wtf is that supposed to mean?

BlackCat13th wrote:

um, black cat, 13...you're like a genus.

frankj1 wrote:

to you - i'm more like a: kingdom, genus, and species.

BlackCat13th wrote:

He's gotcha there Frank.[sarcasm]

riverdog wrote:

It is interesting that in Tulsa the protesting has been peaceful. I wonder if this is because the authorities were immediately so transparent with the video, or if they have worked hard on neighborhood relationships, or what?

Speyside wrote:

what do you hate about idiots? did idiots used to slap you around like a little punkbitch? i know idiots that are far more intellegent than you, homer mah boy.

BlackCat13th wrote:

I heard the cops there blared the national anthem out of PA speakers and everyone just sat down.

Krazeehorse wrote:

Ever hear of that birds of a feather thing ?

tonygraz wrote:

I'm sure you know and hang around with mostly idiots.

tonygraz wrote:

you and I are very close on this fine line stuff, but we split at this type of point...

If a town was 95% white, and 98.2% of those proven guilty of recent B & E's (or even armed assaults and hold ups) were white residents, we both know that no one is being stopped and frisked on the street, no one is being pulled over randomly.

They'd have to match a pretty detailed description.

frankj1 wrote:

We could "what if" this until we die.

Abrignac wrote:

to both the candidates.

i'm not sure i can support you if i dont hear you say that "there cant be civility without civil rights or civil rights without civility."

all of what's going on is due to the erosion of our civil rights. first amendment is in tatters, second amendment is almost out the door, fourth amendment is long gone, some places you cant testify at all if you want a 5th amendment..... you need to run on restoring civil right or i guarantee you osama will win from the grave and america will crumble. the federal government has played right into osamas cold dead hands. there is no civility without civil rights, there is no justice while there is a paramilitary enjoying impunity to walk all over our people.




you cant take sides on this one. you'll lose if you dont see that people are upset like their civil rights are gone, flown away, federally lost. it's why there's no support for the federal government, all the way around. dont kid yourselves. it will mean civil war one way or another if you cant see that. this is america, we have rights here or we have war. that's the american way. that's why we're the home of the brave.





this is not a threat, it's the inevitable outcome that will happen independently of my or anyone's ability to perceive or influence it. it's the way america works or doesn't work. "give us freedom or give us death."

BlackCat13th wrote:

Dear dopey feline - its: "Give me liberty or give me death". If you were only half as bright as you hoped you were.

tonygraz wrote:

We could "what if" this until we die. But, doing so only creates an illusion of something that isn't so. For the most part I totally respect everything you say even though we have a different view on some things. That is why I enjoy bantering back an forth with you my friend. But, in this instance I must draw the line. It really seems you are throwing out something that doesn't exist, but assumes the weight of fact.

But, since you opened that door I'll walk through it. If you can show me a community where your example exists, then as a white male, I say profile the chit out of every white male walking down the road. At the end of the day, it's about protecting the masses at the expense of a few.

TANSTAAFL!!!

Abrignac wrote: