Poll Question: Is Global Warming Real?
Brewha
  • Brewha
  • Herf-A-Holic Topic Starter
10 years ago
I reckon "unapproachable" would be the term. Unless one would be more uncomplimentary.
But a smart girl none the less.
Brewha
  • Brewha
  • Herf-A-Holic Topic Starter
10 years ago

This is too good to leave on that other thread:

banderl wrote:


And here I thought people were losing their sence of humor.

Thx Bro
DrafterX
10 years ago
I heard hyenas used to eat peoples... 😟
banderl
10 years ago

I heard hyenas used to eat peoples... 😟

DrafterX wrote:




No, that would be dingoes, and they eat babies.
DrafterX
10 years ago
Those bassards. .!! 😠
DrafterX
10 years ago
But back on topic. .. the global warming peoples aren't paid..?? 😕
frankj1
10 years ago

Wasn't Betsy a Miss America or something?

banderl wrote:


Bess Myerson.
Betsy Palmer was in Oklahoma or some such musical.
frankj1
10 years ago

But back on topic. .. the global warming peoples aren't paid..?? 😕

DrafterX wrote:


well yeah, that's been said a thousand times here.

I just never heard anyone who agrees with the deniers ask about their money trail so I thought I'd bring it up...in the interest of fair play
banderl
10 years ago
Been cold here.
frankj1
10 years ago

Been cold here.

banderl wrote:


science disproved.
banderl
banderl
10 years ago

Bess Myerson.
Betsy Palmer was in Oklahoma or some such musical.

frankj1 wrote:




Sorry, I was thinking about Vanessa Williams.
MACS
10 years ago
Interesting links, brewha. Both sides are paying their scientists, though... so that argument is moot.

I don't believe the 97% consensus, and I do believe that politicians, environmentalists and the media are capitalizing on something that, yes... is a problem, but not as big as they'd like you to believe it is.
victor809
10 years ago
Hang on. Why is the argument moot because both sides are profiting when brewha brings up a point... but when you post a video from Prager "university" saying one side is being influenced it's suddenly some sort of interesting insight?
Speyside
10 years ago
I'm with you MACS, the concensus is 98.2%.
MACS
10 years ago

Hang on. Why is the argument moot because both sides are profiting when brewha brings up a point... but when you post a video from Prager "university" saying one side is being influenced it's suddenly some sort of interesting insight?

victor809 wrote:



My point isn't the 'profit'. Scientists are funded, as you know, which is how they pay for their work. One would like to think that scientists would be scientific and report results, not manipulate them. In the video, Lindzen is purporting that both sides of climate scientists agree on many points, and disagree on a few. It's the last group saying the sky is falling.

But in the end, I guess it comes down to who you choose to believe. You guys believe one side, I believe the other.
DrafterX
10 years ago
I think the real question here is 'Who's paying Brewha..??'... 🤔
banderl
10 years ago

Hang on. Why is the argument moot because both sides are profiting when brewha brings up a point... but when you post a video from Prager "university" saying one side is being influenced it's suddenly some sort of interesting insight?

victor809 wrote:




Prager University?
What's the outlook for their football team this year?
tonygraz
10 years ago
1.25 minute quarters ?
Users browsing this topic