DrafterX
9 years ago
I think Obama has that title. .. which Is why Trump got elected. ... 😟
zitotczito
9 years ago

If Trump weren't the most divisive president elect in the world we wouldn't have these problems....

Man this is gonna be a fun 8 years.

victor809 wrote:



And 8 years it will be.=d>
DrafterX
9 years ago
If he sucks will the Republicans run somebody against him in 4 years. .?? Has it ever been done.. ?? 😕
teedubbya
9 years ago
It's been done
DrafterX
9 years ago
Who and when..?? Would rather get my info here than Google it... 😟
Burner02
9 years ago

If Trump weren't the most divisive president elect in the world we wouldn't have these problems....

Man this is gonna be a fun 8 years.

victor809 wrote:




Not even close to the last eight years.

But then again, maybe so for the left.
tailgater
9 years ago

If Trump weren't the most divisive president elect in the world we wouldn't have these problems....

Man this is gonna be a fun 8 years.

victor809 wrote:



Liberals hate him and that makes him the devisive one.

Even better, liberals hate him based on the media manipulation of who he is.

Makes me giggle.


victor809
9 years ago
One could have said the same thing 8 years ago about Obama.

So now we have a new most divisive president elect ever!

Covfireman
9 years ago
I'm from a small town that has about a 49/49/2 % 49 % black 49% white and 2% other . I haven't saw the relationship between the races in my community closer to the breaking point in 50 years . You can't blame it on Trump . He wasn't the one in office the last 8 years . He isn't the president who is even now ignoring what is happening here .

But you are right Victor NOW we have the most divisive president ever !


Give Trump a chance . I will and I certainly wouldn't have ever voted for him . I did think about it as a vote against Hillary . She kept running the ad where they have Trump saying "you can tell them to go f@#/ themselves " and I think some of that needs to be in our foreign policy .
tailgater
9 years ago

One could have said the same thing 8 years ago about Obama.

So now we have a new most divisive president elect ever!

victor809 wrote:



The difference from 8 years ago is not subtle.

Conservatives did throw some hate onto the new president elect. This is true.
And some of it was based on lies (birth thingy) while a lot of it was based on truths (associations with known anti-American terrorist Bill Ayers, for instance).

And back then, the media was so favorable that many on the right called Obama "the anointed one".
All negative outcry was labeled as racist.
And there were no riots in the streets. No protests by public and government officials, schools, etc.
No flags lowered to half mast.

Just a few angry people shouting from their soap box, for right or wrong.
DrafterX
9 years ago
and Obama coulda squashed it back then by producing his college transcripts and birth certificate and stuff.. but his arrogant ass decided to divide instead... 😟
frankj1
9 years ago

Liberals hate him and that makes him the devisive one.

tailgater wrote:



that's silly, silly. His statements caused both.

tailgater
9 years ago

that's silly, silly. His statements caused both.

frankj1 wrote:



Frank, my friend.
We could fill an entire evening talking about the media manipulation on that point.


Honest question:
The Don has been front page for decades. A larger than life blow hard.
But has anyone ever heard of his "prejudices" prior to winning the GOP ticket?

He's been nothing, if not an equal opportunity azz wipe.

This whole "divisive" BS has been born and bred by the media in support of HRC.


I suggest we fill an entire evening soon. To discuss these point.
Or to simply smoke a cigar.
frankj1
9 years ago

Frank, my friend.
We could fill an entire evening talking about the media manipulation on that point.


Honest question:
The Don has been front page for decades. A larger than life blow hard.
But has anyone ever heard of his "prejudices" prior to winning the GOP ticket?

He's been nothing, if not an equal opportunity azz wipe.

This whole "divisive" BS has been born and bred by the media in support of HRC.


I suggest we fill an entire evening soon. To discuss these point.
Or to simply smoke a cigar.

tailgater wrote:


A larger than life blowhard is the GOP President elect of the US of A, and he answered questions with and also willingly volunteered objectionable opinions! That's not media manipulation, that was him showing his expertise manipulating the coverage he received knowing he would get the angry guys off the sofa to vote. Was he misquoted? He never said that. Has he backed off? Of course, cuz he's a blowhard.

Consider this, no one asked about any of his opinions on social ills and politics when he was front page for decades. Why would they care what he felt about immigration when he hit the headlines for suing the NFL?

But he decided to run for the most powerful position on Earth and you should not be surprised that his musings are recorded and reprinted in big city newspapers.

Geezus Joe, the man twats opinions all night long! You really shouldn't color him as an innocent victim.

Where do you want to go for dinner?
zitotczito
9 years ago

Geezus Joe, the man T_ _ _ _ (sounds like T with Watts) opinions all night long! You really shouldn't color him as an innocent victim.



Nice use of language there frankj1

Freudian slip?

And who on this forum left the time-out rooms open.
frankj1
9 years ago

Nice use of language there frankj1

Freudian slip?

And who on this forum left the time-out rooms open.

zitotczito wrote:


I did that on purpose, never thought it would get through.
The only related thing Freudian might be that ***** comment Trump made.

Pretty funny though, right?

Come on, funny!
zitotczito
9 years ago

I did that on purpose, never thought it would get through.
The only related thing Freudian might be that ***** comment Trump made.

Pretty funny though, right?

Come on, funny!

frankj1 wrote:




So you used a clearly beyond foul description of a female body part on purpose and yet you attack Trump.

What makes you any better then him?

Now If you are willing to give Trump the benefit of the doubt; I will also give you the benefit of the doubt.


frankj1
9 years ago

So you used a clearly beyond foul description of a female body part on purpose and yet you attack Trump.

What makes you any better then him?

Now If you are willing to give Trump the benefit of the doubt; I will also give you the benefit of the doubt.


zitotczito wrote:


aren't you embarrassed to ask a libtard a question like that? Not sure I attacked the man either, and anyone who knows me knows I am definitely no better than him!

OK, I'll break it down for you.

My use was satire, a play on words at his expense. It was actually very clever...He used his word years ago in that hot mike tape (and a clumsy phrase about "bleeding" during the debates) and he tweets incessantly. I summed it all up in one word. Satire? Perhaps. Humor? For sure.

But I had no way of knowing you'd be offended by my little play on words (tweet/****) on a discount cigar forum while OK with his graphic word usage while on the national stage running for the highest position in the land. My bad.

Lighten up and laugh.
opelmanta1900
9 years ago
who's hot mike?
zitotczito
9 years ago

aren't you embarrassed to ask a libtard a question like that? Not sure I attacked the man either, and anyone who knows me knows I am definitely no better than him!

OK, I'll break it down for you.

My use was satire, a play on words at his expense. It was actually very clever...He used his word years ago in that hot mike tape (and a clumsy phrase about "bleeding" during the debates) and he tweets incessantly. I summed it all up in one word. Satire? Perhaps. Humor? For sure.

But I had no way of knowing you'd be offended by my little play on words (tweet/****) on a discount cigar forum while OK with his graphic word usage while on the national stage running for the highest position in the land. My bad.

Lighten up and laugh.

frankj1 wrote:



Embarrassed-Nah

Not sure you attacked him, lets see-"A larger than life blowhard" and you used satire, a play on words at his expense sure appears to be an attack.

Now I did get the satire part of your statement and I also realize that from what I have read of your posts, you seem to consider issues on their own merits a lot of times. My point is that his use of inappropriate language was wrong and your use of that language even for satire was beneath you, your better than that.

😄
Users browsing this topic