . I do know that a .223 bullet can't have the mass needed to penetrate a 8 inch piece of steel . It doesn't matter on the bullet specs if it was depleted uranium the bullet can't maintain the energy to penetrate 2 inches of steel . 8 inches is asinine at best or a bald face liar . I'm not Einstein but he's did find the formula that give you the answer.

Covfireman wrote:

Sounds like transparent aluminum... 😟

DrafterX wrote:

As a point of science, a .223 bullet is fully capable of penetrating 8” thick steel in a molten state, and has plenty of mass to do so. However, propelled from a conventional gun it would lack the required velocity.

I suppose if you shot the bullet from space towards the sun, allowing for gravitational acceleration, it would gain the required velocity. But you would need really, really good aim......

Brewha wrote:

Fixed it for you.....

Does I suppose carry the same weight as I'd guess....I'm guessing it does ( no weight @ all )

TMCTLT wrote:

Tonygraz just doesn't know what a full 8" looks like in front of him.


BEHIND him is another story...

tailgater wrote: