Lol. I use that all the time too. It's fun.

teedubbya wrote:

Good. Unlike you, I want this crap found, and prosecuted. I don't care which party the perp votes for.

We all get ONE vote. That means if you're rich, poor, lib, con, we're equal on election day... and anyone voting more than once deserves to be prosecuted. And if you think it isn't happening for Hillary... you're even more of an idiot than I initially thought.

Maybe if they catch a few more Trump voters trying to cheat the dems will want something done?? Nah. Then they'd get caught, too. They prefer to be better cheaters instead of requiring ID.

MACS wrote:

Weren't you against showing IDs..?? That would make you against voter fraud prevention. .. 😟

DrafterX wrote:

Hey Mr. Know It All, please post where I've ever said that I'm alfight with voter fraud?

banderl wrote:

This happened in Iowa, they don't have Voter ID laws there. How did they possibly catch her?

banderl wrote:

Showing ID would have made it easier. How many did they not catch?

MACS wrote:

If you are, in fact, in favor of voter ID... then carry on. If not, my comment is valid, and you can pour yourself a cup.

MACS wrote:

How do you know that it would have made it "easier"?
How did they catch her without an ID law?
How many did they not catch?
You're the guy claiming that it's a rampant problem, answer your own question.

banderl wrote: