Why did you number your responses when they all say the same thing?
I said Obama was a liberal democrat because his detractors were right wing.
tailgater wrote:
But when we are looking at detractors and arguments detractors use, we have no reason to limit ourselves to one side. Unless you think one side over the other chooses arguments with no basis on political capabilities.
You're all caught up in the fact that the slander was regarding his birth. It could have been a more common complaint such as a bastid child or 12 mistresses and you'd claim it was racial because everyone thinks black men do that.
No matter what it was going to be about his color.
I can see why you would like to believe that. But it's a stupid argument. You're pretending that there were no other stupid claims when you say that. But you know that's not true. I'm not making a claim that the dumb crap about him wearing a tan suit was racist. I'm not saying the claim that he was unqualified because he was a community organizer was racist. I've not stated that the claim that his mother was a porn star was racist....
There are a couple very specific issues which smack of racism. No one has said all of them. You're weakening your argument by trying to pretend I would make an argument which I have not made.
I'm pretty sure the "tail is definitely sure it isn't racist" is a pretty weak argument.
And your power-punch conclusion? That actual racists didn't like him either.
Bravo! That totally proves your point...
So tell us.
How many?
And is it enough? Or do you still feel the white guilt?
Without proving your point, you try to fall back on some BS "race baiting" claim
Since you never proved your point, that broadens your claim to now encompass anything which actually may be racist. It kind of makes you seen pretty racist if you follow that train of logic... I mean, if I find the KKK to be racist, are you gonna cry "white guilt!" and ask me how many black friends I have?
You're showing a lot of yourself here tail. and I really do find it distasteful
