DrafterX
10 years ago
damn... 😞
DrMaddVibe
10 years ago
http://www.wesh.com/news/shooters-wife-could-face-federal-charges-nbc-news-reports/40067558 


GOOD!


Whatever happened to "See Something, Say Something!"?


All of that information and not to tell authorities...after the FBI had the guy under investigation? Man, we are so screwed as a nation.
teedubbya
10 years ago
If true I hope she rots in jail.

I'm not suggesting or hoping this to be true.... but has the husband wife privilege ever been tested in this sort of case? Would the abusive husband defense work?
DrMaddVibe
10 years ago
I don't know if it would apply towards open acts of terrorism.

She KNEW something was going to happen...she KNEW what he was up to. She KNEW he was into abusing her so if she lets him terrorize the general population she's off the hook?

[-x
teedubbya
10 years ago
I'm not doubting she knew, just wondering if privilege has ever been tested in this sort of case. I hope she rots either way. It just may get interesting though.
Gene363
10 years ago

http://www.wesh.com/news/shooters-wife-could-face-federal-charges-nbc-news-reports/40067558


GOOD!


Whatever happened to "See Something, Say Something!"?


All of that information and not to tell authorities...after the FBI had the guy under investigation? Man, we are so screwed as a nation.

DrMaddVibe wrote:



Good news, too bad she hadn't joined with all those other muslim informant heros that prevented similar tragedies, you like... Oh snap! 🤦 🤦 🤦
DrafterX
10 years ago
If she narked him out the dudes father prolly woulda killed her... 😟
Gene363
10 years ago

I'm not doubting she knew, just wondering if privilege has ever been tested in this sort of case. I hope she rots either way. It just may get interesting though.

teedubbya wrote:



True, we need an expert:

90.504 Husband-wife privilege. (1) A spouse has a privilege during and after the marital relationship to refuse to disclose, and to prevent another from disclosing, communications which were intended to be made in confidence between the spouses while they were husband and wife. (2) The privilege may be claimed by either spouse or by the guardian or conservator of a spouse. The authority of a spouse, or guardian or conservator of a spouse, to claim the privilege is presumed in the absence of contrary evidence. (3) There is no privilege under this section: (a) In a proceeding brought by or on behalf of one spouse against the other spouse. (b) In a criminal proceeding in which one spouse is charged with a crime committed at any time against the person or property of the other spouse, or the person or property of a child of either. (c) In a criminal proceeding in which the communication is offered in evidence by a defendant-spouse who is one of the spouses between whom the communication was made.

Although it seems counter-intuitive, the husband in this case could not refuse to testify against his own wife if subpoenaed by the state. He could always refuse to show up in court, or show up and refuse to testify, but then he would be subjecting himself to the risk of being found in contempt of court.

The marital privilege, therefore, only applies to statements made by one spouse to another during the course of their marriage. The privilege can be asserted by either spouse.





https://www.avvo.com/legal-guides/ugc/the-marital-privilege-in-florida 

DrMaddVibe
10 years ago
Sad...that's the way she chose to play it. MAybe her and Casey Anthony can exchange recipes?
Abrignac
10 years ago
All of a sudden she is silent. Was always suspect of her. Didn't make any sense the way she jumped on the bandwagon the first day.
DrafterX
10 years ago
I think I seen her boobs on the internets once... 😟
Gene363
10 years ago

Sad...that's the way she chose to play it. MAybe her and Casey Anthony can exchange recipes?

DrMaddVibe wrote:



Great idea, perhaps when they meet in hell. 🍺
Abrignac
10 years ago

I think I seen her boobs on the internets once... 😟

DrafterX wrote:




Perky or saggy?
teedubbya
10 years ago
drafters? saggy
DrafterX
10 years ago
teedubbya
10 years ago
victor809
10 years ago
Don't lie to old saggy t|to...
victor809
10 years ago
DrafterX
10 years ago
Tell'em Howard..!! 🤣

Howard Stern gave his two cents on the gun control debate following the Orlando terrorist attack Sunday night.

"I'm so upset about Orlando and what went down," Stern said on his show Wednesday. "But I can't believe these people would come out afterward and their answer to Orlando is to take away guns from the public. It's f----ing mind-blowing to me."

Stern then went on to make an analogy comparing the public to sheep, the terrorists to wolves and the military and police to sheepdogs.

"Now, let’s say I walked up literally to a sheep herd, and they know that every night the wolves pick off a couple of them,” Stern said. “What if I went up to the sheep and I said, ‘You wanna have a shot at the wolves? I’m gonna give you a pistol. You can actually even the playing field with these wolves whose fangs are out — you could shoot them and save your family.'"

Stern said he's anti-violence and admits that he couldn't "hurt a fly" if confronted and labels himself as a sheep. But, he said, "there are such horrible monsters in our world."

"The wolves are always plotting. They’ll use boxcutters. They’ll use an airplane to fly it right into a building. They don’t need AR-15s."

The outspoken SiriusXm personality said he's not for "taking away people’s rights," adding he thinks "the answer doesn't lie in taking any kind of ability of the sheep to protect themselves from the wolves. I wish it was that simple."

Film at 11.... 😟
tailgater
10 years ago
Wait.

Howard Stern is alive?

Users browsing this topic