TL Caren is always invited.

I don't care WHO the 'tards identify with, they don't represent me as a conservative.

MACS wrote:

Did you consider they voted for Trump because Hillary sucked.. it's not like they had another option... 😟

DrafterX wrote:

well said. but they certainly are not liberals.
now if only cons would stop referring to libs as all buying in to objectionable stuff, we could be great again.

two way street.

frankj1 wrote:

first choice was Bannon, but he didn't run

HA!

frankj1 wrote:

Maybe I was raised differently, but I always believed there were certain people it was considered "appropriate" and "pro-american" to punch.... Nazis... child molesters... the homeless (ok, the last one is a joke because I know one of you azzholes would say it anyway). Sure, if you punch a nazi or a child molester it's still legally wrong and you should accept legal ramifications, but morally you're justified. because they're nazis. I mean, they were our last great unequivocal evil....

Well, apparently the nazis are upset about this...

William Fears told the Sun that he believed James Fields, who drove his car into a crowd of protesters in Charlottesville, Virginia, wasn’t unjustified. He also said alt-right movement supporters were “pushing back” against leftist supporters.

“It’s always been socially acceptable to punch a Nazi, to attack people if they have right-wing political leanings,” Fears said. “Us coming in and saying we’re taking over your town, we’re starting to push back, we’re starting to want to intimidate back. We want to show our teeth a little bit because, you know, we’re not to be taken lightly. We don’t want violence; we don’t want harm. But at the end of the day, we’re not opposed to defending ourselves.”

When did these bits of slime start thinking they were allowed to crawl out from under their rocks?

http://www.gainesville.com/news/20171020/three-charged-in-shooting-after-spencer-talk 

victor809 wrote:

JJ, BS, you throw that out there, provide some proof or shut up! Your comment is offensive and you never back it up. Nazis are filth who would like to be part of the extreme right. They support Trump, they are white nationalists and so on. They are not accepted by any political or philosophical groups. I am tired of your idiotic comments. Back them up with facts.

Speyside wrote:

And I've never said otherwise macs. I've said that was between the players and the owners and the president should stay the fxxx out (because guess what? He's the government.. once he gets involved it starts to reek of government pressure)

victor809 wrote:

Right... freedom of speech (kneeling during the anthem) is not free from getting you fired, or free from millions of people to quit supporting your employers.

Consequences.

MACS wrote:

MACS... Gonna disagree with you there. A president stating their personal opinion is not "personal" any longer. A president does not have the same freedoms that an average citizen has. All other presidents recognized that, and you recognized it a couple years ago when you were angry at Obama for expressing his opinion about a cop who stopped a professor coming home.

When a president says something negative about a company (media?) An organization, another country, at trade agreement or even a person that carries with it the threat that there will be some government involvement. You liked it when Trump said this bullcrap about NATO or nafta... that same thing you like about him wielding his "power" in those cases is the same crap he shouldn't be doing when it has to do with citizens statements.

victor809 wrote:

If it truly was a two way street, liberals would be denouncing antifa and blm, just like they want conservatives to denounce nazis (which most of us do, btw). No... they hold them up as social justice warriors.

They're not.

MACS wrote: