Poll Question: Is Global Warming Real?
Brewha
  • Brewha
  • Herf-A-Holic Topic Starter
Friday, April 29, 2016 10:26:07 PM
I reckon "unapproachable" would be the term. Unless one would be more uncomplimentary.

But a smart girl none the less.

Brewha
  • Brewha
  • Herf-A-Holic Topic Starter
Friday, April 29, 2016 10:28:09 PM

This is too good to leave on that other thread:

banderl wrote:

And here I thought people were losing their sence of humor.

Thx Bro

DrafterX
Friday, April 29, 2016 10:39:23 PM
I heard hyenas used to eat peoples... 😟
banderl
Friday, April 29, 2016 10:43:39 PM

I heard hyenas used to eat peoples... 😟

DrafterX wrote:

No, that would be dingoes, and they eat babies.

DrafterX
Friday, April 29, 2016 10:46:17 PM
Those bassards. .!! 😠
DrafterX
Friday, April 29, 2016 10:52:27 PM
But back on topic. .. the global warming peoples aren't paid..?? 😕
frankj1
Friday, April 29, 2016 10:54:13 PM

Wasn't Betsy a Miss America or something?

banderl wrote:

Bess Myerson.

Betsy Palmer was in Oklahoma or some such musical.

frankj1
Friday, April 29, 2016 10:57:24 PM

But back on topic. .. the global warming peoples aren't paid..?? 😕

DrafterX wrote:

well yeah, that's been said a thousand times here.

I just never heard anyone who agrees with the deniers ask about their money trail so I thought I'd bring it up...in the interest of fair play

banderl
Friday, April 29, 2016 10:58:48 PM
Been cold here.
frankj1
Friday, April 29, 2016 11:02:19 PM

Been cold here.

banderl wrote:

science disproved.

banderl
Friday, April 29, 2016 11:03:33 PM
Ha!
banderl
Friday, April 29, 2016 11:07:17 PM

Bess Myerson.

Betsy Palmer was in Oklahoma or some such musical.

frankj1 wrote:

Sorry, I was thinking about Vanessa Williams.

MACS
Saturday, April 30, 2016 12:33:46 AM
Interesting links, brewha. Both sides are paying their scientists, though... so that argument is moot.

I don't believe the 97% consensus, and I do believe that politicians, environmentalists and the media are capitalizing on something that, yes... is a problem, but not as big as they'd like you to believe it is.

victor809
Saturday, April 30, 2016 1:09:01 AM
Hang on. Why is the argument moot because both sides are profiting when brewha brings up a point... but when you post a video from Prager "university" saying one side is being influenced it's suddenly some sort of interesting insight?
Speyside
Saturday, April 30, 2016 8:49:32 AM
I'm with you MACS, the concensus is 98.2%.
MACS
Saturday, April 30, 2016 10:59:40 AM

Hang on. Why is the argument moot because both sides are profiting when brewha brings up a point... but when you post a video from Prager "university" saying one side is being influenced it's suddenly some sort of interesting insight?

victor809 wrote:

My point isn't the 'profit'. Scientists are funded, as you know, which is how they pay for their work. One would like to think that scientists would be scientific and report results, not manipulate them. In the video, Lindzen is purporting that both sides of climate scientists agree on many points, and disagree on a few. It's the last group saying the sky is falling.

But in the end, I guess it comes down to who you choose to believe. You guys believe one side, I believe the other.

DrafterX
Saturday, April 30, 2016 11:26:39 AM
I think the real question here is 'Who's paying Brewha..??'... 🤔
banderl
Saturday, April 30, 2016 12:12:10 PM

Hang on. Why is the argument moot because both sides are profiting when brewha brings up a point... but when you post a video from Prager "university" saying one side is being influenced it's suddenly some sort of interesting insight?

victor809 wrote:

Prager University?

What's the outlook for their football team this year?

tonygraz
Saturday, April 30, 2016 12:57:26 PM
1.25 minute quarters ?
Brewha
  • Brewha
  • Herf-A-Holic Topic Starter
Saturday, April 30, 2016 1:10:58 PM
Mobile! Terms | Privacy | Contact Us | Help | © 1998-2026, CigarBid.com