That was Mick Jagger.

DrMaddVibe wrote:

Too late boss, I already did....

But all seriousness aside, what is ironic about a transsexual getting chit from the LBGT crowd for voting Republican?

It's like being a religious fundamentalist on a deer hunt and telling your bros you vote Democrat.

Brewha wrote:

Was he the one without a heart or the one without a brain?

opelmanta1900 wrote:

Tail... You do realize there is a difference between acceptance of sexual identity or sexuality, and acceptance of anyone's "ideas".

Pretty sure the LGBT crowd isn't accepting of Hitler...

So, if we can establish an extreme where we are confident they wouldn't be accepting... We can work back to determine how much like Hitler a Republican is....

(That's a joke for the dumbazzes)

victor809 wrote:

You don't see the irony?

The LGBT crowd preaches acceptance above all else.

Webster couldn't define any better.

edit:

the book dude. Not the short black actor kid.

tailgater wrote:

The hitler reference aside, your analogy lacks perspective.

The bastions of conservative versus liberal tendencies has predated "sexual identity" by about 4,000 years.

Sure, there were gay people in pre-biblical times. But they weren't identified by their sexual tendencies. They were who they were. People cared or they didn't.

Nowadays we are expected to accept and embrace. Lest we take the verboten decision to comment or critique and be labeled a hater.

At the end of the day, the LGBT crowd is no less a hate filled organization as the right wing bible thumpers.

There.

I said it.

tailgater wrote:

The hitler reference aside, your analogy lacks perspective.

The bastions of conservative versus liberal tendencies has predated "sexual identity" by about 4,000 years.

Sure, there were gay people in pre-biblical times. But they weren't identified by their sexual tendencies. They were who they were. People cared or they didn't.

Nowadays we are expected to accept and embrace. Lest we take the verboten decision to comment or critique and be labeled a hater.

At the end of the day, the LGBT crowd is no less a hate filled organization as the right wing bible thumpers.

There.

I said it.

tailgater wrote:

I thought when victor talked about a strawman I thought that was slang for a dude with a suck able ******.

teedubbya wrote:

Tail... ignore sexual identity then. You're claim is that the LGBT crowd (or the liberals, if you want to avoid discussing sexual identity) only will accept and embrace, otherwise you're a "hater".

Yet I posit that 98.2% of all liberals and/or LGBT supporters would say they would not be accepting of Hitler's views. Yes I know hitler is a bit extreme, but if my assumption is correct (please, correct me if you think liberals and/or LGBT supporters would say "hitler rocks") then that means the group does not accept every ideology, and the liberals and/or LGBT have no problem with not accepting at least one ideology without self-identifying as "haters".

victor809 wrote:

I mean the LGBT folks gave him flack for voting against his own life style (which is ironic) but they didn't reject him...

.

Brewha wrote:

I think it's clear Victor identifies himself well with Hitler having a tiny one and only one ball... 😟

DrafterX wrote: