Neither is/was he.

And who cares about uranium when there's the pizza sex scandal to talk about?!

tailgater wrote:

Do you honestly think it's as big a deal as this whole situation has become?

People don't even know WHY "Russia" is a bad thing.
They hate trump. And that's all that matters.

Just look at the Trump/Putin history in the news.
First he's buddies with him. Which was deemed as a bad thing.
Then they were enemies. Again, this is very bad.
Now we're back to them being bedfellows and it's bad. Again.

Time to sh*t or get off the pot.
Instead, the media choose to just stir.

tailgater wrote:

Damm Russkies are slick, devious and malicious...hacking the DNC emails was just a tip of the iceberg of the tool-kit they used to mess with our election. One of their first accomplishments, an indication that they had an insider in the Trump campaign early on, before the GOP convention, was the late switch in language about US assistance to Ukraine in the GOP platform. That came out of thin air, and was a head scratcher when the Trump campaign insisted on the change that benefited the Russian involvement in Ukraine, just a few days before the convention. That was one of the first public signs that there may be a there there.

delta1 wrote:

I think it is worth a look. then I can answer your question of worth it or not. After that, we will know if the many connections are problematic.

I chuckle every time you write "had contact" or "spoke to". Why lighten the language, unless it is too damning?

Is it possible you do not know the deep levels of involvement of the original campaign manager, and Flynn, and on and on? Not contacts, Joe, but lots and lots of money...and kept quiet from US.

Let's find out, we deserve to know that we all get a clean bill of health...but I tell ya again, it won't end up as an election issue, just as whitewater didn't end up as a failed real estate deal, but a sex act.

Hope we aren't Monica.

frankj1 wrote:

she's not now nor was then President. The level of concern existed in proportion.

and the way the story is told here, I'm certain many actually believe she sold physical uranium owned by the US to Russia. Very few actually understand the transaction, the players, and the process of the approval sign-off.

frankj1 wrote:

But "had contact" and "spoke to" is the only accurate terms, at least until we know otherwise.
You're the one that is speculating and treating it as fact.

So take your own advice. Let's find out. But you've already made up your mind.

tailgater wrote:

Come on my friend. Had the Dems not authored the emails, they would not have been leaked. Blaming the Russians is nothing but deflection.

Abrignac wrote:

You're right about who authored the emails...but leaking emails wasn't the only thing, nor the most serious that the Russians did. You may not have read the rest of my post, or are in denial about the other stuff that has happened that arouses suspicions about Russian activities during the presidential elections. Other stuff has been reported and documented and listed here in other threads, but most Trump supporters dismiss them as inconsequential, possibly without even looking into them.

The unexpected and unexplained change in the GOP platform to favor Russia in Ukraine at the insistence of the Trump campaign is like a canary in the mine...an indication that the Russians had engaged an ally (or more) among members of Trump's inner circle. Brennan's testimony indicates more than one were being targeted by Russian agents...

It stretches the imagination that Trump was unaware, but Christie's free ride after Bridgegate after his top aides were convicted proves anything is possible...

I am certain that had the Russians did anything to help Clinton win the election and undermine Trump, you would be demanding an investigation and urging the House to start impeachment proceedings...

delta1 wrote:

The generals in Syria have said Russian isn't helping us to fight ISIS...no Russian boots on the ground or planes in the air fighting ISIS in Iraq...

...did you see Trump shove the PM of Montenegro aside so he could get to the front of the NATO pack for the photo op? Putin hates that guy (word is he's on the "list") so he prolly liked what his dog Trump did...

...and Trump clowned all the NATO deadbeats without saying he's got their backs...so he occasionally can reach back to his campaign rhetoric...

...but...aren't all of them our friends and allies...who stepped up and had our backs after 9/11...???...

delta1 wrote: