N*gger used to be one of those words paul... do you miss those times?

opelmanta1900 wrote:

N*gger used to be one of those words paul... do you miss those times?

opelmanta1900 wrote:

that word is still used everyday by Blacks ( to include our former president!!!! ) .. it must not be that bad... 😟

DrafterX wrote:

that word is still used everyday.. it must not be that bad... 😟

DrafterX wrote:

Did tcby just say he misses the days when he could say n*gger?

victor809 wrote:

people are still murdered every day as well... what the hell kind of logic...

opelmanta1900 wrote:

Joel, none of the words I used have a connotation such as the n word, and you know that. Drafter, you are right, there or other types of terrorists.

Speyside wrote:

#highelevationliving

opelmanta1900 wrote:

Did tcby just say he misses the days when he could say n*gger?

victor809 wrote:

none of that was directed anywhere near you... unless your argument also happens to be that "we already have words in place and those are good words, don't try and change my words", in which case, yes, they are as bad as the n-word because you're hanging onto them in spite of and possibly because they inflame others...

opelmanta1900 wrote:

#PCCalidreaddude

TMCTLT wrote:

to be fair I don't think he said he misses those days... I think he flat out said he still uses it cuz he saw a couple of guys on the BET use it...

opelmanta1900 wrote:

You and the rest of the PCers can remove all the " bad words " that make you lose sleep @ night from books etc. but they'll never go away completely no matter how hard you and others try. That's Just the TRUTH, you cannot and should not police words...but you progressives think it's possible.

TMCTLT wrote:

4 years ago called... they said you could keep the joke cuz it wasn't that good to begin with...

opelmanta1900 wrote:

No, my POV is what words are accurate. Simple math could be used as an example. 5=5 is true. 5=0 is not true. If it enraged someone that 5=5 it does not change the fact that 5=0 is not true.

Speyside wrote:

this entire conversation is being had because spey specifically wants words policed in a specific direction... well, that, and your love for the word n*gger...

opelmanta1900 wrote:

by definition, marriage was never between a man and woman... by tradition, yes... by definition, no... that's why one of the first moves many conservative states took was to "define" marriage as between a man and a woman...

so it's not a 5+5 thing, it's an opinion thing...

opelmanta1900 wrote:

Ask God about that... 😟

DrafterX wrote: